email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats in the past requiring royalty payments, I suspect
+multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>