]> pere.pagekite.me Git - text-relativity-of-wrong-asimov.git/blob - The_Relativity_of_Wrong.nb.po
Adjust comments.
[text-relativity-of-wrong-asimov.git] / The_Relativity_of_Wrong.nb.po
1 # Copyright (C) 2016 Petter Reinholdtsen
2 # This file is distributed under the same license as the Relativitiy of Wrong package.
3 #
4 # Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>, 2016.
5 msgid ""
6 msgstr ""
7 "Project-Id-Version: \n"
8 "POT-Creation-Date: 2016-07-28 10:13+0200\n"
9 "PO-Revision-Date: 2016-07-28 09:28+0200\n"
10 "Last-Translator: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>\n"
11 "Language-Team: Norwegian Bokmål <i18n-no@lister.ping.uio.no>\n"
12 "Language: nb\n"
13 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
14 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
15 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
16 "Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n"
17 "X-Generator: Lokalize 1.5\n"
18
19 #. type: Plain text
20 msgid "From The Skeptical Inquirer, Fall 1989, Vol. 14, No. 1, Pp. 35-44"
21 msgstr "Fra The Skeptical Inquirer, høsten 1989, vol. 14, no. 1, s. 35-44"
22
23 #. type: Plain text
24 msgid "The Relativity of Wrong"
25 msgstr "Relativiteten til feil"
26
27 #. type: Plain text
28 msgid "By Isaac Asimov"
29 msgstr "Av Isaac Asimov. Oversatt til bokmål av Petter Reinholdtsen."
30
31 #. type: Plain text
32 msgid ""
33 "I RECEIVED a letter the other day. It was handwritten in crabbed penmanship "
34 "so that it was very difficult to read. Nevertheless, I tried to make it out "
35 "just in case it might prove to be important. In the first sentence, the "
36 "writer told me he was majoring in English literature, but felt he needed to "
37 "teach me science. (I sighed a bit, for I knew very few English Lit majors "
38 "who are equipped to teach me science, but I am very aware of the vast state "
39 "of my ignorance and I am prepared to learn as much as I can from anyone, so "
40 "I read on.)"
41 msgstr ""
42 "Jeg fikk et brev her om dagen. Det var håndskrevet med knotete håndskrift "
43 "som gjorde det vanskelig å lese. Jeg forsøkte uansett å forstå hva som sto "
44 "der i tilfelle det skulle vise seg å være noe viktig. I den første "
45 "setningen forklarte forfatteren at han hadde hovedfag i engelsk litteratur "
46 "men følte at han trengte å lære meg naturvitenskap. (Jeg sukket litt, da "
47 "jeg vet veldig få med engelsk hovedfag som er utstyrt til å lære meg "
48 "naturvitenskap. Men jeg er godt kjent med det enorme omfanget av alt jeg "
49 "ikke vet og klar til å lære så mye jeg kan fra hvem det skal være, så jeg "
50 "fortsatte å lese.)"
51
52 #. type: Plain text
53 msgid ""
54 "It seemed that in one of my innumerable essays, I had expressed a certain "
55 "gladness at living in a century in which we finally got the basis of the "
56 "universe straight."
57 msgstr ""
58 "Det virket som om at jeg i et av mine utallige tekster hadde gitt uttrykk "
59 "for en viss glede over å leve i et århundre hvor vi endelig hadde fått "
60 "grunnlaget for universet riktig."
61
62 #. type: Plain text
63 msgid ""
64 "I didn't go into detail in the matter, but what I meant was that we now know "
65 "the basic rules governing the universe, together with the gravitational "
66 "interrelationships of its gross components, as shown in the theory of "
67 "relativity worked out between 1905 and 1916. We also know the basic rules "
68 "governing the subatomic particles and their interrelationships, since these "
69 "are very neatly described by the quantum theory worked out between 1900 and "
70 "1930. What's more, we have found that the galaxies and clusters of galaxies "
71 "are the basic units of the physical universe, as discovered between 1920 and "
72 "1930."
73 msgstr ""
74 "Jeg gikk ikke i detaljer, men det jeg mente var at vi nå vet de "
75 "grunnleggende reglene som styrer universet og hvordan gravitasjonen for "
76 "mesteparten virker sammen, slik relativitetsteorien utarbeidet mellom 1905 "
77 "og 1916 viser. Vi kjenner også til de grunnleggende reglene som styrer "
78 "subatomære partikler og deres forhold til hverandre, da disse er svært godt "
79 "beskrevet av kvanteteorien som ble utarbeidet mellom 1900 og 1930. I "
80 "tillegg har vi funnet ut at galakser og samlinger av galakser er de "
81 "grunnleggende enhetene som utgjør det fysiske universet, slik det ble "
82 "oppdaget mellom 1920 og 1930."
83
84 #. type: Plain text
85 msgid "These are all twentieth-century discoveries, you see."
86 msgstr "Alle disse, ser du, er oppdagelser fra det tyvende århundre."
87
88 #. type: Plain text
89 msgid ""
90 "The young specialist in English Lit, having quoted me, went on to lecture me "
91 "severely on the fact that in every century people have thought they "
92 "understood the universe at last, and in every century they were proved to be "
93 "wrong. It follows that the one thing we can say about our modern \"knowledge"
94 "\" is that it is wrong. The young man then quoted with approval what "
95 "Socrates had said on learning that the Delphic oracle had proclaimed him the "
96 "wisest man in Greece. \"If I am the wisest man,\" said Socrates, \"it is "
97 "because I alone know that I know nothing.\" the implication was that I was "
98 "very foolish because I was under the impression I knew a great deal."
99 msgstr ""
100 "Etter at den unge engelsk litteraturviteren hadde sitert meg, fortsatte han "
101 "med å belære meg om faktumet at i hvert århundre hadde folk trodd de endelig "
102 "hadde forstått universet, og i hvert eneste århundre hadde det vist seg at "
103 "de tok feil. Konklusjonen er at det eneste vi kan si om vår modere "
104 "«kunnskap» er at den beviselig er feil. Den unge mannen ga deretter sin "
105 "støtte til et sitat fra Sokrates, som hadde kommet med en kommentar da han "
106 "ble kjent med at oraklet i Delfi hadde erklært at han var den viseste mannen "
107 "i Hellas. «Hvis jeg er den viseste mannen», sa Skokrates, «så er det kun på "
108 "grunn av at jeg vet at jeg intet vet.» Implikasjonen var at jeg var svært "
109 "tåpelig som innbilte meg at jeg viste en hel masse."
110
111 #. type: Plain text
112 msgid ""
113 "My answer to him was, \"John, when people thought the earth was flat, they "
114 "were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they were wrong. "
115 "But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is just as wrong as "
116 "thinking the earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put "
117 "together.\""
118 msgstr ""
119 "Jeg svarte ham slik: «Da folk tenkte at jorden var flat, John, så tok de "
120 "feil. Når folk tenkte at orden var sfærisk, så tok de feil. Men hvis du "
121 "tror at det å tenke at jorden er sfærisk er like galt som å tenke at jorda "
122 "er flat, så er ditt syn mer feil enn begge to slått sammen.»"
123
124 #. type: Plain text
125 msgid ""
126 "The basic trouble, you see, is that people think that \"right\" and \"wrong"
127 "\" are absolute; that everything that isn't perfectly and completely right "
128 "is totally and equally wrong."
129 msgstr ""
130 "Du forstår, det grunnleggende problemet er at folk tenker at «riktig» og "
131 "«galt» er absolutter. Alt alt som ikke er perfekt og fullstendig riktig er "
132 "fullstendig og likeverdig galt."
133
134 #. type: Plain text
135 msgid ""
136 "However, I don't think that's so. It seems to me that right and wrong are "
137 "fuzzy concepts, and I will devote this essay to an explanation of why I "
138 "think so."
139 msgstr ""
140 "Jeg tror derimot ikke at det er slik. For meg virker det som om riktig og "
141 "feil er uklare konsepter, og jeg vil bruke denne teksten til å forklare "
142 "hvorfor jeg mener dette."
143
144 #. type: Plain text
145 msgid ""
146 "When my friend the English literature expert tells me that in every century "
147 "scientists think they have worked out the universe and are always wrong, "
148 "what I want to know is how wrong are they? Are they always wrong to the same "
149 "degree? Let's take an example."
150 msgstr ""
151 "Når min venn og engelsk litteraturviter forteller meg at i hvert århundre "
152 "har naturvitenskapsfolk tenkt at de har forstått universet og alltid tatt "
153 "feil, så ønsker jeg å vite hvor feil tok de? Har de alltid tatt like mye "
154 "feil? La oss se på et eksempel."
155
156 #. type: Plain text
157 msgid ""
158 "In the early days of civilization, the general feeling was that the earth "
159 "was flat. This was not because people were stupid, or because they were "
160 "intent on believing silly things. They felt it was flat on the basis of "
161 "sound evidence. It was not just a matter of \"That's how it looks,\" because "
162 "the earth does not look flat. It looks chaotically bumpy, with hills, "
163 "valleys, ravines, cliffs, and so on."
164 msgstr ""
165 "I sivilisasjonens tidlige dager, var den generelle forståelsen at jorda var "
166 "flat. Det kom ikke av at folk var dumme, eller av at de var bestemt på å "
167 "tro på rare ting. De opplevde at den var flat basert på klare indisier. "
168 "Det var ikke et enkelt spørsmål om «det er slik den ser ut», da jorden jo "
169 "ikke ser flat ut. Den er jo kaotisk humpete, med hauger, daler, "
170 "steinrøyser, klipper og så videre."
171
172 #. type: Plain text
173 msgid ""
174 "Of course there are plains where, over limited areas, the earth's surface "
175 "does look fairly flat. One of those plains is in the Tigris-Euphrates area, "
176 "where the first historical civilization (one with writing) developed, that "
177 "of the Sumerians."
178 msgstr ""
179 "Selvsagt er det sletter der, i begrensede områder, jordens overflate ser "
180 "ganske flat ut. En av disse slettene er i Tigris-Eufrat-området, hvor den "
181 "første historiske sivilisasjonen (en med skriftspråk) ble utviklet seg. "
182 "Dvs. Summererne."
183
184 #. type: Plain text
185 msgid ""
186 "Perhaps it was the appearance of the plain that persuaded the clever "
187 "Sumerians to accept the generalization that the earth was flat; that if you "
188 "somehow evened out all the elevations and depressions, you would be left "
189 "with flatness. Contributing to the notion may have been the fact that "
190 "stretches of water (ponds and lakes) looked pretty flat on quiet days."
191 msgstr ""
192
193 #. type: Plain text
194 msgid ""
195 "Another way of looking at it is to ask what is the \"curvature\" of the "
196 "earth's surface. Over a considerable length, how much does the surface "
197 "deviate (on the average) from perfect flatness. The flat-earth theory would "
198 "make it seem that the surface doesn't deviate from flatness at all, that its "
199 "curvature is 0 to the mile."
200 msgstr ""
201 "En annen måte å se på det er å spørre seg hva «krumningen» for jordens "
202 "overflate er. Over en betydelig avstand, hvor mye avviker overflaten (i "
203 "gjennomsnitt) fra perfekt flathet. Jorden er flat-teorien ville få det til "
204 "å se ut som om overflaten ikke avviker fra flathet i det hele tatt, dvs. at "
205 "dens «krumning» er 0 per mil."
206
207 #. type: Plain text
208 msgid ""
209 "Nowadays, of course, we are taught that the flat-earth theory is wrong; that "
210 "it is all wrong, terribly wrong, absolutely. But it isn't. The curvature of "
211 "the earth is nearly 0 per mile, so that although the flat-earth theory is "
212 "wrong, it happens to be nearly right. That's why the theory lasted so long."
213 msgstr ""
214
215 #. type: Plain text
216 msgid ""
217 "There were reasons, to be sure, to find the flat-earth theory unsatisfactory "
218 "and, about 350 B.C., the Greek philosopher Aristotle summarized them. First, "
219 "certain stars disappeared beyond the Southern Hemisphere as one traveled "
220 "north, and beyond the Northern Hemisphere as one traveled south. Second, the "
221 "earth's shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse was always the arc of a "
222 "circle. Third, here on the earth itself, ships disappeared beyond the "
223 "horizon hull-first in whatever direction they were traveling."
224 msgstr ""
225
226 #. type: Plain text
227 msgid ""
228 "All three observations could not be reasonably explained if the earth's "
229 "surface were flat, but could be explained by assuming the earth to be a "
230 "sphere."
231 msgstr ""
232
233 #. type: Plain text
234 msgid ""
235 "What's more, Aristotle believed that all solid matter tended to move toward "
236 "a common center, and if solid matter did this, it would end up as a sphere. "
237 "A given volume of matter is, on the average, closer to a common center if it "
238 "is a sphere than if it is any other shape whatever."
239 msgstr ""
240
241 #. type: Plain text
242 msgid ""
243 "About a century after Aristotle, the Greek philosopher Eratosthenes noted "
244 "that the sun cast a shadow of different lengths at different latitudes (all "
245 "the shadows would be the same length if the earth's surface were flat). From "
246 "the difference in shadow length, he calculated the size of the earthly "
247 "sphere and it turned out to be 25,000 miles in circumference."
248 msgstr ""
249
250 #. type: Plain text
251 msgid ""
252 "The curvature of such a sphere is about 0.000126 per mile, a quantity very "
253 "close to 0 per mile, as you can see, and one not easily measured by the "
254 "techniques at the disposal of the ancients. The tiny difference between 0 "
255 "and 0.000126 accounts for the fact that it took so long to pass from the "
256 "flat earth to the spherical earth."
257 msgstr ""
258
259 #. type: Plain text
260 msgid ""
261 "Mind you, even a tiny difference, such as that between 0 and 0.000126, can "
262 "be extremely important. That difference mounts up. The earth cannot be "
263 "mapped over large areas with any accuracy at all if the difference isn't "
264 "taken into account and if the earth isn't considered a sphere rather than a "
265 "flat surface. Long ocean voyages can't be undertaken with any reasonable way "
266 "of locating one's own position in the ocean unless the earth is considered "
267 "spherical rather than flat."
268 msgstr ""
269
270 #. type: Plain text
271 msgid ""
272 "Furthermore, the flat earth presupposes the possibility of an infinite "
273 "earth, or of the existence of an \"end\" to the surface. The spherical "
274 "earth, however, postulates an earth that is both endless and yet finite, and "
275 "it is the latter postulate that is consistent with all later findings."
276 msgstr ""
277
278 #. type: Plain text
279 msgid ""
280 "So, although the flat-earth theory is only slightly wrong and is a credit to "
281 "its inventors, all things considered, it is wrong enough to be discarded in "
282 "favor of the spherical-earth theory."
283 msgstr ""
284
285 #. type: Plain text
286 msgid "And yet is the earth a sphere?"
287 msgstr "Men er virkelig jorden en sfære?"
288
289 #. type: Plain text
290 msgid ""
291 "No, it is not a sphere; not in the strict mathematical sense. A sphere has "
292 "certain mathematical properties - for instance, all diameters (that is, all "
293 "straight lines that pass from one point on its surface, through the center, "
294 "to another point on its surface) have the same length."
295 msgstr ""
296 "Nei, den er ikke en sfære, ikke i matematisk forstand. En sfære har visse "
297 "matematiske egenskaper - for eksempel har alle diametre (dvs. alle rette "
298 "linjer som går fra et punkt på overflaten, gjennom sentrum, til et annet "
299 "punkt på overflaten) samme lengde."
300
301 #. type: Plain text
302 msgid ""
303 "That, however, is not true of the earth. Various diameters of the earth "
304 "differ in length."
305 msgstr ""
306 "Dette er derimot ikke riktig for jorden. Forskjellige diametre gjennom "
307 "jorden har ulik lengde."
308
309 #. type: Plain text
310 msgid ""
311 "What gave people the notion the earth wasn't a true sphere? To begin with, "
312 "the sun and the moon have outlines that are perfect circles within the "
313 "limits of measurement in the early days of the telescope. This is "
314 "consistent with the supposition that the sun and the moon are perfectly "
315 "spherical in shape."
316 msgstr ""
317
318 #. type: Plain text
319 msgid ""
320 "However, when Jupiter and Saturn were observed by the first telescopic "
321 "observers, it became quickly apparent that the outlines of those planets "
322 "were not circles, but distinct ellipses. That meant that Jupiter and Saturn "
323 "were not true spheres."
324 msgstr ""
325
326 #. type: Plain text
327 msgid ""
328 "Isaac Newton, toward the end of the seventeenth century, showed that a "
329 "massive body would form a sphere under the pull of gravitational forces "
330 "(exactly as Aristotle had argued), but only if it were not rotating. If it "
331 "were rotating, a centrifugal effect would be set up that would lift the "
332 "body's substance against gravity, and this effect would be greater the "
333 "closer to the equator you progressed. The effect would also be greater the "
334 "more rapidly a spherical object rotated, and Jupiter and Saturn rotated very "
335 "rapidly indeed."
336 msgstr ""
337
338 #. type: Plain text
339 msgid ""
340 "The earth rotated much more slowly than Jupiter or Saturn so the effect "
341 "should be smaller, but it should still be there. Actual measurements of the "
342 "curvature of the earth were carried out in the eighteenth century and Newton "
343 "was proved correct."
344 msgstr ""
345
346 #. type: Plain text
347 msgid ""
348 "The earth has an equatorial bulge, in other words. It is flattened at the "
349 "poles. It is an \"oblate spheroid\" rather than a sphere. This means that "
350 "the various diameters of the earth differ in length. The longest diameters "
351 "are any of those that stretch from one point on the equator to an opposite "
352 "point on the equator. This \"equatorial diameter\" is 12,755 kilometers "
353 "(7,927 miles). The shortest diameter is from the North Pole to the South "
354 "Pole and this \"polar diameter\" is 12,711 kilometers (7,900 miles)."
355 msgstr ""
356
357 #. type: Plain text
358 msgid ""
359 "The difference between the longest and shortest diameters is 44 kilometers "
360 "(27 miles), and that means that the \"oblateness\" of the earth (its "
361 "departure from true sphericity) is 44/12755, or 0.0034. This amounts to l/3 "
362 "of 1 percent."
363 msgstr ""
364
365 #. type: Plain text
366 msgid ""
367 "To put it another way, on a flat surface, curvature is 0 per mile "
368 "everywhere. On the earth's spherical surface, curvature is 0.000126 per mile "
369 "everywhere (or 8 inches per mile). On the earth's oblate spheroidal surface, "
370 "the curvature varies from 7.973 inches to the mile to 8.027 inches to the "
371 "mile."
372 msgstr ""
373
374 #. type: Plain text
375 msgid ""
376 "The correction in going from spherical to oblate spheroidal is much smaller "
377 "than going from flat to spherical. Therefore, although the notion of the "
378 "earth as a sphere is wrong, strictly speaking, it is not as wrong as the "
379 "notion of the earth as flat."
380 msgstr ""
381
382 #. type: Plain text
383 msgid ""
384 "Even the oblate-spheroidal notion of the earth is wrong, strictly speaking. "
385 "In 1958, when the satellite Vanguard I was put into orbit about the earth, "
386 "it was able to measure the local gravitational pull of the earth--and "
387 "therefore its shape--with unprecedented precision. It turned out that the "
388 "equatorial bulge south of the equator was slightly bulgier than the bulge "
389 "north of the equator, and that the South Pole sea level was slightly nearer "
390 "the center of the earth than the North Pole sea level was."
391 msgstr ""
392
393 #. type: Plain text
394 msgid ""
395 "There seemed no other way of describing this than by saying the earth was "
396 "pear-shaped, and at once many people decided that the earth was nothing like "
397 "a sphere but was shaped like a Bartlett pear dangling in space. Actually, "
398 "the pear-like deviation from oblate-spheroid perfect was a matter of yards "
399 "rather than miles, and the adjustment of curvature was in the millionths of "
400 "an inch per mile."
401 msgstr ""
402
403 #. type: Plain text
404 msgid ""
405 "In short, my English Lit friend, living in a mental world of absolute rights "
406 "and wrongs, may be imagining that because all theories are wrong, the earth "
407 "may be thought spherical now, but cubical next century, and a hollow "
408 "icosahedron the next, and a doughnut shape the one after."
409 msgstr ""
410
411 #. type: Plain text
412 msgid ""
413 "What actually happens is that once scientists get hold of a good concept "
414 "they gradually refine and extend it with greater and greater subtlety as "
415 "their instruments of measurement improve. Theories are not so much wrong as "
416 "incomplete."
417 msgstr ""
418
419 #. type: Plain text
420 msgid ""
421 "This can be pointed out in many cases other than just the shape of the "
422 "earth. Even when a new theory seems to represent a revolution, it usually "
423 "arises out of small refinements. If something more than a small refinement "
424 "were needed, then the old theory would never have endured."
425 msgstr ""
426
427 #. type: Plain text
428 msgid ""
429 "Copernicus switched from an earth-centered planetary system to a sun-"
430 "centered one. In doing so, he switched from something that was obvious to "
431 "something that was apparently ridiculous. However, it was a matter of "
432 "finding better ways of calculating the motion of the planets in the sky, and "
433 "eventually the geocentric theory was just left behind. It was precisely "
434 "because the old theory gave results that were fairly good by the measurement "
435 "standards of the time that kept it in being so long."
436 msgstr ""
437
438 #. type: Plain text
439 msgid ""
440 "Again, it is because the geological formations of the earth change so slowly "
441 "and the living things upon it evolve so slowly that it seemed reasonable at "
442 "first to suppose that there was no change and that the earth and life always "
443 "existed as they do today. If that were so, it would make no difference "
444 "whether the earth and life were billions of years old or thousands. "
445 "Thousands were easier to grasp."
446 msgstr ""
447
448 #. type: Plain text
449 msgid ""
450 "But when careful observation showed that the earth and life were changing at "
451 "a rate that was very tiny but not zero, then it became clear that the earth "
452 "and life had to be very old. Modern geology came into being, and so did the "
453 "notion of biological evolution."
454 msgstr ""
455
456 #. type: Plain text
457 msgid ""
458 "If the rate of change were more rapid, geology and evolution would have "
459 "reached their modern state in ancient times. It is only because the "
460 "difference between the rate of change in a static universe and the rate of "
461 "change in an evolutionary one is that between zero and very nearly zero that "
462 "the creationists can continue propagating their folly."
463 msgstr ""
464
465 #. type: Plain text
466 msgid ""
467 "Since the refinements in theory grow smaller and smaller, even quite ancient "
468 "theories must have been sufficiently right to allow advances to be made; "
469 "advances that were not wiped out by subsequent refinements."
470 msgstr ""
471
472 #. type: Plain text
473 msgid ""
474 "The Greeks introduced the notion of latitude and longitude, for instance, "
475 "and made reasonable maps of the Mediterranean basin even without taking "
476 "sphericity into account, and we still use latitude and longitude today."
477 msgstr ""
478 "Grekerne introduserte for eksempel begrepene lengdegrad og breddegrad, og "
479 "laget fornuftige kart over middelhavet, uten å ta hensyn til sfæriskiskhet, "
480 "og vi bruker fortsatt lengdegrad og breddegrad i dag."
481
482 #. type: Plain text
483 msgid ""
484 "The Sumerians were probably the first to establish the principle that "
485 "planetary movements in the sky exhibit regularity and can be predicted, and "
486 "they proceeded to work out ways of doing so even though they assumed the "
487 "earth to be the center of the universe. Their measurements have been "
488 "enormously refined but the principle remains."
489 msgstr ""
490
491 #. type: Plain text
492 msgid ""
493 "Naturally, the theories we now have might be considered wrong in the "
494 "simplistic sense of my English Lit correspondent, but in a much truer and "
495 "subtler sense, they need only be considered incomplete."
496 msgstr ""
497 "Selvfølgelig kan teoriene vi har nå anses å være feil i den enkle "
498 "betydningen av ordet som min engelske litteraturviterkorrepondent legger opp "
499 "til, men i en mer sannferdig og subtil forståelse bør de bare anses som "
500 "ufullstendige."