# Copyright (C) 2016 Petter Reinholdtsen # This file is distributed under the same license as the Relativitiy of Wrong package. # # Petter Reinholdtsen , 2016. msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: \n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2016-07-28 10:13+0200\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2016-07-28 09:28+0200\n" "Last-Translator: Petter Reinholdtsen \n" "Language-Team: Norwegian Bokmål \n" "Language: nb\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" "Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n" "X-Generator: Lokalize 1.5\n" #. type: Plain text msgid "From The Skeptical Inquirer, Fall 1989, Vol. 14, No. 1, Pp. 35-44" msgstr "Fra The Skeptical Inquirer, høsten 1989, vol. 14, no. 1, s. 35-44" #. type: Plain text msgid "The Relativity of Wrong" msgstr "Relativiteten til feil" #. type: Plain text msgid "By Isaac Asimov" msgstr "Av Isaac Asimov. Oversatt til bokmål av Petter Reinholdtsen." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "I RECEIVED a letter the other day. It was handwritten in crabbed penmanship " "so that it was very difficult to read. Nevertheless, I tried to make it out " "just in case it might prove to be important. In the first sentence, the " "writer told me he was majoring in English literature, but felt he needed to " "teach me science. (I sighed a bit, for I knew very few English Lit majors " "who are equipped to teach me science, but I am very aware of the vast state " "of my ignorance and I am prepared to learn as much as I can from anyone, so " "I read on.)" msgstr "" "Jeg fikk et brev her om dagen. Det var håndskrevet med knotete håndskrift " "som gjorde det vanskelig å lese. Jeg forsøkte uansett å forstå hva som sto " "der i tilfelle det skulle vise seg å være noe viktig. I den første " "setningen forklarte forfatteren at han hadde hovedfag i engelsk litteratur " "men følte at han trengte å lære meg naturvitenskap. (Jeg sukket litt, da " "jeg vet veldig få med engelsk hovedfag som er utstyrt til å lære meg " "naturvitenskap. Men jeg er godt kjent med det enorme omfanget av alt jeg " "ikke vet og klar til å lære så mye jeg kan fra hvem det skal være, så jeg " "fortsatte å lese.)" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "It seemed that in one of my innumerable essays, I had expressed a certain " "gladness at living in a century in which we finally got the basis of the " "universe straight." msgstr "" "Det virket som om at jeg i et av mine utallige tekster hadde gitt uttrykk " "for en viss glede over å leve i et århundre hvor vi endelig hadde fått " "grunnlaget for universet riktig." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "I didn't go into detail in the matter, but what I meant was that we now know " "the basic rules governing the universe, together with the gravitational " "interrelationships of its gross components, as shown in the theory of " "relativity worked out between 1905 and 1916. We also know the basic rules " "governing the subatomic particles and their interrelationships, since these " "are very neatly described by the quantum theory worked out between 1900 and " "1930. What's more, we have found that the galaxies and clusters of galaxies " "are the basic units of the physical universe, as discovered between 1920 and " "1930." msgstr "" "Jeg gikk ikke i detaljer, men det jeg mente var at vi nå vet de " "grunnleggende reglene som styrer universet og hvordan gravitasjonen for " "mesteparten virker sammen, slik relativitetsteorien utarbeidet mellom 1905 " "og 1916 viser. Vi kjenner også til de grunnleggende reglene som styrer " "subatomære partikler og deres forhold til hverandre, da disse er svært godt " "beskrevet av kvanteteorien som ble utarbeidet mellom 1900 og 1930. I " "tillegg har vi funnet ut at galakser og samlinger av galakser er de " "grunnleggende enhetene som utgjør det fysiske universet, slik det ble " "oppdaget mellom 1920 og 1930." #. type: Plain text msgid "These are all twentieth-century discoveries, you see." msgstr "Alle disse, ser du, er oppdagelser fra det tyvende århundre." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "The young specialist in English Lit, having quoted me, went on to lecture me " "severely on the fact that in every century people have thought they " "understood the universe at last, and in every century they were proved to be " "wrong. It follows that the one thing we can say about our modern \"knowledge" "\" is that it is wrong. The young man then quoted with approval what " "Socrates had said on learning that the Delphic oracle had proclaimed him the " "wisest man in Greece. \"If I am the wisest man,\" said Socrates, \"it is " "because I alone know that I know nothing.\" the implication was that I was " "very foolish because I was under the impression I knew a great deal." msgstr "" "Etter at den unge engelsk litteraturviteren hadde sitert meg, fortsatte han " "med å belære meg om faktumet at i hvert århundre hadde folk trodd de endelig " "hadde forstått universet, og i hvert eneste århundre hadde det vist seg at " "de tok feil. Konklusjonen er at det eneste vi kan si om vår modere " "«kunnskap» er at den beviselig er feil. Den unge mannen ga deretter sin " "støtte til et sitat fra Sokrates, som hadde kommet med en kommentar da han " "ble kjent med at oraklet i Delfi hadde erklært at han var den viseste mannen " "i Hellas. «Hvis jeg er den viseste mannen», sa Skokrates, «så er det kun på " "grunn av at jeg vet at jeg intet vet.» Implikasjonen var at jeg var svært " "tåpelig som innbilte meg at jeg viste en hel masse." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "My answer to him was, \"John, when people thought the earth was flat, they " "were wrong. When people thought the earth was spherical, they were wrong. " "But if you think that thinking the earth is spherical is just as wrong as " "thinking the earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put " "together.\"" msgstr "" "Jeg svarte ham slik: «Da folk tenkte at jorden var flat, John, så tok de " "feil. Når folk tenkte at orden var sfærisk, så tok de feil. Men hvis du " "tror at det å tenke at jorden er sfærisk er like galt som å tenke at jorda " "er flat, så er ditt syn mer feil enn begge to slått sammen.»" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "The basic trouble, you see, is that people think that \"right\" and \"wrong" "\" are absolute; that everything that isn't perfectly and completely right " "is totally and equally wrong." msgstr "" "Du forstår, det grunnleggende problemet er at folk tenker at «riktig» og " "«galt» er absolutter. Alt alt som ikke er perfekt og fullstendig riktig er " "fullstendig og likeverdig galt." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "However, I don't think that's so. It seems to me that right and wrong are " "fuzzy concepts, and I will devote this essay to an explanation of why I " "think so." msgstr "" "Jeg tror derimot ikke at det er slik. For meg virker det som om riktig og " "feil er uklare konsepter, og jeg vil bruke denne teksten til å forklare " "hvorfor jeg mener dette." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "When my friend the English literature expert tells me that in every century " "scientists think they have worked out the universe and are always wrong, " "what I want to know is how wrong are they? Are they always wrong to the same " "degree? Let's take an example." msgstr "" "Når min venn og engelsk litteraturviter forteller meg at i hvert århundre " "har naturvitenskapsfolk tenkt at de har forstått universet og alltid tatt " "feil, så ønsker jeg å vite hvor feil tok de? Har de alltid tatt like mye " "feil? La oss se på et eksempel." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "In the early days of civilization, the general feeling was that the earth " "was flat. This was not because people were stupid, or because they were " "intent on believing silly things. They felt it was flat on the basis of " "sound evidence. It was not just a matter of \"That's how it looks,\" because " "the earth does not look flat. It looks chaotically bumpy, with hills, " "valleys, ravines, cliffs, and so on." msgstr "" "I sivilisasjonens tidlige dager, var den generelle forståelsen at jorda var " "flat. Det kom ikke av at folk var dumme, eller av at de var bestemt på å " "tro på rare ting. De opplevde at den var flat basert på klare indisier. " "Det var ikke et enkelt spørsmål om «det er slik den ser ut», da jorden jo " "ikke ser flat ut. Den er jo kaotisk humpete, med hauger, daler, " "steinrøyser, klipper og så videre." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Of course there are plains where, over limited areas, the earth's surface " "does look fairly flat. One of those plains is in the Tigris-Euphrates area, " "where the first historical civilization (one with writing) developed, that " "of the Sumerians." msgstr "" "Selvsagt er det sletter der, i begrensede områder, jordens overflate ser " "ganske flat ut. En av disse slettene er i Tigris-Eufrat-området, hvor den " "første historiske sivilisasjonen (en med skriftspråk) ble utviklet seg. " "Dvs. Summererne." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Perhaps it was the appearance of the plain that persuaded the clever " "Sumerians to accept the generalization that the earth was flat; that if you " "somehow evened out all the elevations and depressions, you would be left " "with flatness. Contributing to the notion may have been the fact that " "stretches of water (ponds and lakes) looked pretty flat on quiet days." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Another way of looking at it is to ask what is the \"curvature\" of the " "earth's surface. Over a considerable length, how much does the surface " "deviate (on the average) from perfect flatness. The flat-earth theory would " "make it seem that the surface doesn't deviate from flatness at all, that its " "curvature is 0 to the mile." msgstr "" "En annen måte å se på det er å spørre seg hva «krumningen» for jordens " "overflate er. Over en betydelig avstand, hvor mye avviker overflaten (i " "gjennomsnitt) fra perfekt flathet. Jorden er flat-teorien ville få det til " "å se ut som om overflaten ikke avviker fra flathet i det hele tatt, dvs. at " "dens «krumning» er 0 per mil." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Nowadays, of course, we are taught that the flat-earth theory is wrong; that " "it is all wrong, terribly wrong, absolutely. But it isn't. The curvature of " "the earth is nearly 0 per mile, so that although the flat-earth theory is " "wrong, it happens to be nearly right. That's why the theory lasted so long." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "There were reasons, to be sure, to find the flat-earth theory unsatisfactory " "and, about 350 B.C., the Greek philosopher Aristotle summarized them. First, " "certain stars disappeared beyond the Southern Hemisphere as one traveled " "north, and beyond the Northern Hemisphere as one traveled south. Second, the " "earth's shadow on the moon during a lunar eclipse was always the arc of a " "circle. Third, here on the earth itself, ships disappeared beyond the " "horizon hull-first in whatever direction they were traveling." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "All three observations could not be reasonably explained if the earth's " "surface were flat, but could be explained by assuming the earth to be a " "sphere." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "What's more, Aristotle believed that all solid matter tended to move toward " "a common center, and if solid matter did this, it would end up as a sphere. " "A given volume of matter is, on the average, closer to a common center if it " "is a sphere than if it is any other shape whatever." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "About a century after Aristotle, the Greek philosopher Eratosthenes noted " "that the sun cast a shadow of different lengths at different latitudes (all " "the shadows would be the same length if the earth's surface were flat). From " "the difference in shadow length, he calculated the size of the earthly " "sphere and it turned out to be 25,000 miles in circumference." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "The curvature of such a sphere is about 0.000126 per mile, a quantity very " "close to 0 per mile, as you can see, and one not easily measured by the " "techniques at the disposal of the ancients. The tiny difference between 0 " "and 0.000126 accounts for the fact that it took so long to pass from the " "flat earth to the spherical earth." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Mind you, even a tiny difference, such as that between 0 and 0.000126, can " "be extremely important. That difference mounts up. The earth cannot be " "mapped over large areas with any accuracy at all if the difference isn't " "taken into account and if the earth isn't considered a sphere rather than a " "flat surface. Long ocean voyages can't be undertaken with any reasonable way " "of locating one's own position in the ocean unless the earth is considered " "spherical rather than flat." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Furthermore, the flat earth presupposes the possibility of an infinite " "earth, or of the existence of an \"end\" to the surface. The spherical " "earth, however, postulates an earth that is both endless and yet finite, and " "it is the latter postulate that is consistent with all later findings." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "So, although the flat-earth theory is only slightly wrong and is a credit to " "its inventors, all things considered, it is wrong enough to be discarded in " "favor of the spherical-earth theory." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "And yet is the earth a sphere?" msgstr "Men er virkelig jorden en sfære?" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "No, it is not a sphere; not in the strict mathematical sense. A sphere has " "certain mathematical properties - for instance, all diameters (that is, all " "straight lines that pass from one point on its surface, through the center, " "to another point on its surface) have the same length." msgstr "" "Nei, den er ikke en sfære, ikke i matematisk forstand. En sfære har visse " "matematiske egenskaper - for eksempel har alle diametre (dvs. alle rette " "linjer som går fra et punkt på overflaten, gjennom sentrum, til et annet " "punkt på overflaten) samme lengde." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "That, however, is not true of the earth. Various diameters of the earth " "differ in length." msgstr "" "Dette er derimot ikke riktig for jorden. Forskjellige diametre gjennom " "jorden har ulik lengde." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "What gave people the notion the earth wasn't a true sphere? To begin with, " "the sun and the moon have outlines that are perfect circles within the " "limits of measurement in the early days of the telescope. This is " "consistent with the supposition that the sun and the moon are perfectly " "spherical in shape." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "However, when Jupiter and Saturn were observed by the first telescopic " "observers, it became quickly apparent that the outlines of those planets " "were not circles, but distinct ellipses. That meant that Jupiter and Saturn " "were not true spheres." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Isaac Newton, toward the end of the seventeenth century, showed that a " "massive body would form a sphere under the pull of gravitational forces " "(exactly as Aristotle had argued), but only if it were not rotating. If it " "were rotating, a centrifugal effect would be set up that would lift the " "body's substance against gravity, and this effect would be greater the " "closer to the equator you progressed. The effect would also be greater the " "more rapidly a spherical object rotated, and Jupiter and Saturn rotated very " "rapidly indeed." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "The earth rotated much more slowly than Jupiter or Saturn so the effect " "should be smaller, but it should still be there. Actual measurements of the " "curvature of the earth were carried out in the eighteenth century and Newton " "was proved correct." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "The earth has an equatorial bulge, in other words. It is flattened at the " "poles. It is an \"oblate spheroid\" rather than a sphere. This means that " "the various diameters of the earth differ in length. The longest diameters " "are any of those that stretch from one point on the equator to an opposite " "point on the equator. This \"equatorial diameter\" is 12,755 kilometers " "(7,927 miles). The shortest diameter is from the North Pole to the South " "Pole and this \"polar diameter\" is 12,711 kilometers (7,900 miles)." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "The difference between the longest and shortest diameters is 44 kilometers " "(27 miles), and that means that the \"oblateness\" of the earth (its " "departure from true sphericity) is 44/12755, or 0.0034. This amounts to l/3 " "of 1 percent." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "To put it another way, on a flat surface, curvature is 0 per mile " "everywhere. On the earth's spherical surface, curvature is 0.000126 per mile " "everywhere (or 8 inches per mile). On the earth's oblate spheroidal surface, " "the curvature varies from 7.973 inches to the mile to 8.027 inches to the " "mile." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "The correction in going from spherical to oblate spheroidal is much smaller " "than going from flat to spherical. Therefore, although the notion of the " "earth as a sphere is wrong, strictly speaking, it is not as wrong as the " "notion of the earth as flat." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Even the oblate-spheroidal notion of the earth is wrong, strictly speaking. " "In 1958, when the satellite Vanguard I was put into orbit about the earth, " "it was able to measure the local gravitational pull of the earth--and " "therefore its shape--with unprecedented precision. It turned out that the " "equatorial bulge south of the equator was slightly bulgier than the bulge " "north of the equator, and that the South Pole sea level was slightly nearer " "the center of the earth than the North Pole sea level was." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "There seemed no other way of describing this than by saying the earth was " "pear-shaped, and at once many people decided that the earth was nothing like " "a sphere but was shaped like a Bartlett pear dangling in space. Actually, " "the pear-like deviation from oblate-spheroid perfect was a matter of yards " "rather than miles, and the adjustment of curvature was in the millionths of " "an inch per mile." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "In short, my English Lit friend, living in a mental world of absolute rights " "and wrongs, may be imagining that because all theories are wrong, the earth " "may be thought spherical now, but cubical next century, and a hollow " "icosahedron the next, and a doughnut shape the one after." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "What actually happens is that once scientists get hold of a good concept " "they gradually refine and extend it with greater and greater subtlety as " "their instruments of measurement improve. Theories are not so much wrong as " "incomplete." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "This can be pointed out in many cases other than just the shape of the " "earth. Even when a new theory seems to represent a revolution, it usually " "arises out of small refinements. If something more than a small refinement " "were needed, then the old theory would never have endured." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Copernicus switched from an earth-centered planetary system to a sun-" "centered one. In doing so, he switched from something that was obvious to " "something that was apparently ridiculous. However, it was a matter of " "finding better ways of calculating the motion of the planets in the sky, and " "eventually the geocentric theory was just left behind. It was precisely " "because the old theory gave results that were fairly good by the measurement " "standards of the time that kept it in being so long." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Again, it is because the geological formations of the earth change so slowly " "and the living things upon it evolve so slowly that it seemed reasonable at " "first to suppose that there was no change and that the earth and life always " "existed as they do today. If that were so, it would make no difference " "whether the earth and life were billions of years old or thousands. " "Thousands were easier to grasp." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "But when careful observation showed that the earth and life were changing at " "a rate that was very tiny but not zero, then it became clear that the earth " "and life had to be very old. Modern geology came into being, and so did the " "notion of biological evolution." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "If the rate of change were more rapid, geology and evolution would have " "reached their modern state in ancient times. It is only because the " "difference between the rate of change in a static universe and the rate of " "change in an evolutionary one is that between zero and very nearly zero that " "the creationists can continue propagating their folly." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Since the refinements in theory grow smaller and smaller, even quite ancient " "theories must have been sufficiently right to allow advances to be made; " "advances that were not wiped out by subsequent refinements." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "The Greeks introduced the notion of latitude and longitude, for instance, " "and made reasonable maps of the Mediterranean basin even without taking " "sphericity into account, and we still use latitude and longitude today." msgstr "" "Grekerne introduserte for eksempel begrepene lengdegrad og breddegrad, og " "laget fornuftige kart over middelhavet, uten å ta hensyn til sfæriskiskhet, " "og vi bruker fortsatt lengdegrad og breddegrad i dag." #. type: Plain text msgid "" "The Sumerians were probably the first to establish the principle that " "planetary movements in the sky exhibit regularity and can be predicted, and " "they proceeded to work out ways of doing so even though they assumed the " "earth to be the center of the universe. Their measurements have been " "enormously refined but the principle remains." msgstr "" #. type: Plain text msgid "" "Naturally, the theories we now have might be considered wrong in the " "simplistic sense of my English Lit correspondent, but in a much truer and " "subtler sense, they need only be considered incomplete." msgstr "" "Selvfølgelig kan teoriene vi har nå anses å være feil i den enkle " "betydningen av ordet som min engelske litteraturviterkorrepondent legger opp " "til, men i en mer sannferdig og subtil forståelse bør de bare anses som " "ufullstendige."