Two more index entries.

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 1e2b97b7b720f7ea869c72d01c74c65ec7db2829..e0e75cd29c31c733420ec6310f311475d699acd5 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -2786,6 +2786,7 @@ Edison to the Broadcast Flag: Mechanisms of Consent and Refusal and
 the Propertization of Copyright" (September 2002), University of
 Chicago Law School, James M. Olin Program in Law and Economics,
 Working Paper No. 159.  </para></footnote>
 the Propertization of Copyright" (September 2002), University of
 Chicago Law School, James M. Olin Program in Law and Economics,
 Working Paper No. 159.  </para></footnote>

+<indexterm><primary>General Film Company</primary></indexterm>

 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>


@@ -11180,19 +11181,19 @@ pornography."<footnote><para>
 Brief of Amici Dr. Seuss Enterprise et al., Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537
 U.S.  (2003) (No. 01-618), 19.
 </para></footnote>
 Brief of Amici Dr. Seuss Enterprise et al., Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537
 U.S.  (2003) (No. 01-618), 19.
 </para></footnote>

-That was also the motive of
-the Gershwin estate, which defended its "protection" of the work of
-George Gershwin. They refuse, for example, to license Porgy and Bess
-to anyone who refuses to use African Americans in the cast.<footnote><para>
+That was also the motive of the Gershwin estate, which defended its
+"protection" of the work of George Gershwin. They refuse, for example,
+to license Porgy and Bess to anyone who refuses to use African
+Americans in the cast.<footnote><para>

 <!-- f15. -->
 Dinitia Smith, "Immortal Words, Immortal Royalties? Even Mickey
 Mouse Joins the Fray," New York Times, 28 March 1998, B7.
 </para></footnote>
 That's
 <!-- f15. -->
 Dinitia Smith, "Immortal Words, Immortal Royalties? Even Mickey
 Mouse Joins the Fray," New York Times, 28 March 1998, B7.
 </para></footnote>
 That's

-

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 241 -->
 their view of how this part of American culture should be controlled,
 and they wanted this law to help them effect that control.
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 241 -->
 their view of how this part of American culture should be controlled,
 and they wanted this law to help them effect that control.

+<indexterm><primary>Gershwin, George</primary></indexterm>

 </para>
 <para>
 This argument made clear a theme that is rarely noticed in this
 </para>
 <para>
 This argument made clear a theme that is rarely noticed in this


@@ -13265,6 +13266,7 @@ aim is to build a movement of consumers and producers
 of content ("content conducers," as attorney Mia Garlick calls them)
 who help build the public domain and, by their work, demonstrate the
 importance of the public domain to other creativity.
 of content ("content conducers," as attorney Mia Garlick calls them)
 who help build the public domain and, by their work, demonstrate the
 importance of the public domain to other creativity.

+<indexterm><primary>Garlick, Mia</primary></indexterm>

 </para>
 <para>
 The aim is not to fight the "All Rights Reserved" sorts. The aim is to
 </para>
 <para>
 The aim is not to fight the "All Rights Reserved" sorts. The aim is to