Fix errors detected by 'make lint'.

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 9258f032e2577875048fc6edf1cd33296f34dedb..e3524acbe7f93483b024da84989a41a1fb282e99 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -3329,9 +3329,7 @@ childhood.
 If a country is to be treated as a sovereign, however, then its laws are
 its laws regardless of their source. The international law under which
 these nations live gives them some opportunities to escape the burden
-of intellectual property law.<footnote>
-<indexterm><primary>Drahos, Peter</primary></indexterm>
-<para>
+of intellectual property law.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f2 -->
 See Peter Drahos with John Braithwaite, Information Feudalism: Who
 Owns the Knowledge Economy? (New York: The New Press, 2003), 10&ndash;13,
@@ -3347,6 +3345,7 @@ for public, noncommercial uses without first obtaining the patent
 holder's permission. Developing nations may be able to use this to
 gain the benefits of foreign patents at lower prices. This is a
 promising strategy for developing nations within the TRIPS framework.
+<indexterm><primary>Drahos, Peter</primary></indexterm>
 </para></footnote> In my view, more developing nations should take
 advantage of that opportunity, but when they don't, then their laws
 should be respected. And under the laws of these nations, this piracy
@@ -12716,11 +12715,10 @@ that control.
 <indexterm><primary>Braithwaite, John</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 As Peter Drahos and John Braithwaite relate, this is precisely the
-choice we are now making about intellectual property.<footnote>
-<indexterm><primary>Drahos, Peter</primary></indexterm>
-<para>
+choice we are now making about intellectual property.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f10. -->
 See Drahos with Braithwaite, Information Feudalism, 210&ndash;20.
+<indexterm><primary>Drahos, Peter</primary></indexterm>
 </para></footnote>
 We will have an information society. That much is certain. Our only
 choice now is whether that information society will be free or