From: Petter Reinholdtsen Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:23:36 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Fix errors detected by 'make lint'. X-Git-Tag: edition-2015-10-10~2368 X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/text-free-culture-lessig.git/commitdiff_plain/1ea899c28491287a9ae55a722fcbc824038f245b?ds=inline Fix errors detected by 'make lint'. --- diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml index 9258f03..e3524ac 100644 --- a/freeculture.xml +++ b/freeculture.xml @@ -3329,9 +3329,7 @@ childhood. If a country is to be treated as a sovereign, however, then its laws are its laws regardless of their source. The international law under which these nations live gives them some opportunities to escape the burden -of intellectual property law. -Drahos, Peter - +of intellectual property law. See Peter Drahos with John Braithwaite, Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? (New York: The New Press, 2003), 10–13, @@ -3347,6 +3345,7 @@ for public, noncommercial uses without first obtaining the patent holder's permission. Developing nations may be able to use this to gain the benefits of foreign patents at lower prices. This is a promising strategy for developing nations within the TRIPS framework. +Drahos, Peter In my view, more developing nations should take advantage of that opportunity, but when they don't, then their laws should be respected. And under the laws of these nations, this piracy @@ -12716,11 +12715,10 @@ that control. Braithwaite, John As Peter Drahos and John Braithwaite relate, this is precisely the -choice we are now making about intellectual property. -Drahos, Peter - +choice we are now making about intellectual property. See Drahos with Braithwaite, Information Feudalism, 210–20. +Drahos, Peter We will have an information society. That much is certain. Our only choice now is whether that information society will be free or