Improve index marker placement.

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 39f62086a704f6b7f2235a342bbdf9915197e3a3..cf3b5c34750e9ed7244dc5ef3e008f40d8e0f65b 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -4400,6 +4400,7 @@ from the implications that the copyright warriors would have us draw.
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 96 -->
 <chapter label="6" id="founders">
 <title>CHAPTER SIX: Founders</title>
+<indexterm><primary>Henry V</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 William Shakespeare wrote <citetitle>Romeo and Juliet</citetitle> in 1595. The play
 was first published in 1597. It was the eleventh major play that
@@ -4411,7 +4412,6 @@ even recognize their source.  I once overheard someone commenting on
 Kenneth Branagh's adaptation of Henry V: "I liked it, but Shakespeare
 is so full of clichés."
 </para>
-<indexterm><primary>Henry V</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 In 1774, almost 180 years after <citetitle>Romeo and Juliet</citetitle> was written, the
 "copy-right" for the work was still thought by many to be the exclusive
@@ -4550,6 +4550,7 @@ the work could be translated, or whether Kenneth Branagh would be
 allowed to make his films. The "copy-right" was only an exclusive
 right to print&mdash;no less, of course, but also no more.
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>Henry VIII, King of England</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 Even that limited right was viewed with skepticism by the British.
 They had had a long and ugly experience with "exclusive rights,"
@@ -4563,7 +4564,6 @@ Statute of Monopolies, limiting monopolies to patents for new
 inventions. And by 1710, Parliament was eager to deal with the growing
 monopoly in publishing.
 </para>
-<indexterm><primary>Henry VIII, King of England</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 Thus the "copy-right," when viewed as a monopoly right, was naturally
 viewed as a right that should be limited. (However convincing the