<title>Unregulated copying considered <quote>fair uses.</quote></title>
<graphic fileref="images/1542.svg" align="center" width="40%"></graphic>
</figure>
-<para> </para>
-<figure id="fig-1551">
-<title>Uses that before were presumptively unregulated are now presumptively regulated.</title>
-<graphic fileref="images/1551.svg" align="center" width="40%"></graphic>
-</figure>
<indexterm id='idxcopyrightusagerestrictionsattachedto' class='startofrange'><primary>copyright</primary><secondary>usage restrictions attached to</secondary></indexterm>
<para>
<!-- PAGE BREAK 154 -->
fifth time, you are making a copy of the book contrary to the
copyright owner's wish.
</para>
+<figure id="fig-1551">
+<title>Uses that before were presumptively unregulated are now presumptively regulated.</title>
+<graphic fileref="images/1551.svg" align="center" width="40%"></graphic>
+</figure>
<para>
There are some people who think this makes perfect sense. My aim
just now is not to argue about whether it makes sense or not. My aim
the VCR responsible.
</para>
<para>
-This led Conrad to draw the cartoon below, which we can adopt to
-the DMCA.
+This led Conrad to draw the cartoon in
+<xref linkend="fig-1711-vcr-handgun-cartoonfig"/>, which we can adopt
+to the DMCA.
<indexterm><primary>Conrad, Paul</primary></indexterm>
</para>
<para>
such a use would be good. It, too, is a technology that has both good
and bad uses.
</para>
-<figure id="fig-1711-vcr-handgun-cartoonfig">
+<figure id="fig-1711-vcr-handgun-cartoonfig" float="1">
<title>VCR/handgun cartoon.</title>
-<graphic fileref="images/1711.png" align="center" width="70%"></graphic>
+<graphic fileref="images/1711.png" align="center" width="100%"></graphic>
</figure>
<indexterm><primary>Conrad, Paul</primary></indexterm>
<para>