New post.

diff --git a/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt b/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
index a790b91172d4d14a2bb8b13b5a5407eeaf2f9331..efe4dfad2b769a8f9deb39cd5dfcb3b7efee4c03 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Title: Amazon steal books from customer and throw out her out without any explanation
 Tags: norsk, opphavsrett, personvern
-Date: 2012-10-22 20:20
+Date: 2012-10-22 20:30
 
 <p>A blog post from Martin Bekkelund today tell the story of
 <a href="http://www.bekkelund.net/2012/10/22/outlawed-by-amazon-drm/">how
@@ -9,14 +9,14 @@ and refuse to tell the customer why</a>.  If a real book store did
 this to a customer, it would be called breaking into private property
 and theft.  The story has spread around the net today.  A bit more
 background information is available in Norwegian from
-<Ahref="http://www.digi.no/904658/hun-ble-kastet-ut-av-amazon">digi.no</a>.
-This story is no surprise that digital restriction mechanisms (DRM)
-are used this way, as it has been warned about such abuse since DRM
-was introduced many years back.  And Amazon have proved in 2009 that
-it was willing to
+<a href="http://www.digi.no/904658/hun-ble-kastet-ut-av-amazon">digi.no</a>.
+It is no surprise that digital restriction mechanisms (DRM) are used
+this way, as it has been warned about such abuse since DRM was
+introduced many years back.  And Amazon proved in 2009 that it was
+willing to
 <a href="http://boingboing.net/2009/07/20/amazons-orwellian-de.html">
 break into customers equipment and remove the books</a> people had
-bought, when it removed the book 1984 from all customers who had
+bought, when it removed the book 1984 from all the customers who had
 bought it.  From the official comments, it even sounded like
 <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18amazon.html">Amazon
 would never do that again</a>.  And here we are, three years