Litt mer.

diff --git a/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt b/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
index 921429782ea935f5eed5ac58602736486d16c7ca..a790b91172d4d14a2bb8b13b5a5407eeaf2f9331 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2012-10-22-amazon-steal.txt
@@ -17,13 +17,18 @@ it was willing to
 <a href="http://boingboing.net/2009/07/20/amazons-orwellian-de.html">
 break into customers equipment and remove the books</a> people had
 bought, when it removed the book 1984 from all customers who had
-bought it.  Some even
-<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18amazon.html">believed
-Amazon would never do that again</a>.</p>
+bought it.  From the official comments, it even sounded like
+<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18amazon.html">Amazon
+would never do that again</a>.  And here we are, three years
+later.</p>
 
-<p>And thought this action probably is against Norwegian regulations
-and law, it is according to the terms of use as written by Amazon.
-It is just yet another example of unacceptable terms of use on the web.</p>
+<p>And thought this action is
+<a href="http://www.itavisen.no/904648/forbrukerraadet-helt-haarreisende">against
+Norwegian regulations and law</a>, it is according to the terms of use
+as written by Amazon, and it is hard to hold Amazon accountable to
+Norwegian laws.  It is just yet another example of unacceptable terms
+of use on the web, and how they are used to remove customer
+rights.</p>
 
 <p>Luckily for electronic books, there are alternatives without
 unacceptable terms.  For example