New index entry.

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 9023419e2ff8af45f5c31a02d60f646988512f0a..586d326c0c88a379975e9932eb5c14107ac2863d 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -7128,9 +7128,10 @@ your freedom.
 There's a famous story about a battle between the Marx Brothers
 and Warner Brothers. The Marxes intended to make a parody of
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 159 -->
-<citetitle>Casablanca</citetitle>. Warner Brothers objected. They wrote a nasty letter to the
-Marxes, warning them that there would be serious legal consequences
-if they went forward with their plan.<footnote><para>
+<citetitle>Casablanca</citetitle>. Warner Brothers objected. They
+wrote a nasty letter to the Marxes, warning them that there would be
+serious legal consequences if they went forward with their
+plan.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f19 -->
 See David Lange, "Recognizing the Public Domain," <citetitle>Law and
 Contemporary Problems</citetitle> 44 (1981): 172&ndash;73.
@@ -7141,12 +7142,14 @@ This led the Marx Brothers to respond in kind. They warned
 Warner Brothers that the Marx Brothers "were brothers long before
 you were."<footnote><para>
 <!-- f20 -->
-Ibid. See also Vaidhyanathan, <citetitle>Copyrights and Copywrongs</citetitle>, 1&ndash;3.
+Ibid. See also Vaidhyanathan, <citetitle>Copyrights and
+Copywrongs</citetitle>, 1&ndash;3.
 <indexterm><primary>Vaidhyanathan, Siva</primary></indexterm>
 </para></footnote>
-The Marx Brothers therefore owned the word <citetitle>brothers</citetitle>,
-and if Warner Brothers insisted on trying to control <citetitle>Casablanca</citetitle>, then
-the Marx Brothers would insist on control over <citetitle>brothers</citetitle>.
+The Marx Brothers therefore owned the word
+<citetitle>brothers</citetitle>, and if Warner Brothers insisted on
+trying to control <citetitle>Casablanca</citetitle>, then the Marx
+Brothers would insist on control over <citetitle>brothers</citetitle>.
 </para>
 <para>
 An absurd and hollow threat, of course, because Warner Brothers,
@@ -7166,30 +7169,36 @@ consequence of that is not at all funny.
 </para>
 <indexterm startref="idxwarnerbrothers" class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm startref="idxmarxbrothers" class='endofrange'/>
+
+<indexterm id="idxadobeebookreader" class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>Adobe eBook Reader</primary>
+</indexterm>
 <para>
 Consider the life of my Adobe eBook Reader.
 </para>
 <para>
-An e-book is a book delivered in electronic form. An Adobe eBook
-is not a book that Adobe has published; Adobe simply produces the
-software that publishers use to deliver e-books. It provides the 
-               technology,
-and the publisher delivers the content by using the technology.
+An e-book is a book delivered in electronic form. An Adobe eBook is
+not a book that Adobe has published; Adobe simply produces the
+software that publishers use to deliver e-books. It provides the
+technology, and the publisher delivers the content by using the
+technology.
 </para>
 <para>
 On the next page is a picture of an old version of my Adobe eBook
 Reader.
 </para>
 <para>
-As you can see, I have a small collection of e-books within this 
+As you can see, I have a small collection of e-books within this
 e-book library. Some of these books reproduce content that is in the
-public domain: <citetitle>Middlemarch</citetitle>, for example, is in the public domain.
-Some of them reproduce content that is not in the public domain: My
-own book <citetitle>The Future of Ideas</citetitle> is not yet within the public domain.
-Consider <citetitle>Middlemarch</citetitle> first. If you click on my e-book copy of
+public domain: <citetitle>Middlemarch</citetitle>, for example, is in
+the public domain.  Some of them reproduce content that is not in the
+public domain: My own book <citetitle>The Future of Ideas</citetitle>
+is not yet within the public domain.  Consider
+<citetitle>Middlemarch</citetitle> first. If you click on my e-book
+copy of
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 160 -->
-<citetitle>Middlemarch</citetitle>, you'll see a fancy cover, and then a button at the bottom
-called Permissions.
+<citetitle>Middlemarch</citetitle>, you'll see a fancy cover, and then
+a button at the bottom called Permissions.
 </para>
 <figure id="fig-1611">
 <title>Picture of an old version of Adobe eBook Reader</title>
@@ -7326,11 +7335,9 @@ Wonderland&quot;.</title>
 </figure>
 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 164 -->
-Here was a public domain children's book that you were not 
-               allowed
-to copy, not allowed to lend, not allowed to give, and, as the 
-               "permissions"
-indicated, not allowed to "read aloud"!
+Here was a public domain children's book that you were not allowed to
+copy, not allowed to lend, not allowed to give, and, as the
+"permissions" indicated, not allowed to "read aloud"!
 </para>
 <para>
 The public relations nightmare attached to that final permission.
@@ -7361,6 +7368,7 @@ technology enables control, and Adobe has an incentive to defend this
 control.  That incentive is understandable, yet what it creates is
 often crazy.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref="idxadobeebookreader" class='endofrange'/>
 <para>
 To see the point in a particularly absurd context, consider a favorite
 story of mine that makes the same point.