More XML cleaning.

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index a039e93060704ecb41c6cc38a84ed0c60cdc5ca8..61d439c6df3601fbeedc20f326abf42b0893b3d4 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -12282,23 +12282,21 @@ pharmaceutical patents. The demand of these governments, with the
 United States in the lead, was that South Africa respect these patents
 as it respects any other patent, regardless of any effect on the treatment
 of AIDS within South Africa.<footnote><para>
 United States in the lead, was that South Africa respect these patents
 as it respects any other patent, regardless of any effect on the treatment
 of AIDS within South Africa.<footnote><para>

-<!-- f4. --> International Intellectual Property Institute (IIPI), Patent Protection and
-Access to HIV/AIDS Pharmaceuticals in Sub-Saharan Africa, a Report 
-               Prepared
-for the World Intellectual Property Organization (Washington, D.C.,
-2000), 15.
-</para></footnote>
+<!-- f4. -->
+International Intellectual Property Institute (IIPI), Patent
+Protection and Access to HIV/AIDS Pharmaceuticals in Sub-Saharan
+Africa, a Report Prepared for the World Intellectual Property
+Organization (Washington, D.C., 2000), 15.  </para></footnote>

 </para>
 <para>
 </para>
 <para>

-We should place the intervention by the United States in context.
-No  doubt patents are not the most important reason that Africans
-don't have access to drugs. Poverty and the total absence of an effective
+We should place the intervention by the United States in context.  No
+doubt patents are not the most important reason that Africans don't
+have access to drugs. Poverty and the total absence of an effective

 health care infrastructure matter more. But whether patents are the
 health care infrastructure matter more. But whether patents are the

-most important reason or not, the price of drugs has an effect on their
-demand, and patents affect price. And so, whether massive or 
-               marginal,
-there was an effect from our government's intervention to stop
-the flow of medications into Africa.
+most important reason or not, the price of drugs has an effect on
+their demand, and patents affect price. And so, whether massive or
+marginal, there was an effect from our government's intervention to
+stop the flow of medications into Africa.

 </para>
 <para>
 By stopping the flow of HIV treatment into Africa, the United
 </para>
 <para>
 By stopping the flow of HIV treatment into Africa, the United


@@ -12318,45 +12316,41 @@ parallel import of these drugs would not substantially increase the sales
 by U.S. companies.
 </para>
 <para>
 by U.S. companies.
 </para>
 <para>

-Instead, the argument in favor of restricting this flow of 
-               information,
-which was needed to save the lives of millions, was an argument
+Instead, the argument in favor of restricting this flow of
+information, which was needed to save the lives of millions, was an
+argument

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 267 -->
 about the sanctity of property.<footnote><para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 267 -->
 about the sanctity of property.<footnote><para>

-<!-- f5. --> See Sabin Russell, "New Crusade to Lower AIDS Drug Costs: Africa's
+<!-- f5. -->
+See Sabin Russell, "New Crusade to Lower AIDS Drug Costs: Africa's

 Needs at Odds with Firms' Profit Motive," San Francisco Chronicle, 24
 Needs at Odds with Firms' Profit Motive," San Francisco Chronicle, 24

-May 1999, A1, available at 
-<ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #57</ulink> ("compulsory licenses and gray 
-               markets
-pose a threat to the entire system of intellectual property protection");
-Robert Weissman, "AIDS and Developing Countries: Democratizing 
-               Access
-to Essential Medicines," Foreign Policy in Focus 4:23 (August 1999),
-available at 
-<ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #58</ulink> (describing U.S. policy); John A. Harrelson, "TRIPS,
-Pharmaceutical Patents, and the HIV/AIDS Crisis: Finding the Proper
-Balance Between Intellectual Property Rights and Compassion, a 
-               Synopsis,"
-Widener Law Symposium Journal (Spring 2001): 175.
+May 1999, A1, available at
+<ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #57</ulink>
+("compulsory licenses and gray markets pose a threat to the entire
+system of intellectual property protection"); Robert Weissman, "AIDS
+and Developing Countries: Democratizing Access to Essential
+Medicines," Foreign Policy in Focus 4:23 (August 1999), available at
+<ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #58</ulink>
+(describing U.S. policy); John A. Harrelson, "TRIPS, Pharmaceutical
+Patents, and the HIV/AIDS Crisis: Finding the Proper Balance Between
+Intellectual Property Rights and Compassion, a Synopsis," Widener Law
+Symposium Journal (Spring 2001): 175.

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 333 -->
 </para></footnote>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 333 -->
 </para></footnote>

- It was because "intellectual property"
-would be violated that these drugs should not flow into Africa. It was
-a principle about the importance of "intellectual property" that led
-these government actors to intervene against the South African 
-               response
-to AIDS.
+It was because "intellectual property" would be violated that these
+drugs should not flow into Africa. It was a principle about the
+importance of "intellectual property" that led these government actors
+to intervene against the South African response to AIDS.

 </para>
 <para>
 Now just step back for a moment. There will be a time thirty years
 from now when our children look back at us and ask, how could we have
 </para>
 <para>
 Now just step back for a moment. There will be a time thirty years
 from now when our children look back at us and ask, how could we have

-let this happen? How could we allow a policy to be pursued whose 
-               direct
-cost would be to speed the death of 15 to 30 million Africans, and
-whose only real benefit would be to uphold the "sanctity" of an idea?
-What possible justification could there ever be for a policy that results
-in so many deaths? What exactly is the insanity that would allow so
-many to die for such an abstraction?
+let this happen? How could we allow a policy to be pursued whose
+direct cost would be to speed the death of 15 to 30 million Africans,
+and whose only real benefit would be to uphold the "sanctity" of an
+idea?  What possible justification could there ever be for a policy
+that results in so many deaths? What exactly is the insanity that
+would allow so many to die for such an abstraction?

 </para>
 <para>
 Some blame the drug companies. I don't. They are corporations.
 </para>
 <para>
 Some blame the drug companies. I don't. They are corporations.


@@ -12368,12 +12362,11 @@ a corruption the drug companies are certainly not responsible for.
 </para>
 <para>
 The corruption is our own politicians' failure of integrity. For the
 </para>
 <para>
 The corruption is our own politicians' failure of integrity. For the

-drug companies would love&mdash;they say, and I believe them&mdash;to sell their
-drugs as cheaply as they can to countries in Africa and elsewhere.
-There are issues they'd have to resolve to make sure the drugs didn't get
-back into the United States, but those are mere problems of 
-               technology.
-They could be overcome.
+drug companies would love&mdash;they say, and I believe them&mdash;to
+sell their drugs as cheaply as they can to countries in Africa and
+elsewhere.  There are issues they'd have to resolve to make sure the
+drugs didn't get back into the United States, but those are mere
+problems of technology.  They could be overcome.

 </para>
 <para>
 A different problem, however, could not be overcome. This is the
 </para>
 <para>
 A different problem, however, could not be overcome. This is the


@@ -12397,31 +12390,31 @@ against what we have done, how will we justify what we have done?
 What is the argument?
 </para>
 <para>
 What is the argument?
 </para>
 <para>

-A sensible patent policy could endorse and strongly support the
-patent system without having to reach everyone everywhere in exactly
-the same way. Just as a sensible copyright policy could endorse and
-strongly support a copyright system without having to regulate the
-spread of culture perfectly and forever, a sensible patent policy could
-endorse and strongly support a patent system without having to block
-the spread of drugs to a country not rich enough to afford market
-prices in any case. A sensible policy, in other words, could be a balanced
-policy. For most of our history, both copyright and patent policies were
-balanced in just this sense.
+A sensible patent policy could endorse and strongly support the patent
+system without having to reach everyone everywhere in exactly the same
+way. Just as a sensible copyright policy could endorse and strongly
+support a copyright system without having to regulate the spread of
+culture perfectly and forever, a sensible patent policy could endorse
+and strongly support a patent system without having to block the
+spread of drugs to a country not rich enough to afford market prices
+in any case. A sensible policy, in other words, could be a balanced
+policy. For most of our history, both copyright and patent policies
+were balanced in just this sense.

 </para>
 <para>
 But we as a culture have lost this sense of balance. We have lost the
 </para>
 <para>
 But we as a culture have lost this sense of balance. We have lost the

-critical eye that helps us see the difference between truth and 
-               extremism.
-A certain property fundamentalism, having no connection to our
-tradition, now reigns in this culture&mdash;bizarrely, and with consequences
-more grave to the spread of ideas and culture than almost any other
-single policy decision that we as a democracy will make.
-A simple idea blinds us, and under the cover of darkness, much
-happens that most of us would reject if any of us looked. So uncritically
-do we accept the idea of property in ideas that we don't even notice
-how monstrous it is to deny ideas to a people who are dying without
-them. So uncritically do we accept the idea of property in culture that
-we don't even question when the control of that property removes our
+critical eye that helps us see the difference between truth and
+extremism.  A certain property fundamentalism, having no connection to
+our tradition, now reigns in this culture&mdash;bizarrely, and with
+consequences more grave to the spread of ideas and culture than almost
+any other single policy decision that we as a democracy will make.  A
+simple idea blinds us, and under the cover of darkness, much happens
+that most of us would reject if any of us looked. So uncritically do
+we accept the idea of property in ideas that we don't even notice how
+monstrous it is to deny ideas to a people who are dying without
+them. So uncritically do we accept the idea of property in culture
+that we don't even question when the control of that property removes
+our

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 269 -->
 ability, as a people, to develop our culture democratically. Blindness
 becomes our common sense. And the challenge for anyone who would
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 269 -->
 ability, as a people, to develop our culture democratically. Blindness
 becomes our common sense. And the challenge for anyone who would


@@ -12456,29 +12449,24 @@ Opposes `Open Source' Talks at WIPO," National Journal's Technology
 Daily, 19 August 2003, available at 
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #61</ulink>.
 </para></footnote>
 Daily, 19 August 2003, available at 
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #61</ulink>.
 </para></footnote>

- At the request of a wide range of interests, WIPO had 
-               decided
-to hold a meeting to discuss "open and collaborative projects to
-create public goods." These are projects that have been successful in
-producing public goods without relying exclusively upon a proprietary
-use of intellectual property. Examples include the Internet and the
-World Wide Web, both of which were developed on the basis of 
-               protocols
-in the public domain. It included an emerging trend to support
-open academic journals, including the Public Library of Science 
-               project
+At the request of a wide range of interests, WIPO had decided to hold
+a meeting to discuss "open and collaborative projects to create public
+goods." These are projects that have been successful in producing
+public goods without relying exclusively upon a proprietary use of
+intellectual property. Examples include the Internet and the World
+Wide Web, both of which were developed on the basis of protocols in
+the public domain. It included an emerging trend to support open
+academic journals, including the Public Library of Science project

 that I describe in the Afterword. It included a project to develop
 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are thought to have
 that I describe in the Afterword. It included a project to develop
 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are thought to have

-great significance in biomedical research. (That nonprofit project 
-               comprised
-a consortium of the Wellcome Trust and pharmaceutical and
+great significance in biomedical research. (That nonprofit project
+comprised a consortium of the Wellcome Trust and pharmaceutical and

 technological companies, including Amersham Biosciences, AstraZeneca,
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 270 -->
 Aventis, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Hoffmann-La Roche,
 technological companies, including Amersham Biosciences, AstraZeneca,
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 270 -->
 Aventis, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Hoffmann-La Roche,

-       Glaxo-SmithKline,
-IBM, Motorola, Novartis, Pfizer, and Searle.) It included
-the Global Positioning System, which Ronald Reagan set free in the
-early 1980s. And it included "open source and free software."
+Glaxo-SmithKline, IBM, Motorola, Novartis, Pfizer, and Searle.) It
+included the Global Positioning System, which Ronald Reagan set free
+in the early 1980s. And it included "open source and free software."

 </para>
 <para>
 The aim of the meeting was to consider this wide range of projects
 </para>
 <para>
 The aim of the meeting was to consider this wide range of projects


@@ -12492,61 +12480,52 @@ From the perspective of this book, then, the conference was ideal.<footnote><par
 <!-- f7. --> I should disclose that I was one of the people who asked WIPO for the
 meeting.
 </para></footnote>
 <!-- f7. --> I should disclose that I was one of the people who asked WIPO for the
 meeting.
 </para></footnote>

-The projects within its scope included both commercial and 
-               noncommercial
-work. They primarily involved science, but from many 
-               perspectives.
-And WIPO was an ideal venue for this discussion, since
+The projects within its scope included both commercial and
+noncommercial work. They primarily involved science, but from many
+perspectives.  And WIPO was an ideal venue for this discussion, since

 WIPO is the preeminent international body dealing with intellectual
 property issues.
 </para>
 <para>
 Indeed, I was once publicly scolded for not recognizing this fact
 about WIPO. In February 2003, I delivered a keynote address to a
 WIPO is the preeminent international body dealing with intellectual
 property issues.
 </para>
 <para>
 Indeed, I was once publicly scolded for not recognizing this fact
 about WIPO. In February 2003, I delivered a keynote address to a

-preparatory conference for the World Summit on the Information 
-               Society
-(WSIS). At a press conference before the address, I was asked
-what I would say. I responded that I would be talking a little about the
+preparatory conference for the World Summit on the Information Society
+(WSIS). At a press conference before the address, I was asked what I
+would say. I responded that I would be talking a little about the

 importance of balance in intellectual property for the development of
 importance of balance in intellectual property for the development of

-an information society. The moderator for the event then promptly 
-               interrupted
-to inform me and the assembled reporters that no question
+an information society. The moderator for the event then promptly
+interrupted to inform me and the assembled reporters that no question

 about intellectual property would be discussed by WSIS, since those
 questions were the exclusive domain of WIPO. In the talk that I had
 about intellectual property would be discussed by WSIS, since those
 questions were the exclusive domain of WIPO. In the talk that I had

-prepared, I had actually made the issue of intellectual property 
-               relatively
-minor. But after this astonishing statement, I made intellectual
-property the sole focus of my talk. There was no way to talk about an
-"Information Society" unless one also talked about the range of 
-               information
-and culture that would be free. My talk did not make my 
-               immoderate
-moderator very happy. And she was no doubt correct that the
-scope of intellectual property protections was ordinarily the stuff of
+prepared, I had actually made the issue of intellectual property
+relatively minor. But after this astonishing statement, I made
+intellectual property the sole focus of my talk. There was no way to
+talk about an "Information Society" unless one also talked about the
+range of information and culture that would be free. My talk did not
+make my immoderate moderator very happy. And she was no doubt correct
+that the scope of intellectual property protections was ordinarily the
+stuff of

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 271 -->
 WIPO. But in my view, there couldn't be too much of a conversation
 about how much intellectual property is needed, since in my view, the
 very idea of balance in intellectual property had been lost.
 </para>
 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 271 -->
 WIPO. But in my view, there couldn't be too much of a conversation
 about how much intellectual property is needed, since in my view, the
 very idea of balance in intellectual property had been lost.
 </para>
 <para>

-So whether or not WSIS can discuss balance in intellectual 
-               property,
-I had thought it was taken for granted that WIPO could and
-should. And thus the meeting about "open and collaborative projects to
-create public goods" seemed perfectly appropriate within the WIPO
-agenda.
-</para>
-<para>
-But there is one project within that list that is highly controversial,
-at least among lobbyists. That project is "open source and free 
-               software."
-Microsoft in particular is wary of discussion of the subject. From
-its perspective, a conference to discuss open source and free software
-would be like a conference to discuss Apple's operating system. Both
-open source and free software compete with Microsoft's software. And
-internationally, many governments have begun to explore requirements
-that they use open source or free software, rather than "proprietary
-software," for their own internal uses.
+So whether or not WSIS can discuss balance in intellectual property, I
+had thought it was taken for granted that WIPO could and should. And
+thus the meeting about "open and collaborative projects to create
+public goods" seemed perfectly appropriate within the WIPO agenda.
+</para>
+<para>
+But there is one project within that list that is highly
+controversial, at least among lobbyists. That project is "open source
+and free software."  Microsoft in particular is wary of discussion of
+the subject. From its perspective, a conference to discuss open source
+and free software would be like a conference to discuss Apple's
+operating system. Both open source and free software compete with
+Microsoft's software. And internationally, many governments have begun
+to explore requirements that they use open source or free software,
+rather than "proprietary software," for their own internal uses.

 </para>
 <para>
 I don't mean to enter that debate here. It is important only to make
 </para>
 <para>
 I don't mean to enter that debate here. It is important only to make