-"For of course, the two brilliantly talented creators who made this film "
-"hadn't done what Alben did. They hadn't spent a year clearing the rights to "
-"these clips; technically, what they had done violated the law. Of course, "
-"it wasn't as if they or anyone were going to be prosecuted for this "
-"violation (the presence of 250 judges and a gaggle of federal marshals "
-"notwithstanding). But Nimmer was making an important point: A year before "
-"anyone would have heard of the word Napster, and two years before another "
-"member of our panel, David Boies, would defend Napster before the Ninth "
-"Circuit Court of Appeals, Nimmer was trying to get the judges to see that "
-"the law would not be friendly to the capacities that this technology would "
-"enable. Technology means you can now do amazing things easily; but you "
-"couldn't easily do them legally."
+"<placeholder type=\"indexterm\" id=\"0\"/> <placeholder type=\"indexterm\" "
+"id=\"1\"/> <placeholder type=\"indexterm\" id=\"2\"/> <placeholder type="
+"\"indexterm\" id=\"3\"/> <placeholder type=\"indexterm\" id=\"4\"/> For of "
+"course, the two brilliantly talented creators who made this film hadn't done "
+"what Alben did. They hadn't spent a year clearing the rights to these clips; "
+"technically, what they had done violated the law. Of course, it wasn't as "
+"if they or anyone were going to be prosecuted for this violation (the "
+"presence of 250 judges and a gaggle of federal marshals notwithstanding). "
+"But Nimmer was making an important point: A year before anyone would have "
+"heard of the word Napster, and two years before another member of our panel, "
+"David Boies, would defend Napster before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, "
+"Nimmer was trying to get the judges to see that the law would not be "
+"friendly to the capacities that this technology would enable. Technology "
+"means you can now do amazing things easily; but you couldn't easily do them "
+"legally."