More indexes.

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 4089b58939049a12722f71ff568084bd080f90f0..3e5aa7a77c81be08dbaa002760c7cd6927304646 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -8478,12 +8478,12 @@ means that the law now looks like this:
 </table>
 
 <para>
 </table>
 
 <para>

-Every realm is governed by copyright law, whereas before most 
-               creativity
-was not. The law now regulates the full range of creativity&mdash;
+Every realm is governed by copyright law, whereas before most
+creativity was not. The law now regulates the full range of
+creativity&mdash;

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 183 -->
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 183 -->

-commercial or not, transformative or not&mdash;with the same rules designed
-to regulate commercial publishers.
+commercial or not, transformative or not&mdash;with the same rules
+designed to regulate commercial publishers.

 </para>
 <para>
 Obviously, copyright law is not the enemy. The enemy is regulation
 </para>
 <para>
 Obviously, copyright law is not the enemy. The enemy is regulation


@@ -8494,11 +8494,9 @@ these domains actually does any good.
 <para>
 I have no doubt that it does good in regulating commercial copying.
 But I also have no doubt that it does more harm than good when
 <para>
 I have no doubt that it does good in regulating commercial copying.
 But I also have no doubt that it does more harm than good when

-regulating (as it regulates just now) noncommercial copying and, 
-               especially,
-noncommercial transformation. And increasingly, for the 
-               reasons
-sketched especially in chapters 7 and 8, one might well wonder
+regulating (as it regulates just now) noncommercial copying and,
+especially, noncommercial transformation. And increasingly, for the
+reasons sketched especially in chapters 7 and 8, one might well wonder

 whether it does more harm than good for commercial transformation.
 More commercial transformative work would be created if derivative
 rights were more sharply restricted.
 whether it does more harm than good for commercial transformation.
 More commercial transformative work would be created if derivative
 rights were more sharply restricted.


@@ -8506,58 +8504,57 @@ rights were more sharply restricted.
 <para>
 The issue is therefore not simply whether copyright is property. Of
 course copyright is a kind of "property," and of course, as with any
 <para>
 The issue is therefore not simply whether copyright is property. Of
 course copyright is a kind of "property," and of course, as with any

-property, the state ought to protect it. But first impressions 
-               notwithstanding,
-historically, this property right (as with all property rights<footnote><para>
+property, the state ought to protect it. But first impressions
+notwithstanding, historically, this property right (as with all
+property rights<footnote><para>

 <!-- f36 -->
 <!-- f36 -->

-It was the single most important contribution of the legal realist 
-               movement
-to demonstrate that all property rights are always crafted to balance
-public and private interests. See Thomas C. Grey, "The Disintegration of
-Property," in  Nomos XXII: Property, J. Roland Pennock and John W.
-Chapman, eds. (New York: New York University Press, 1980).
+It was the single most important contribution of the legal realist
+movement to demonstrate that all property rights are always crafted to
+balance public and private interests. See Thomas C. Grey, "The
+Disintegration of Property," in Nomos XXII: Property, J. Roland
+Pennock and John W.  Chapman, eds. (New York: New York University
+Press, 1980).

 </para></footnote>)
 has been crafted to balance the important need to give authors and
 artists incentives with the equally important need to assure access to
 </para></footnote>)
 has been crafted to balance the important need to give authors and
 artists incentives with the equally important need to assure access to

-creative work. This balance has always been struck in light of new 
-               technologies.
-And for almost half of our tradition, the "copyright" did not
-control at all the freedom of others to build upon or transform a creative
-work. American culture was born free, and for almost 180 years our
-country consistently protected a vibrant and rich free culture.
+creative work. This balance has always been struck in light of new
+technologies.  And for almost half of our tradition, the "copyright"
+did not control at all the freedom of others to build upon or
+transform a creative work. American culture was born free, and for
+almost 180 years our country consistently protected a vibrant and rich
+free culture.

 </para>
 <para>
 We achieved that free culture because our law respected important
 limits on the scope of the interests protected by "property." The very
 birth of "copyright" as a statutory right recognized those limits, by
 </para>
 <para>
 We achieved that free culture because our law respected important
 limits on the scope of the interests protected by "property." The very
 birth of "copyright" as a statutory right recognized those limits, by

-granting copyright owners protection for a limited time only (the story
-of chapter 6). The tradition of "fair use" is animated by a similar 
-               concern
-that is increasingly under strain as the costs of exercising any fair
-use right become unavoidably high (the story of chapter 7). Adding
+granting copyright owners protection for a limited time only (the
+story of chapter 6). The tradition of "fair use" is animated by a
+similar concern that is increasingly under strain as the costs of
+exercising any fair use right become unavoidably high (the story of
+chapter 7). Adding

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 184 -->
 statutory rights where markets might stifle innovation is another
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 184 -->
 statutory rights where markets might stifle innovation is another

-       familiar
-limit on the property right that copyright is (chapter 8). And 
-               granting
-archives and libraries a broad freedom to collect, claims of property
-notwithstanding, is a crucial part of guaranteeing the soul of a culture
-(chapter 9). Free cultures, like free markets, are built with property. But
-the nature of the property that builds a free culture is very different
-from the extremist vision that dominates the debate today.
-</para>
-<para>
-Free culture is increasingly the casualty in this war on piracy. In 
-               response
-to a real, if not yet quantified, threat that the technologies of the
-Internet present to twentieth-century business models for producing
-and distributing culture, the law and technology are being transformed
-in a way that will undermine our tradition of free culture. The property
-right that is copyright is no longer the balanced right that it was, or
-was intended to be. The property right that is copyright has become
-unbalanced, tilted toward an extreme. The opportunity to create and
-transform becomes weakened in a world in which creation requires
-permission and creativity must check with a lawyer.
+familiar limit on the property right that copyright is (chapter
+8). And granting archives and libraries a broad freedom to collect,
+claims of property notwithstanding, is a crucial part of guaranteeing
+the soul of a culture (chapter 9). Free cultures, like free markets,
+are built with property. But the nature of the property that builds a
+free culture is very different from the extremist vision that
+dominates the debate today.
+</para>
+<para>
+Free culture is increasingly the casualty in this war on piracy. In
+response to a real, if not yet quantified, threat that the
+technologies of the Internet present to twentieth-century business
+models for producing and distributing culture, the law and technology
+are being transformed in a way that will undermine our tradition of
+free culture. The property right that is copyright is no longer the
+balanced right that it was, or was intended to be. The property right
+that is copyright has become unbalanced, tilted toward an extreme. The
+opportunity to create and transform becomes weakened in a world in
+which creation requires permission and creativity must check with a
+lawyer.

 </para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 185 -->
 </sect2>
 </para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 185 -->
 </sect2>


@@ -8565,79 +8562,80 @@ permission and creativity must check with a lawyer.
 </chapter>
 <chapter id="c-puzzles">
 <title>PUZZLES</title>
 </chapter>
 <chapter id="c-puzzles">
 <title>PUZZLES</title>

-
-<para> </para>
-
+<para></para>

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 186 -->
 <sect1 id="chimera">
 <title>CHAPTER ELEVEN: Chimera</title>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 186 -->
 <sect1 id="chimera">
 <title>CHAPTER ELEVEN: Chimera</title>

-<indexterm><primary>chimeras</primary></indexterm>
-<para>
+<indexterm id="idxchimera" class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>chimeras</primary>
+</indexterm>
+<indexterm id="idxwells" class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>Wells, H. G.</primary>
+</indexterm>
+<indexterm id="idxtcotb" class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>"Country of the Blind, The" (Wells)</primary>
+</indexterm>

 
 

+<para>

 In a well-known short story by H. G. Wells, a mountain climber
 named Nunez trips (literally, down an ice slope) into an unknown and
 isolated valley in the Peruvian Andes.<footnote><para>
 In a well-known short story by H. G. Wells, a mountain climber
 named Nunez trips (literally, down an ice slope) into an unknown and
 isolated valley in the Peruvian Andes.<footnote><para>

-<!-- f1. --> H. G. Wells, "The Country of the Blind" (1904, 1911). See H. G. Wells,
+<!-- f1. -->
+H. G. Wells, "The Country of the Blind" (1904, 1911). See H. G. Wells,

 The Country of the Blind and Other Stories, Michael Sherborne, ed. (New
 York: Oxford University Press, 1996).
 </para></footnote>
 The Country of the Blind and Other Stories, Michael Sherborne, ed. (New
 York: Oxford University Press, 1996).
 </para></footnote>

-The valley is extraordinarily
-beautiful, with "sweet water, pasture, an even climate, slopes of rich
-brown soil with tangles of a shrub that bore an excellent fruit." But the
-villagers are all blind. Nunez takes this as an opportunity. "In the
-Country of the Blind," he tells himself, "the One-Eyed Man is King."
-So he resolves to live with the villagers to explore life as a king.
+The valley is extraordinarily beautiful, with "sweet water, pasture,
+an even climate, slopes of rich brown soil with tangles of a shrub
+that bore an excellent fruit." But the villagers are all blind. Nunez
+takes this as an opportunity. "In the Country of the Blind," he tells
+himself, "the One-Eyed Man is King."  So he resolves to live with the
+villagers to explore life as a king.

 </para>
 <para>
 Things don't go quite as he planned. He tries to explain the idea of
 sight to the villagers. They don't understand. He tells them they are
 </para>
 <para>
 Things don't go quite as he planned. He tries to explain the idea of
 sight to the villagers. They don't understand. He tells them they are

-"blind." They don't have the word blind. They think he's just thick. 
-               Indeed,
-as they increasingly notice the things he can't do (hear the sound
-of grass being stepped on, for example), they increasingly try to control
-him. He, in turn, becomes increasingly frustrated. "`You don't 
-               understand,'
-he cried, in a voice that was meant to be great and resolute, and
-which broke. `You are blind and I can see. Leave me alone!'"
+"blind." They don't have the word blind. They think he's just thick.
+Indeed, as they increasingly notice the things he can't do (hear the
+sound of grass being stepped on, for example), they increasingly try
+to control him. He, in turn, becomes increasingly frustrated. "`You
+don't understand,' he cried, in a voice that was meant to be great and
+resolute, and which broke. `You are blind and I can see. Leave me
+alone!'"

 </para>
 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 187 -->
 </para>
 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 187 -->

-The villagers don't leave him alone. Nor do they see (so to speak)
-the virtue of his special power. Not even the ultimate target of his 
-               affection,
-a young woman who to him seems "the most beautiful thing in
-the whole of creation," understands the beauty of sight. Nunez's 
-               description
-of what he sees "seemed to her the most poetical of fancies,
-and she listened to his description of the stars and the mountains and
-her own sweet white-lit beauty as though it was a guilty indulgence."
-"She did not believe," Wells tells us, and "she could only half 
-               understand,
-but she was mysteriously delighted."
-</para>
-<para>
-When Nunez announces his desire to marry his "mysteriously 
-               delighted"
+The villagers don't leave him alone. Nor do they see (so to speak) the
+virtue of his special power. Not even the ultimate target of his
+affection, a young woman who to him seems "the most beautiful thing in
+the whole of creation," understands the beauty of sight. Nunez's
+description of what he sees "seemed to her the most poetical of
+fancies, and she listened to his description of the stars and the
+mountains and her own sweet white-lit beauty as though it was a guilty
+indulgence."  "She did not believe," Wells tells us, and "she could
+only half understand, but she was mysteriously delighted."
+</para>
+<para>
+When Nunez announces his desire to marry his "mysteriously delighted"

 love, the father and the village object. "You see, my dear," her
 love, the father and the village object. "You see, my dear," her

-father instructs, "he's an idiot. He has delusions. He can't do anything
-right." They take Nunez to the village doctor.
+father instructs, "he's an idiot. He has delusions. He can't do
+anything right." They take Nunez to the village doctor.

 </para>
 <para>
 After a careful examination, the doctor gives his opinion. "His brain
 is affected," he reports.
 </para>
 <para>
 </para>
 <para>
 After a careful examination, the doctor gives his opinion. "His brain
 is affected," he reports.
 </para>
 <para>

-"What affects it?" the father asks.
-"Those queer things that are called the eyes . . . are diseased . . . in
-such a way as to affect his brain."
+"What affects it?" the father asks.  "Those queer things that are
+called the eyes . . . are diseased . . . in such a way as to affect
+his brain."

 </para>
 <para>
 The doctor continues: "I think I may say with reasonable certainty
 </para>
 <para>
 The doctor continues: "I think I may say with reasonable certainty

-that in order to cure him completely, all that we need to do is a simple
-and easy surgical operation&mdash;namely, to remove these irritant bodies
-[the eyes]."
+that in order to cure him completely, all that we need to do is a
+simple and easy surgical operation&mdash;namely, to remove these
+irritant bodies [the eyes]."

 </para>
 </para>

-<indexterm><primary>chimeras</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 "Thank Heaven for science!" says the father to the doctor. They inform
 Nunez of this condition necessary for him to be allowed his bride.
 <para>
 "Thank Heaven for science!" says the father to the doctor. They inform
 Nunez of this condition necessary for him to be allowed his bride.


@@ -8649,11 +8647,12 @@ with two sets of DNA. The DNA in the blood, for example, might be
 different from the DNA of the skin. This possibility is an underused
 
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 188 -->
 different from the DNA of the skin. This possibility is an underused
 
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 188 -->

-plot for murder mysteries. "But the DNA shows with 100 percent 
-               certainty
-that she was not the person whose blood was at the scene. . . ."
+plot for murder mysteries. "But the DNA shows with 100 percent
+certainty that she was not the person whose blood was at the
+scene. . . ."

 </para>
 </para>

-<indexterm><primary>chimeras</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm startref="idxtcotb" class='endofrange'/>
+<indexterm startref="idxwells" class="endofrange"/>

 <para>
 Before I had read about chimeras, I would have said they were
 impossible.  A single person can't have two sets of DNA. The very idea
 <para>
 Before I had read about chimeras, I would have said they were
 impossible.  A single person can't have two sets of DNA. The very idea


@@ -8662,56 +8661,49 @@ can two individuals have the same set of DNA (identical twins), but
 one person can have two different sets of DNA (a chimera). Our
 understanding of a "person" should reflect this reality.
 </para>
 one person can have two different sets of DNA (a chimera). Our
 understanding of a "person" should reflect this reality.
 </para>

-<indexterm><primary>chimeras</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 <para>

-The more I work to understand the current struggle over copyright
-and culture, which I've sometimes called unfairly, and sometimes not
+The more I work to understand the current struggle over copyright and
+culture, which I've sometimes called unfairly, and sometimes not

 unfairly enough, "the copyright wars," the more I think we're dealing
 with a chimera. For example, in the battle over the question "What is
 unfairly enough, "the copyright wars," the more I think we're dealing
 with a chimera. For example, in the battle over the question "What is

-p2p file sharing?" both sides have it right, and both sides have it wrong.
-One side says, "File sharing is just like two kids taping each others'
-records&mdash;the sort of thing we've been doing for the last thirty years
-without any question at all." That's true, at least in part. When I tell my
-best friend to try out a new CD that I've bought, but rather than just
-send the CD, I point him to my p2p server, that is, in all relevant 
-               respects,
-just like what every executive in every recording company no
-doubt did as a kid: sharing music.
+p2p file sharing?" both sides have it right, and both sides have it
+wrong.  One side says, "File sharing is just like two kids taping each
+others' records&mdash;the sort of thing we've been doing for the last
+thirty years without any question at all." That's true, at least in
+part. When I tell my best friend to try out a new CD that I've bought,
+but rather than just send the CD, I point him to my p2p server, that
+is, in all relevant respects, just like what every executive in every
+recording company no doubt did as a kid: sharing music.

 </para>
 <para>
 But the description is also false in part. For when my p2p server is
 </para>
 <para>
 But the description is also false in part. For when my p2p server is

-on a p2p network through which anyone can get access to my music,
-then sure, my friends can get access, but it stretches the meaning of
+on a p2p network through which anyone can get access to my music, then
+sure, my friends can get access, but it stretches the meaning of

 "friends" beyond recognition to say "my ten thousand best friends" can
 get access. Whether or not sharing my music with my best friend is
 "friends" beyond recognition to say "my ten thousand best friends" can
 get access. Whether or not sharing my music with my best friend is

-what "we have always been allowed to do," we have not always been 
-               allowed
-to share music with "our ten thousand best friends."
+what "we have always been allowed to do," we have not always been
+allowed to share music with "our ten thousand best friends."

 </para>
 <para>
 Likewise, when the other side says, "File sharing is just like walking
 into a Tower Records and taking a CD off the shelf and walking out
 </para>
 <para>
 Likewise, when the other side says, "File sharing is just like walking
 into a Tower Records and taking a CD off the shelf and walking out

-with it," that's true, at least in part. If, after Lyle Lovett (finally) 
-               releases
-a new album, rather than buying it, I go to Kazaa and find a free
-copy to take, that is very much like stealing a copy from Tower.
+with it," that's true, at least in part. If, after Lyle Lovett
+(finally) releases a new album, rather than buying it, I go to Kazaa
+and find a free copy to take, that is very much like stealing a copy
+from Tower.

 </para>
 <para>
 
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 189 -->
 But it is not quite stealing from Tower. After all, when I take a CD
 </para>
 <para>
 
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 189 -->
 But it is not quite stealing from Tower. After all, when I take a CD

-from Tower Records, Tower has one less CD to sell. And when I take
-a CD from Tower Records, I get a bit of plastic and a cover, and 
-               something
-to show on my shelves. (And, while we're at it, we could also note
-that when I take a CD from Tower Records, the maximum fine that
-might be imposed on me, under California law, at least, is $1,000. 
-               According
-to the RIAA, by contrast, if I download a ten-song CD, I'm 
-               liable
-for $1,500,000 in damages.)
+from Tower Records, Tower has one less CD to sell. And when I take a
+CD from Tower Records, I get a bit of plastic and a cover, and
+something to show on my shelves. (And, while we're at it, we could
+also note that when I take a CD from Tower Records, the maximum fine
+that might be imposed on me, under California law, at least, is
+$1,000.  According to the RIAA, by contrast, if I download a ten-song
+CD, I'm liable for $1,500,000 in damages.)

 </para>
 </para>

-<indexterm><primary>chimeras</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 The point is not that it is as neither side describes. The point is
 that it is both&mdash;both as the RIAA describes it and as Kazaa
 <para>
 The point is not that it is as neither side describes. The point is
 that it is both&mdash;both as the RIAA describes it and as Kazaa


@@ -8719,7 +8711,6 @@ describes it. It is a chimera. And rather than simply denying what the
 other side asserts, we need to begin to think about how we should
 respond to this chimera. What rules should govern it?
 </para>
 other side asserts, we need to begin to think about how we should
 respond to this chimera. What rules should govern it?
 </para>

-<indexterm><primary>chimeras</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 We could respond by simply pretending that it is not a chimera. We
 could, with the RIAA, decide that every act of file sharing should be
 <para>
 We could respond by simply pretending that it is not a chimera. We
 could, with the RIAA, decide that every act of file sharing should be


@@ -8764,14 +8755,13 @@ D3, available at
 </para></footnote>
 
 </para>
 </para></footnote>
 
 </para>

+<indexterm startref="idxchimera" class='endofirange'/>

 <para>
 <para>

-Alternatively, we could respond to file sharing the way many kids
-act as though we've responded. We could totally legalize it. Let there
-be no copyright liability, either civil or criminal, for making 
-               copyrighted
-content available on the Net. Make file sharing like gossip: 
-               regulated,
-if at all, by social norms but not by law.
+Alternatively, we could respond to file sharing the way many kids act
+as though we've responded. We could totally legalize it. Let there be
+no copyright liability, either civil or criminal, for making
+copyrighted content available on the Net. Make file sharing like
+gossip: regulated, if at all, by social norms but not by law.

 </para>
 <para>
 Either response is possible. I think either would be a mistake.
 </para>
 <para>
 Either response is possible. I think either would be a mistake.