Proof read.

[text-free-culture-lessig.git] / freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 2b669dc2e8e16a82d38281a64e9c9d343c521515..b629800b5d5b03e6049c184c4d5e79df7e0e04da 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -2751,7 +2751,6 @@ access to material from that institution.  Businesses do this all the
 time, enabling employees to have access to material that people
 outside the business can't get. Universities do it as well.
 </para>
-<indexterm startref='idxuniversitycomputernetworksppsharingon' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm id='idxjordanjesse' class='startofrange'><primary>Jordan, Jesse</primary></indexterm>
 <indexterm id='idxmicrosoftnetworkfilesystemof' class='startofrange'><primary>Microsoft</primary><secondary>network file system of</secondary></indexterm>
 <para>
@@ -7554,8 +7553,8 @@ Obviously, however, some uses of a copyrighted book are regulated
 by copyright law. Republishing the book, for example, makes a copy. It
 is therefore regulated by copyright law. Indeed, this particular use stands
 at the core of this circle of possible uses of a copyrighted work. It is the
-paradigmatic use properly regulated by copyright regulation (see first
-diagram on next page).
+paradigmatic use properly regulated by copyright regulation (see 
+diagram <xref xrefstyle="select: labelnumber" linkend="fig-1541"/>).
 </para>
 <indexterm startref='idxderivativeworkspiracyvs4' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm startref='idxpiracyderivativeworkvs4' class='endofrange'/>
@@ -9603,7 +9602,7 @@ on remote topics of science or culture. There is a vast amount of creative
 work spread across the Internet. But as the law is currently crafted, this
 work is presumptively illegal.
 </para>
-<indexterm><primary>Worldcom</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>WorldCom</primary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>copyright infringement lawsuits</primary><secondary>exaggerated claims of</secondary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>copyright infringement lawsuits</primary><secondary>in recording industry</secondary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>doctors malpractice claims against</primary></indexterm>
@@ -9627,7 +9626,7 @@ See Lynne W. Jeter, <citetitle>Disconnected: Deceit and Betrayal at WorldCom</ci
 the settlement, see MCI press release, <quote>MCI Wins U.S. District Court
 Approval for SEC Settlement</quote> (7 July 2003), available at
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #37</ulink>.
-<indexterm><primary>Worldcom</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>WorldCom</primary></indexterm>
 </para></footnote>
 And under legislation being pushed in Congress right now, a doctor who
 negligently removes the wrong leg in an operation would be liable for