Translate a bit more.

[text-free-culture-lessig.git] / freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 6352b91a9d837aa86432eb6d495237f4b126fd18..8247486f0f029ec0360cc19007ae378da2393fe5 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -8855,6 +8855,13 @@ commercial media will refuse one side of a crucial debate the
 opportunity to present its case.  And the courts will defend the
 rights of the stations to be this biased.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f34 -->
+<indexterm><primary>ABC</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Comcast</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Marijuana Policy Project</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>NBC</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>WJOA</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>WRC</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>advertising</primary></indexterm>
 The Marijuana Policy Project, in February 2003, sought to place ads
 that directly responded to the Nick and Norm series on stations within
 the Washington, D.C., area. Comcast rejected the ads as <quote>against
@@ -8879,13 +8886,6 @@ diesel buses. Phillip Matier and Andrew Ross, <quote>Antidiesel Group Fuming
 After Muni Rejects Ad,</quote> SFGate.com, 16 June 2003, available at
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #32</ulink>. The ground
 was that the criticism was <quote>too controversial.</quote>
-<indexterm><primary>ABC</primary></indexterm>
-<indexterm><primary>Comcast</primary></indexterm>
-<indexterm><primary>Marijuana Policy Project</primary></indexterm>
-<indexterm><primary>NBC</primary></indexterm>
-<indexterm><primary>WJOA</primary></indexterm>
-<indexterm><primary>WRC</primary></indexterm>
-<indexterm><primary>advertising</primary></indexterm>
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
 <para>
@@ -9161,13 +9161,13 @@ property, the state ought to protect it. But first impressions
 notwithstanding, historically, this property right (as with all
 property rights<footnote><para>
 <!-- f36 -->
+<indexterm><primary>legal realist movement</primary></indexterm>
 It was the single most important contribution of the legal realist
 movement to demonstrate that all property rights are always crafted to
 balance public and private interests. See Thomas C. Grey, <quote>The
 Disintegration of Property,</quote> in <citetitle>Nomos XXII: Property</citetitle>, J. Roland
 Pennock and John W.  Chapman, eds. (New York: New York University
 Press, 1980).
-<indexterm><primary>legal realist movement</primary></indexterm>
 </para></footnote>)
 has been crafted to balance the important need to give authors and
 artists incentives with the equally important need to assure access to