Two more translated.

[text-free-culture-lessig.git] / freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 04967c2d781119f1d5205ed00644e088902badc0..6f0f1a716bbca91723c8802e371cd68e0cff04ef 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ disinterested, then the story I tell here will trouble you. For the
 changes I describe affect values that both sides of our political
 culture deem fundamental.
 </para>
 changes I describe affect values that both sides of our political
 culture deem fundamental.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>CodePink Women in Peace</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 We saw a glimpse of this bipartisan outrage in the early summer of
 2003. As the FCC considered changes in media ownership rules that
 <para>
 We saw a glimpse of this bipartisan outrage in the early summer of
 2003. As the FCC considered changes in media ownership rules that


@@ -837,27 +838,27 @@ These values built a tradition that, for at least the first 180 years of
 our Republic, guaranteed creators the right to build freely upon their
 past, and protected creators and innovators from either state or private
 control. The First Amendment protected creators against state control.
 our Republic, guaranteed creators the right to build freely upon their
 past, and protected creators and innovators from either state or private
 control. The First Amendment protected creators against state control.

-And as Professor Neil Netanel powerfully argues,<footnote><para>
+And as Professor Neil Netanel powerfully argues,<footnote>
+<indexterm><primary>Netanel, Neil Weinstock</primary></indexterm>
+<para>

 Neil W. Netanel, "Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society," Yale Law
 Journal 106 (1996): 283.
 </para></footnote>
 Neil W. Netanel, "Copyright and a Democratic Civil Society," Yale Law
 Journal 106 (1996): 283.
 </para></footnote>

-copyright law, 
-               properly
-balanced, protected creators against private control. Our tradition
-was thus neither Soviet nor the tradition of patrons. It instead carved out
-a wide berth within which creators could cultivate and extend our culture.
+copyright law, properly balanced, protected creators against private
+control. Our tradition was thus neither Soviet nor the tradition of
+patrons. It instead carved out a wide berth within which creators
+could cultivate and extend our culture.

 </para>
 <para>
 Yet the law's response to the Internet, when tied to changes in the
 </para>
 <para>
 Yet the law's response to the Internet, when tied to changes in the

-technology of the Internet itself, has massively increased the effective
-regulation of creativity in America. To build upon or critique the 
-               culture
-around us one must ask, Oliver Twist&ndash;like, for permission first.
-Permission is, of course, often granted&mdash;but it is not often granted to
-the critical or the independent. We have built a kind of cultural 
-               nobility;
-those within the noble class live easily; those outside it don't. But it
-is nobility of any form that is alien to our tradition.
+technology of the Internet itself, has massively increased the
+effective regulation of creativity in America. To build upon or
+critique the culture around us one must ask, Oliver Twist&ndash;like,
+for permission first.  Permission is, of course, often
+granted&mdash;but it is not often granted to the critical or the
+independent. We have built a kind of cultural nobility; those within
+the noble class live easily; those outside it don't. But it is
+nobility of any form that is alien to our tradition.

 </para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 26 -->
 <para>
 </para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 26 -->
 <para>


@@ -1115,6 +1116,7 @@ entities could bear the burden of the law&mdash;even the burden of the
 Byzantine complexity that copyright law has become. It was just one
 more expense of doing business.
 </para>
 Byzantine complexity that copyright law has become. It was just one
 more expense of doing business.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Florida, Richard</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 But with the birth of the Internet, this natural limit to the reach of
 the law has disappeared. The law controls not just the creativity of
 <para>
 But with the birth of the Internet, this natural limit to the reach of
 the law has disappeared. The law controls not just the creativity of


@@ -1132,7 +1134,9 @@ commercial and noncommercial creativity, the law burdens this
 creativity with insanely complex and vague rules and with the threat
 of obscenely severe penalties. We may
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 33 -->
 creativity with insanely complex and vague rules and with the threat
 of obscenely severe penalties. We may
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 33 -->

-be seeing, as Richard Florida writes, the "Rise of the Creative Class."<footnote><para>
+be seeing, as Richard Florida writes, the "Rise of the Creative Class."<footnote>
+<indexterm><primary>Florida, Richard</primary></indexterm>
+<para>

 <!-- f4 -->
 In The Rise of the Creative Class (New York: Basic Books, 2002),
 Richard Florida documents a shift in the nature of labor toward a
 <!-- f4 -->
 In The Rise of the Creative Class (New York: Basic Books, 2002),
 Richard Florida documents a shift in the nature of labor toward a


@@ -1230,8 +1234,7 @@ genre.
 Steamboat Bill, Jr. appeared before Disney's cartoon Steamboat Willie.
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 36 -->
 The coincidence of titles is not coincidental. Steamboat Willie is a
 Steamboat Bill, Jr. appeared before Disney's cartoon Steamboat Willie.
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 36 -->
 The coincidence of titles is not coincidental. Steamboat Willie is a

-       direct
-cartoon parody of Steamboat Bill,<footnote><para>
+direct cartoon parody of Steamboat Bill,<footnote><para>

 <!-- f2 -->
 I am grateful to David Gerstein and his careful history, described at 
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #4</ulink>.
 <!-- f2 -->
 I am grateful to David Gerstein and his careful history, described at 
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #4</ulink>.


@@ -1242,13 +1245,12 @@ Simpleton" (Delille), "Mischief Makers" (Carbonara), "Joyful Hurry No. 1"
 Straw," was already in the public domain. Letter from David Smith to
 Harry Surden, 10 July 2003, on file with author.
 </para></footnote>
 Straw," was already in the public domain. Letter from David Smith to
 Harry Surden, 10 July 2003, on file with author.
 </para></footnote>

-and both are built upon a 
-               common
-song as a source. It is not just from the invention of synchronized
-sound in The Jazz Singer that we get Steamboat Willie. It is also from
-Buster Keaton's invention of Steamboat Bill, Jr., itself inspired by the
-song "Steamboat Bill," that we get Steamboat Willie, and then from
-Steamboat Willie, Mickey Mouse.
+and both are built upon a common song as a source. It is not just from
+the invention of synchronized sound in The Jazz Singer that we get
+Steamboat Willie. It is also from Buster Keaton's invention of
+Steamboat Bill, Jr., itself inspired by the song "Steamboat Bill,"
+that we get Steamboat Willie, and then from Steamboat Willie, Mickey
+Mouse.

 </para>
 <para>
 This "borrowing" was nothing unique, either for Disney or for the
 </para>
 <para>
 This "borrowing" was nothing unique, either for Disney or for the


@@ -2236,21 +2238,20 @@ York Times, 16 January 2003, G5.
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
 <para>
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
 <para>

-This different cycle is possible because the same commercial 
-               pressures
+This different cycle is possible because the same commercial pressures

 don't exist with blogs as with other ventures. Television and
 newspapers are commercial entities. They must work to keep attention.
 don't exist with blogs as with other ventures. Television and
 newspapers are commercial entities. They must work to keep attention.

-If they lose readers, they lose revenue. Like sharks, they must move on.
+If they lose readers, they lose revenue. Like sharks, they must move
+on.

 </para>
 <para>
 But bloggers don't have a similar constraint. They can obsess, they
 </para>
 <para>
 But bloggers don't have a similar constraint. They can obsess, they

-can focus, they can get serious. If a particular blogger writes a 
-               particularly
-interesting story, more and more people link to that story. And as
-the number of links to a particular story increases, it rises in the ranks
-of stories. People read what is popular; what is popular has been 
-               selected
-by a very democratic process of peer-generated rankings.
+can focus, they can get serious. If a particular blogger writes a
+particularly interesting story, more and more people link to that
+story. And as the number of links to a particular story increases, it
+rises in the ranks of stories. People read what is popular; what is
+popular has been selected by a very democratic process of
+peer-generated rankings.

 </para>
 <para>
 There's a second way, as well, in which blogs have a different cycle
 </para>
 <para>
 There's a second way, as well, in which blogs have a different cycle


@@ -2263,68 +2264,60 @@ have to take the conflict of interest" out of journalism, Winer told me.
 conflict of interest is so easily disclosed that you know you can sort of
 get it out of the way."
 </para>
 conflict of interest is so easily disclosed that you know you can sort of
 get it out of the way."
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>CNN</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 These conflicts become more important as media becomes more
 <para>
 These conflicts become more important as media becomes more

-concentrated (more on this below). A concentrated media can hide
-more from the public than an unconcentrated media can&mdash;as CNN
-admitted it did after the Iraq war because it was afraid of the 
-               consequences
-to its own employees.<footnote><para>
+concentrated (more on this below). A concentrated media can hide more
+from the public than an unconcentrated media can&mdash;as CNN admitted
+it did after the Iraq war because it was afraid of the consequences to
+its own employees.<footnote><para>

 <!-- f19 -->
 Telephone interview with David Winer, 16 April 2003.
 </para></footnote>
 <!-- f19 -->
 Telephone interview with David Winer, 16 April 2003.
 </para></footnote>

-It also needs to sustain a more 
-               coherent
-account. (In the middle of the Iraq war, I read a post on the
-Internet from someone who was at that time listening to a satellite 
-               uplink
-with a reporter in Iraq. The New York headquarters was telling the
-reporter over and over that her account of the war was too bleak: She
-needed to offer a more optimistic story. When she told New York that
-wasn't warranted, they told her that they were writing "the story.")
-</para>
-<para>
-Blog space gives amateurs a way to enter the debate&mdash;"amateur" not
-in the sense of inexperienced, but in the sense of an Olympic athlete,
-meaning not paid by anyone to give their reports. It allows for a much
-broader range of input into a story, as reporting on the Columbia 
-               disaster
-revealed, when hundreds from across the southwest United States
-turned to the Internet to retell what they had seen.<footnote><para>
+It also needs to sustain a more coherent
+account. (In the middle of the Iraq war, I read a post on the Internet
+from someone who was at that time listening to a satellite uplink with
+a reporter in Iraq. The New York headquarters was telling the reporter
+over and over that her account of the war was too bleak: She needed to
+offer a more optimistic story. When she told New York that wasn't
+warranted, they told her that they were writing "the story.")
+</para>
+<para> Blog space gives amateurs a way to enter the
+debate&mdash;"amateur" not in the sense of inexperienced, but in the
+sense of an Olympic athlete, meaning not paid by anyone to give their
+reports. It allows for a much broader range of input into a story, as
+reporting on the Columbia disaster revealed, when hundreds from across
+the southwest United States turned to the Internet to retell what they
+had seen.<footnote><para>

 <!-- f20 -->
 <!-- f20 -->

-John Schwartz, "Loss of the Shuttle: The Internet; A Wealth of 
-               Information
-Online," New York Times, 2 February 2003, A28; Staci D. Kramer,
-"Shuttle Disaster Coverage Mixed, but Strong Overall," Online 
-               Journalism
-Review, 2 February 2003, available at 
+John Schwartz, "Loss of the Shuttle: The Internet; A Wealth of
+Information Online," New York Times, 2 February 2003, A28; Staci
+D. Kramer, "Shuttle Disaster Coverage Mixed, but Strong Overall,"
+Online Journalism Review, 2 February 2003, available at

 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #10</ulink>.
 </para></footnote>
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #10</ulink>.
 </para></footnote>

-And it drives
-readers to read across the range of accounts and "triangulate," as Winer
-puts it, the truth. Blogs, Winer says, are "communicating directly with
-our constituency, and the middle man is out of it"&mdash;with all the 
-               benefits,
-and costs, that might entail.
+And it drives readers to read across the range of accounts and
+"triangulate," as Winer puts it, the truth. Blogs, Winer says, are
+"communicating directly with our constituency, and the middle man is
+out of it"&mdash;with all the benefits, and costs, that might entail.

 </para>
 <para>
 </para>
 <para>

-Winer is optimistic about the future of journalism infected with
-blogs. "It's going to become an essential skill," Winer predicts, for 
-               public
-figures and increasingly for private figures as well. It's not clear that
-"journalism" is happy about this&mdash;some journalists have been told to
-curtail their blogging.<footnote><para>
+Winer is optimistic about the future of journalism infected
+with blogs. "It's going to become an essential skill," Winer predicts,
+for public figures and increasingly for private figures as well. It's
+not clear that "journalism" is happy about this&mdash;some journalists
+have been told to curtail their blogging.<footnote>
+<indexterm><primary>CNN</primary></indexterm>
+<para>

 <!-- f21 -->
 See Michael Falcone, "Does an Editor's Pencil Ruin a Web Log?" New
 York Times, 29 September 2003, C4. ("Not all news organizations have
 <!-- f21 -->
 See Michael Falcone, "Does an Editor's Pencil Ruin a Web Log?" New
 York Times, 29 September 2003, C4. ("Not all news organizations have

-been as accepting of employees who blog. Kevin Sites, a CNN 
-               correspondent
-in Iraq who started a blog about his reporting of the war on March 9,
-stopped posting 12 days later at his bosses' request. Last year Steve 
-               Olafson,
-a Houston Chronicle reporter, was fired for keeping a personal Web log,
-published under a pseudonym, that dealt with some of the issues and
-people he was covering.")
+been as accepting of employees who blog. Kevin Sites, a CNN
+correspondent in Iraq who started a blog about his reporting of the
+war on March 9, stopped posting 12 days later at his bosses'
+request. Last year Steve Olafson, a Houston Chronicle reporter, was
+fired for keeping a personal Web log, published under a pseudonym,
+that dealt with some of the issues and people he was covering.")

 </para></footnote>
 But it is clear that we are still in transition. "A
 
 </para></footnote>
 But it is clear that we are still in transition. "A
 


@@ -2972,12 +2965,10 @@ recorded music, with the public being given lower prices,
                improved
 quality, and a greater choice.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f11 -->
                improved
 quality, and a greater choice.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f11 -->

-Copyright Law Revision: Report to Accompany H.R. 2512, House 
-               Committee
-on the Judiciary, 90th Cong., 1st sess., House Document no. 83,
-(8 March 1967). I am grateful to Glenn Brown for drawing my attention
-to this report.
-</para></footnote>
+Copyright Law Revision: Report to Accompany H.R. 2512, House Committee
+on the Judiciary, 90th Cong., 1st sess., House Document no. 83, (8
+March 1967). I am grateful to Glenn Brown for drawing my attention to
+this report.</para></footnote>

 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>


@@ -3072,28 +3063,28 @@ something for nothing.
 Cable TV was also born of a kind of piracy.
 </para>
 <para>
 Cable TV was also born of a kind of piracy.
 </para>
 <para>

-When cable entrepreneurs first started wiring communities with
-cable television in 1948, most refused to pay broadcasters for the 
-               content
-that they echoed to their customers. Even when the cable 
-               companies
+When cable entrepreneurs first started wiring communities with cable
+television in 1948, most refused to pay broadcasters for the content
+that they echoed to their customers. Even when the cable companies

 started selling access to television broadcasts, they refused to pay
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 73 -->
 for what they sold. Cable companies were thus Napsterizing
 started selling access to television broadcasts, they refused to pay
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 73 -->
 for what they sold. Cable companies were thus Napsterizing

-       broadcasters'
-content, but more egregiously than anything Napster ever did&mdash;
-Napster never charged for the content it enabled others to give away.
+broadcasters' content, but more egregiously than anything Napster ever
+did&mdash; Napster never charged for the content it enabled others to
+give away.

 </para>
 <indexterm><primary>Anello, Douglas</primary></indexterm>
 </para>
 <indexterm><primary>Anello, Douglas</primary></indexterm>

+<indexterm><primary>Burdick, Quentin</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 Broadcasters and copyright owners were quick to attack this theft.
 Rosel Hyde, chairman of the FCC, viewed the practice as a kind of
 "unfair and potentially destructive competition."<footnote><para>
 <!-- f13 -->
 <para>
 Broadcasters and copyright owners were quick to attack this theft.
 Rosel Hyde, chairman of the FCC, viewed the practice as a kind of
 "unfair and potentially destructive competition."<footnote><para>
 <!-- f13 -->

-Copyright Law Revision&mdash;CATV: Hearing on S. 1006 Before the Subcommittee
-on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights of the Senate Committee
-on the Judiciary, 89th Cong., 2nd sess., 78 (1966) (statement of
-Rosel H. Hyde, chairman of the Federal Communications Commission).
+Copyright Law Revision&mdash;CATV: Hearing on S. 1006 Before the
+Subcommittee on Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights of the Senate
+Committee on the Judiciary, 89th Cong., 2nd sess., 78 (1966)
+(statement of Rosel H. Hyde, chairman of the Federal Communications
+Commission).

 </para></footnote>
 There may have been a "public interest" in spreading the reach of cable
 TV, but as Douglas Anello, general counsel to the National Association
 </para></footnote>
 There may have been a "public interest" in spreading the reach of cable
 TV, but as Douglas Anello, general counsel to the National Association


@@ -3117,8 +3108,7 @@ general counsel of the Association of Maximum Service Telecasters, Inc.).
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>

-Again, the demand of the copyright holders seemed reasonable
-enough:
+Again, the demand of the copyright holders seemed reasonable enough:

 </para>
 <blockquote>
 <para>
 </para>
 <blockquote>
 <para>


@@ -3134,61 +3124,55 @@ United Artists Television, Inc.).
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>

-These were "free-ride[rs]," Screen Actor's Guild president 
-               Charlton
-Heston said, who were "depriving actors of compensation."<footnote><para>
+These were "free-ride[rs]," Screen Actor's Guild president Charlton
+Heston said, who were "depriving actors of
+compensation."<footnote><para>

 <!-- f17 -->
 Copyright Law Revision&mdash;CATV, 209 (statement of Charlton Heston,
 president of the Screen Actors Guild).
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
 <para>
 <!-- f17 -->
 Copyright Law Revision&mdash;CATV, 209 (statement of Charlton Heston,
 president of the Screen Actors Guild).
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
 <para>

-But again, there was another side to the debate. As Assistant 
-               Attorney
+But again, there was another side to the debate. As Assistant Attorney

 General Edwin Zimmerman put it,
 </para>
 <blockquote>
 <para>
 General Edwin Zimmerman put it,
 </para>
 <blockquote>
 <para>

-Our point here is that unlike the problem of whether you have
-any copyright protection at all, the problem here is whether 
-               copyright
-holders who are already compensated, who already have a
-monopoly, should be permitted to extend that monopoly. . . . The
+Our point here is that unlike the problem of whether you have any
+copyright protection at all, the problem here is whether copyright
+holders who are already compensated, who already have a monopoly,
+should be permitted to extend that monopoly. . . . The

 
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 74 -->
 question here is how much compensation they should have and
 how far back they should carry their right to compensation.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f18 -->
 
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 74 -->
 question here is how much compensation they should have and
 how far back they should carry their right to compensation.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f18 -->

-Copyright Law Revision&mdash;CATV, 216 (statement of Edwin M. 
-               Zimmerman,
-acting assistant attorney general).
+Copyright Law Revision&mdash;CATV, 216 (statement of Edwin M.
+Zimmerman, acting assistant attorney general).

 </para></footnote>
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>

-Copyright owners took the cable companies to court. Twice the
-Supreme Court held that the cable companies owed the copyright
-owners nothing.
+Copyright owners took the cable companies to court. Twice the Supreme
+Court held that the cable companies owed the copyright owners nothing.

 </para>
 <para>
 It took Congress almost thirty years before it resolved the question
 of whether cable companies had to pay for the content they "pirated."
 </para>
 <para>
 It took Congress almost thirty years before it resolved the question
 of whether cable companies had to pay for the content they "pirated."

-In the end, Congress resolved this question in the same way that it 
-               resolved
-the question about record players and player pianos. Yes, cable
-companies would have to pay for the content that they broadcast; but
-the price they would have to pay was not set by the copyright owner.
-The price was set by law, so that the broadcasters couldn't exercise veto
-power over the emerging technologies of cable. Cable companies thus
-built their empire in part upon a "piracy" of the value created by 
-               broadcasters'
-content.
-</para>
-<para>
-These separate stories sing a common theme. If "piracy"
-means using value from someone else's creative property without 
-               permission
-from that creator&mdash;as it is increasingly described today<footnote><para>
+In the end, Congress resolved this question in the same way that it
+resolved the question about record players and player pianos. Yes,
+cable companies would have to pay for the content that they broadcast;
+but the price they would have to pay was not set by the copyright
+owner.  The price was set by law, so that the broadcasters couldn't
+exercise veto power over the emerging technologies of cable. Cable
+companies thus built their empire in part upon a "piracy" of the value
+created by broadcasters' content.
+</para>
+<para>
+These separate stories sing a common theme. If "piracy" means
+using value from someone else's creative property without permission
+from that creator&mdash;as it is increasingly described
+today<footnote><para>

 <!-- f19 -->
 See, for example, National Music Publisher's Association, The Engine
 of Free Expression: Copyright on the Internet&mdash;The Myth of Free
 <!-- f19 -->
 See, for example, National Music Publisher's Association, The Engine
 of Free Expression: Copyright on the Internet&mdash;The Myth of Free


@@ -3209,23 +3193,21 @@ generation&mdash;until now.
 <sect1 id="piracy">
 <title>CHAPTER FIVE: "Piracy"</title>
 <para>
 <sect1 id="piracy">
 <title>CHAPTER FIVE: "Piracy"</title>
 <para>

-
-There is piracy of copyrighted material. Lots of it. This piracy
-comes in many forms. The most significant is commercial piracy, the
+There is piracy of copyrighted material. Lots of it. This piracy comes
+in many forms. The most significant is commercial piracy, the

 unauthorized taking of other people's content within a commercial
 unauthorized taking of other people's content within a commercial

-context. Despite the many justifications that are offered in its defense,
-this taking is wrong. No one should condone it, and the law should
-stop it.
+context. Despite the many justifications that are offered in its
+defense, this taking is wrong. No one should condone it, and the law
+should stop it.

 </para>
 <para>
 But as well as copy-shop piracy, there is another kind of "taking"
 that is more directly related to the Internet. That taking, too, seems
 wrong to many, and it is wrong much of the time. Before we paint this
 taking "piracy," however, we should understand its nature a bit more.
 </para>
 <para>
 But as well as copy-shop piracy, there is another kind of "taking"
 that is more directly related to the Internet. That taking, too, seems
 wrong to many, and it is wrong much of the time. Before we paint this
 taking "piracy," however, we should understand its nature a bit more.

-For the harm of this taking is significantly more ambiguous than 
-               outright
-copying, and the law should account for that ambiguity, as it has
-so often done in the past.
+For the harm of this taking is significantly more ambiguous than
+outright copying, and the law should account for that ambiguity, as it
+has so often done in the past.

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 76 -->
 </para>
 <sect2 id="piracy-i">
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 76 -->
 </para>
 <sect2 id="piracy-i">


@@ -3462,7 +3444,7 @@ of the Napster technology had not made any major technological
 Like every great advance in innovation on the Internet (and, 
                arguably,
 off the Internet as well<footnote><para>
 Like every great advance in innovation on the Internet (and, 
                arguably,
 off the Internet as well<footnote><para>

-<!-- f5  -->
+<!-- f5 -->

 See Clayton M. Christensen, The Innovator's Dilemma: The Revolutionary
 National Bestseller That Changed the Way We Do Business (New York:
 HarperBusiness, 2000). Professor Christensen examines why companies
 See Clayton M. Christensen, The Innovator's Dilemma: The Revolutionary
 National Bestseller That Changed the Way We Do Business (New York:
 HarperBusiness, 2000). Professor Christensen examines why companies


@@ -3715,19 +3697,20 @@ could account for this drop. SoundScan, for example, reports a more
 than 20 percent drop in the number of CDs released since 1999. That
 no doubt accounts for some of the decrease in sales. Rising prices could
 account for at least some of the loss. "From 1999 to 2001, the average
 than 20 percent drop in the number of CDs released since 1999. That
 no doubt accounts for some of the decrease in sales. Rising prices could
 account for at least some of the loss. "From 1999 to 2001, the average

-price of a CD rose 7.2 percent, from $13.04 to $14.19."<footnote><para>
+price of a CD rose 7.2 percent, from $13.04 to $14.19."<footnote>

 <!-- f13 -->
 <!-- f13 -->

+<indexterm><primary>Black, Jane</primary></indexterm>
+<para>

 Jane Black, "Big Music's Broken Record," BusinessWeek online, 13 
 Jane Black, "Big Music's Broken Record," BusinessWeek online, 13 

-               February
-2003, available at 
+February 2003, available at 

 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #17</ulink>.
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #17</ulink>.

-</para></footnote>
-Competition
-from other forms of media could also account for some of the decline.
-As Jane Black of BusinessWeek notes, "The soundtrack to the film High
-Fidelity has a list price of $18.98. You could get the whole movie [on
-DVD] for $19.99."<footnote><para>
-<!-- f14  -->
+</para>
+</footnote>
+Competition from other forms of media could also account for some of the
+decline. As Jane Black of BusinessWeek notes, "The soundtrack to the film
+High Fidelity has a list price of $18.98. You could get the whole movie
+[on DVD] for $19.99."<footnote><para>
+<!-- f14 -->

 Ibid.
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
 Ibid.
 </para></footnote>
 </para>


@@ -3976,21 +3959,19 @@ would assure compensation without giving the past (broadcasters)
                control
 over the future (cable).
 </para>
                control
 over the future (cable).
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Betamax</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 <para>

-In the same year that Congress struck this balance, two major 
-               producers
-and distributors of film content filed a lawsuit against another
-technology, the video tape recorder (VTR, or as we refer to them today,
-VCRs) that Sony had produced, the Betamax. Disney's and Universal's
-claim against Sony was relatively simple: Sony produced a device, 
-               Disney
-and Universal claimed, that enabled consumers to engage in 
-               copyright
-infringement. Because the device that Sony built had a "record"
-button, the device could be used to record copyrighted movies and
-shows. Sony was therefore benefiting from the copyright infringement
-of its customers. It should therefore, Disney and Universal claimed, be
-partially liable for that infringement.
+In the same year that Congress struck this balance, two major
+producers and distributors of film content filed a lawsuit against
+another technology, the video tape recorder (VTR, or as we refer to
+them today, VCRs) that Sony had produced, the Betamax. Disney's and
+Universal's claim against Sony was relatively simple: Sony produced a
+device, Disney and Universal claimed, that enabled consumers to engage
+in copyright infringement. Because the device that Sony built had a
+"record" button, the device could be used to record copyrighted movies
+and shows. Sony was therefore benefiting from the copyright
+infringement of its customers. It should therefore, Disney and
+Universal claimed, be partially liable for that infringement.

 </para>
 <para>
 There was something to Disney's and Universal's claim. Sony did
 </para>
 <para>
 There was something to Disney's and Universal's claim. Sony did


@@ -4003,31 +3984,27 @@ grant anyone permission to copy. Indeed, if anyone had asked, no
 doubt the majority of shows would not have authorized copying. And
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 89 -->
 in the face of this obvious preference, Sony could have designed its
 doubt the majority of shows would not have authorized copying. And
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 89 -->
 in the face of this obvious preference, Sony could have designed its

-       system
-to minimize the opportunity for copyright infringement. It did
+system to minimize the opportunity for copyright infringement. It did

 not, and for that, Disney and Universal wanted to hold it responsible
 for the architecture it chose.
 </para>
 <para>
 MPAA president Jack Valenti became the studios' most vocal
 not, and for that, Disney and Universal wanted to hold it responsible
 for the architecture it chose.
 </para>
 <para>
 MPAA president Jack Valenti became the studios' most vocal

-champion. Valenti called VCRs "tapeworms." He warned, "When
-there are 20, 30, 40 million of these VCRs in the land, we will be 
-               invaded
-by millions of `tapeworms,' eating away at the very heart and
-essence of the most precious asset the copyright owner has, his 
-               copyright."<footnote><para>
+champion. Valenti called VCRs "tapeworms." He warned, "When there are
+20, 30, 40 million of these VCRs in the land, we will be invaded by
+millions of `tapeworms,' eating away at the very heart and essence of
+the most precious asset the copyright owner has, his
+copyright."<footnote><para>

 <!-- f18 -->
 Copyright Infringements (Audio and Video Recorders): Hearing on
 S. 1758 Before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 97th Cong., 1st
 and 2nd sess., 459 (1982) (testimony of Jack Valenti, president, Motion
 Picture Association of America, Inc.).
 </para></footnote>
 <!-- f18 -->
 Copyright Infringements (Audio and Video Recorders): Hearing on
 S. 1758 Before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 97th Cong., 1st
 and 2nd sess., 459 (1982) (testimony of Jack Valenti, president, Motion
 Picture Association of America, Inc.).
 </para></footnote>

-"One does not have to be trained in sophisticated marketing
-and creative judgment," he told Congress, "to understand the 
-               devastation
-on the after-theater marketplace caused by the hundreds of 
-               millions
-of tapings that will adversely impact on the future of the creative
+"One does not have to be trained in sophisticated marketing and
+creative judgment," he told Congress, "to understand the devastation
+on the after-theater marketplace caused by the hundreds of millions of
+tapings that will adversely impact on the future of the creative

 community in this country. It is simply a question of basic economics
 and plain common sense."<footnote><para>
 <!-- f19 -->
 community in this country. It is simply a question of basic economics
 and plain common sense."<footnote><para>
 <!-- f19 -->


@@ -4734,6 +4711,7 @@ Crown coveted to the free culture that we inherited.
 The fight to defend the limits of the Statute of Anne was not to end
 there, however, and it is here that Donaldson enters the mix.
 </para>
 The fight to defend the limits of the Statute of Anne was not to end
 there, however, and it is here that Donaldson enters the mix.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Beckett, Thomas</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 Millar died soon after his victory, so his case was not appealed. His
 estate sold Thomson's poems to a syndicate of printers that included
 <para>
 Millar died soon after his victory, so his case was not appealed. His
 estate sold Thomson's poems to a syndicate of printers that included


@@ -5065,6 +5043,7 @@ into a sword that interferes with any use, transformative or not.
 <sect1 id="transformers">
 <title>CHAPTER EIGHT: Transformers</title>
 <indexterm><primary>Allen, Paul</primary></indexterm>
 <sect1 id="transformers">
 <title>CHAPTER EIGHT: Transformers</title>
 <indexterm><primary>Allen, Paul</primary></indexterm>

+<indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 In 1993, Alex Alben was a lawyer working at Starwave, Inc.  Starwave
 was an innovative company founded by Microsoft cofounder Paul Allen to
 <para>
 In 1993, Alex Alben was a lawyer working at Starwave, Inc.  Starwave
 was an innovative company founded by Microsoft cofounder Paul Allen to


@@ -5072,22 +5051,21 @@ develop digital entertainment. Long before the Internet became
 popular, Starwave began investing in new technology for delivering
 entertainment in anticipation of the power of networks.
 </para>
 popular, Starwave began investing in new technology for delivering
 entertainment in anticipation of the power of networks.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 Alben had a special interest in new technology. He was intrigued by
 the emerging market for CD-ROM technology&mdash;not to distribute
 <para>
 Alben had a special interest in new technology. He was intrigued by
 the emerging market for CD-ROM technology&mdash;not to distribute

-film, but to do things with film that otherwise would be very difficult.
-In 1993, he launched an initiative to develop a product to build 
-               retrospectives
-on the work of particular actors. The first actor chosen was
-Clint Eastwood. The idea was to showcase all of the work of 
-               Eastwood,
-with clips from his films and interviews with figures important
-to his career.
-</para>
-<para>
-At that time, Eastwood had made more than fifty films, as an actor
-and as a director. Alben began with a series of interviews with 
-               Eastwood,
+film, but to do things with film that otherwise would be very
+difficult.  In 1993, he launched an initiative to develop a product to
+build retrospectives on the work of particular actors. The first actor
+chosen was Clint Eastwood. The idea was to showcase all of the work of
+Eastwood, with clips from his films and interviews with figures
+important to his career.
+</para>
+<indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>
+<para>
+At that time, Eastwood had made more than fifty films, as an actor and
+as a director. Alben began with a series of interviews with Eastwood,

 asking him about his career. Because Starwave produced those
 interviews, it was free to include them on the CD.
 </para>
 asking him about his career. Because Starwave produced those
 interviews, it was free to include them on the CD.
 </para>


@@ -5099,19 +5077,21 @@ posters, scripts, and other material relating to the films Eastwood
 made. Most of his career was spent at Warner Brothers, and so it was
 relatively easy to get permission for that content.
 </para>
 made. Most of his career was spent at Warner Brothers, and so it was
 relatively easy to get permission for that content.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 Then Alben and his team decided to include actual film clips. "Our
 <para>
 Then Alben and his team decided to include actual film clips. "Our

-goal was that we were going to have a clip from every one of 
-               Eastwood's
-films," Alben told me. It was here that the problem arose. "No
-one had ever really done this before," Alben explained. "No one had
-ever tried to do this in the context of an artistic look at an actor's
-career."
+goal was that we were going to have a clip from every one of
+Eastwood's films," Alben told me. It was here that the problem
+arose. "No one had ever really done this before," Alben explained. "No
+one had ever tried to do this in the context of an artistic look at an
+actor's career."

 </para>
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 Alben brought the idea to Michael Slade, the CEO of Starwave.
 Slade asked, "Well, what will it take?"
 </para>
 <para>
 Alben brought the idea to Michael Slade, the CEO of Starwave.
 Slade asked, "Well, what will it take?"
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 Alben replied, "Well, we're going to have to clear rights from
 everyone who appears in these films, and the music and everything
 <para>
 Alben replied, "Well, we're going to have to clear rights from
 everyone who appears in these films, and the music and everything


@@ -5143,15 +5123,12 @@ tale, Alben recounted just what they did:
 </para>
 <blockquote>
 <para>
 </para>
 <blockquote>
 <para>

-So we very mechanically went about looking up the film clips.
-We made some artistic decisions about what film clips to 
-               include&mdash;of
-course we were going to use the "Make my day" clip
-from Dirty Harry. But you then need to get the guy on the ground
-who's wiggling under the gun and you need to get his 
-               permission.
-And then you have to decide what you are going to pay
-him.
+So we very mechanically went about looking up the film clips.  We made
+some artistic decisions about what film clips to include&mdash;of
+course we were going to use the "Make my day" clip from Dirty
+Harry. But you then need to get the guy on the ground who's wiggling
+under the gun and you need to get his permission.  And then you have
+to decide what you are going to pay him.

 </para>
 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 113 -->
 </para>
 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 113 -->


@@ -5167,6 +5144,7 @@ And then we just, we put together a team, my assistant and some
 others, and we just started calling people.
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 others, and we just started calling people.
 </para>
 </blockquote>

+<indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 Some actors were glad to help&mdash;Donald Sutherland, for example,
 followed up himself to be sure that the rights had been cleared.
 <para>
 Some actors were glad to help&mdash;Donald Sutherland, for example,
 followed up himself to be sure that the rights had been cleared.


@@ -5182,6 +5160,7 @@ career.
 It was one year later&mdash;"and even then we weren't sure whether we
 were totally in the clear."
 </para>
 It was one year later&mdash;"and even then we weren't sure whether we
 were totally in the clear."
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 Alben is proud of his work. The project was the first of its kind and
 the only time he knew of that a team had undertaken such a massive
 <para>
 Alben is proud of his work. The project was the first of its kind and
 the only time he knew of that a team had undertaken such a massive


@@ -5189,14 +5168,13 @@ project for the purpose of releasing a retrospective.
 </para>
 <blockquote>
 <para>
 </para>
 <blockquote>
 <para>

-Everyone thought it would be too hard. Everyone just threw up
-their hands and said, "Oh, my gosh, a film, it's so many 
-               copyrights,
-there's the music, there's the screenplay, there's the director,
-there's the actors." But we just broke it down. We just put it into
-its constituent parts and said, "Okay, there's this many actors, this
-many directors, . . . this many musicians," and we just went at it
-very systematically and cleared the rights.
+Everyone thought it would be too hard. Everyone just threw up their
+hands and said, "Oh, my gosh, a film, it's so many copyrights, there's
+the music, there's the screenplay, there's the director, there's the
+actors." But we just broke it down. We just put it into its
+constituent parts and said, "Okay, there's this many actors, this many
+directors, . . . this many musicians," and we just went at it very
+systematically and cleared the rights.

 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>


@@ -5205,13 +5183,13 @@ very systematically and cleared the rights.
 And no doubt, the product itself was exceptionally good. Eastwood
 loved it, and it sold very well.
 </para>
 And no doubt, the product itself was exceptionally good. Eastwood
 loved it, and it sold very well.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 But I pressed Alben about how weird it seems that it would have to
 <para>
 But I pressed Alben about how weird it seems that it would have to

-take a year's work simply to clear rights. No doubt Alben had done this
-efficiently, but as Peter Drucker has famously quipped, "There is 
-               nothing
-so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at
-all."<footnote><para>
+take a year's work simply to clear rights. No doubt Alben had done
+this efficiently, but as Peter Drucker has famously quipped, "There is
+nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done
+at all."<footnote><para>

 <!-- f2 -->
 U.S. Department of Commerce Office of Acquisition Management, Seven
 Steps to Performance-Based Services Acquisition, available at 
 <!-- f2 -->
 U.S. Department of Commerce Office of Acquisition Management, Seven
 Steps to Performance-Based Services Acquisition, available at 


@@ -5271,25 +5249,23 @@ going to hold me up for money," then it becomes difficult to put
 one of these things together.
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 one of these things together.
 </para>
 </blockquote>

-<para>
-Alben worked for a big company. His company was backed by some
-of the richest investors in the world. He therefore had authority and
-access that the average Web designer would not have. So if it took him
-a year, how long would it take someone else? And how much creativity
-is never made just because the costs of clearing the rights are so high?
-These costs are the burdens of a kind of regulation. Put on a 
-               Republican
-hat for a moment, and get angry for a bit. The government
+<indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>
+<para>
+Alben worked for a big company. His company was backed by some of the
+richest investors in the world. He therefore had authority and access
+that the average Web designer would not have. So if it took him a
+year, how long would it take someone else? And how much creativity is
+never made just because the costs of clearing the rights are so high?
+These costs are the burdens of a kind of regulation. Put on a
+Republican hat for a moment, and get angry for a bit. The government

 defines the scope of these rights, and the scope defined determines
 defines the scope of these rights, and the scope defined determines

-how much it's going to cost to negotiate them. (Remember the idea
-that land runs to the heavens, and imagine the pilot purchasing 
-               flythrough
+how much it's going to cost to negotiate them. (Remember the idea that
+land runs to the heavens, and imagine the pilot purchasing flythrough

 rights as he negotiates to fly from Los Angeles to San Francisco.)
 These rights might well have once made sense; but as circumstances
 rights as he negotiates to fly from Los Angeles to San Francisco.)
 These rights might well have once made sense; but as circumstances

-change, they make no sense at all. Or at least, a well-trained, 
-               regulationminimizing
-Republican should look at the rights and ask, "Does this
-still make sense?"
+change, they make no sense at all. Or at least, a well-trained,
+regulationminimizing Republican should look at the rights and ask,
+"Does this still make sense?"

 </para>
 <para>
 I've seen the flash of recognition when people get this point, but only
 </para>
 <para>
 I've seen the flash of recognition when people get this point, but only


@@ -5307,6 +5283,7 @@ twentieth century, all framed around the idea of a 60 Minutes episode.
 The execution was perfect, down to the sixty-minute stopwatch. The
 judges loved every minute of it.
 </para>
 The execution was perfect, down to the sixty-minute stopwatch. The
 judges loved every minute of it.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Nimmer, David</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 When the lights came up, I looked over to my copanelist, David
 Nimmer, perhaps the leading copyright scholar and practitioner in the
 <para>
 When the lights came up, I looked over to my copanelist, David
 Nimmer, perhaps the leading copyright scholar and practitioner in the


@@ -5315,22 +5292,21 @@ room of over 250 well-entertained judges. Taking an ominous tone, he
 began his talk with a question: "Do you know how many federal laws
 were just violated in this room?"
 </para>
 began his talk with a question: "Do you know how many federal laws
 were just violated in this room?"
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Boies, David</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 For of course, the two brilliantly talented creators who made this
 film hadn't done what Alben did. They hadn't spent a year clearing the
 <para>
 For of course, the two brilliantly talented creators who made this
 film hadn't done what Alben did. They hadn't spent a year clearing the

-rights to these clips; technically, what they had done violated the law.
-Of course, it wasn't as if they or anyone were going to be prosecuted for
-this violation (the presence of 250 judges and a gaggle of federal 
-               marshals
-notwithstanding). But Nimmer was making an important point:
-A year before anyone would have heard of the word Napster, and two
-years before another member of our panel, David Boies, would defend
-Napster before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Nimmer was 
-               trying
-to get the judges to see that the law would not be friendly to the
-capacities that this technology would enable. Technology means you
-can now do amazing things easily; but you couldn't easily do them
-legally.
+rights to these clips; technically, what they had done violated the
+law.  Of course, it wasn't as if they or anyone were going to be
+prosecuted for this violation (the presence of 250 judges and a gaggle
+of federal marshals notwithstanding). But Nimmer was making an
+important point: A year before anyone would have heard of the word
+Napster, and two years before another member of our panel, David
+Boies, would defend Napster before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals,
+Nimmer was trying to get the judges to see that the law would not be
+friendly to the capacities that this technology would
+enable. Technology means you can now do amazing things easily; but you
+couldn't easily do them legally.

 </para>
 <para>
 We live in a "cut and paste" culture enabled by technology. Anyone
 </para>
 <para>
 We live in a "cut and paste" culture enabled by technology. Anyone


@@ -5342,14 +5318,13 @@ planted in your presentation.
 <para>
 But presentations are just a tiny beginning. Using the Internet and
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 117 -->
 <para>
 But presentations are just a tiny beginning. Using the Internet and
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 117 -->

-its archives, musicians are able to string together mixes of sound never
-before imagined; filmmakers are able to build movies out of clips on
-computers around the world. An extraordinary site in Sweden takes
-images of politicians and blends them with music to create biting 
-               political
-commentary. A site called Camp Chaos has produced some of
-the most biting criticism of the record industry that there is through
-the mixing of Flash! and music.
+its archives, musicians are able to string together mixes of sound
+never before imagined; filmmakers are able to build movies out of
+clips on computers around the world. An extraordinary site in Sweden
+takes images of politicians and blends them with music to create
+biting political commentary. A site called Camp Chaos has produced
+some of the most biting criticism of the record industry that there is
+through the mixing of Flash! and music.

 </para>
 <para>
 All of these creations are technically illegal. Even if the creators
 </para>
 <para>
 All of these creations are technically illegal. Even if the creators


@@ -5359,21 +5334,19 @@ never made. And for that part that is made, if it doesn't follow the
 clearance rules, it doesn't get released.
 </para>
 <para>
 clearance rules, it doesn't get released.
 </para>
 <para>

-To  some, these stories suggest a solution: Let's alter the mix of
-rights so that people are free to build upon our culture. Free to add or
-mix as they see fit. We could even make this change without 
-               necessarily
-requiring that the "free" use be free as in "free beer." Instead, the 
-               system
-could simply make it easy for follow-on creators to compensate
-artists without requiring an army of lawyers to come along: a rule, for
-example, that says "the royalty owed the copyright owner of an 
-               unregistered
-work for the derivative reuse of his work will be a flat 1 percent
-of net revenues, to be held in escrow for the copyright owner." Under
-this rule, the copyright owner could benefit from some royalty, but he
-would not have the benefit of a full property right (meaning the right
-to name his own price) unless he registers the work.
+To some, these stories suggest a solution: Let's alter the mix of
+rights so that people are free to build upon our culture. Free to add
+or mix as they see fit. We could even make this change without
+necessarily requiring that the "free" use be free as in "free beer."
+Instead, the system could simply make it easy for follow-on creators
+to compensate artists without requiring an army of lawyers to come
+along: a rule, for example, that says "the royalty owed the copyright
+owner of an unregistered work for the derivative reuse of his work
+will be a flat 1 percent of net revenues, to be held in escrow for the
+copyright owner." Under this rule, the copyright owner could benefit
+from some royalty, but he would not have the benefit of a full
+property right (meaning the right to name his own price) unless he
+registers the work.

 </para>
 <para>
 Who could possibly object to this? And what reason would there be
 </para>
 <para>
 Who could possibly object to this? And what reason would there be


@@ -5382,37 +5355,32 @@ which if made, under this plan, would produce new income for artists.
 What reason would anyone have to oppose it?
 </para>
 <para>
 What reason would anyone have to oppose it?
 </para>
 <para>

-In February 2003, DreamWorks studios announced an 
-               agreement
-with Mike Myers, the comic genius of Saturday Night Live and
+In February 2003, DreamWorks studios announced an agreement with Mike
+Myers, the comic genius of Saturday Night Live and

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 118 -->
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 118 -->

-Austin Powers. According to the announcement, Myers and
-       Dream-Works
-would work together to form a "unique filmmaking pact." Under
-the agreement, DreamWorks "will acquire the rights to existing motion
-picture hits and classics, write new storylines and&mdash;with the use of 
-               stateof-the-art
-digital technology&mdash;insert Myers and other actors into the
-film, thereby creating an entirely new piece of entertainment."
-</para>
-<para>
-The announcement called this "film sampling." As Myers 
-               explained,
-"Film Sampling is an exciting way to put an original spin on
-existing films and allow audiences to see old movies in a new light. Rap
+Austin Powers. According to the announcement, Myers and Dream-Works
+would work together to form a "unique filmmaking pact." Under the
+agreement, DreamWorks "will acquire the rights to existing motion
+picture hits and classics, write new storylines and&mdash;with the use
+of stateof-the-art digital technology&mdash;insert Myers and other
+actors into the film, thereby creating an entirely new piece of
+entertainment."
+</para>
+<para>
+The announcement called this "film sampling." As Myers explained,
+"Film Sampling is an exciting way to put an original spin on existing
+films and allow audiences to see old movies in a new light. Rap

 artists have been doing this for years with music and now we are able
 to take that same concept and apply it to film." Steven Spielberg is
 artists have been doing this for years with music and now we are able
 to take that same concept and apply it to film." Steven Spielberg is

-quoted as saying, "If anyone can create a way to bring old films to new
-audiences, it is Mike."
+quoted as saying, "If anyone can create a way to bring old films to
+new audiences, it is Mike."

 </para>
 <para>
 Spielberg is right. Film sampling by Myers will be brilliant. But if
 you don't think about it, you might miss the truly astonishing point
 </para>
 <para>
 Spielberg is right. Film sampling by Myers will be brilliant. But if
 you don't think about it, you might miss the truly astonishing point

-about this announcement. As the vast majority of our film heritage 
-               remains
-under copyright, the real meaning of the DreamWorks 
-               announcement
-is just this: It is Mike Myers and only Mike Myers who is
+about this announcement. As the vast majority of our film heritage
+remains under copyright, the real meaning of the DreamWorks
+announcement is just this: It is Mike Myers and only Mike Myers who is

 free to sample. Any general freedom to build upon the film archive of
 our culture, a freedom in other contexts presumed for us all, is now a
 privilege reserved for the funny and famous&mdash;and presumably rich.
 free to sample. Any general freedom to build upon the film archive of
 our culture, a freedom in other contexts presumed for us all, is now a
 privilege reserved for the funny and famous&mdash;and presumably rich.


@@ -5600,7 +5568,7 @@ alone, there were more than 5,475 films deposited and "borrowed back."
 Thus, when the copyrights to films expire, there is no copy held by any
 library. The copy exists&mdash;if it exists at all&mdash;in the library archive of the
 film company.<footnote><para>
 Thus, when the copyrights to films expire, there is no copy held by any
 library. The copy exists&mdash;if it exists at all&mdash;in the library archive of the
 film company.<footnote><para>

-<!-- f2  -->
+<!-- f2 -->

 Doug Herrick, "Toward a National Film Collection: Motion Pictures at the
 Library of Congress," Film Library Quarterly 13 nos. 2&ndash;3 (1980): 5; 
                Anthony
 Doug Herrick, "Toward a National Film Collection: Motion Pictures at the
 Library of Congress," Film Library Quarterly 13 nos. 2&ndash;3 (1980): 5; 
                Anthony


@@ -6170,53 +6138,50 @@ understand the effective protection of liberty or protection of
 property at any particular moment, we must track these changes over
 time. A restriction imposed by one modality might be erased by
 another. A freedom enabled by one modality might be displaced by
 property at any particular moment, we must track these changes over
 time. A restriction imposed by one modality might be erased by
 another. A freedom enabled by one modality might be displaced by

-another.<footnote><para>
-<!-- f4  -->
-Some people object to this way of talking about "liberty." They object 
-               because
-their focus when considering the constraints that exist at any 
-               particular
-moment are constraints imposed exclusively by the government. For
-instance, if a storm destroys a bridge, these people think it is meaningless
-to say that one's liberty has been restrained. A bridge has washed out, and
-it's harder to get from one place to another. To talk about this as a loss of
-freedom, they say, is to confuse the stuff of politics with the vagaries of 
-               ordinary
-life.
-I don't mean to deny the value in this narrower view, which depends
-upon the context of the inquiry. I do, however, mean to argue against any
-insistence that this narrower view is the only proper view of liberty. As I
-argued in Code, we come from a long tradition of political thought with a
-broader focus than the narrow question of what the government did when.
-John Stuart Mill defended freedom of speech, for example, from the
-tyranny of narrow minds, not from the fear of government prosecution;
-John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Indiana: Hackett Publishing Co., 1978), 19.
-John R. Commons famously defended the economic freedom of labor
-from constraints imposed by the market; John R. Commons, "The Right
-to Work," in Malcom Rutherford and Warren J. Samuels, eds., John R.
-Commons: Selected Essays (London: Routledge: 1997), 62. The Americans
-with Disabilities Act increases the liberty of people with physical 
-               disabilities
-by changing the architecture of certain public places, thereby making
-access to those places easier; 42 United States Code, section 12101 (2000).
-Each of these interventions to change existing conditions changes the
-liberty of a particular group. The effect of those interventions should be
-accounted for in order to understand the effective liberty that each of these
-groups might face.
-</para></footnote>
+another.<footnote>
+<indexterm><primary>Commons, John R.</primary></indexterm>
+<para>
+<!-- f4 -->
+Some people object to this way of talking about "liberty." They object
+because their focus when considering the constraints that exist at any
+particular moment are constraints imposed exclusively by the
+government. For instance, if a storm destroys a bridge, these people
+think it is meaningless to say that one's liberty has been
+restrained. A bridge has washed out, and it's harder to get from one
+place to another. To talk about this as a loss of freedom, they say,
+is to confuse the stuff of politics with the vagaries of ordinary
+life.  I don't mean to deny the value in this narrower view, which
+depends upon the context of the inquiry. I do, however, mean to argue
+against any insistence that this narrower view is the only proper view
+of liberty. As I argued in Code, we come from a long tradition of
+political thought with a broader focus than the narrow question of
+what the government did when.  John Stuart Mill defended freedom of
+speech, for example, from the tyranny of narrow minds, not from the
+fear of government prosecution; John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (Indiana:
+Hackett Publishing Co., 1978), 19.  John R. Commons famously defended
+the economic freedom of labor from constraints imposed by the market;
+John R. Commons, "The Right to Work," in Malcom Rutherford and Warren
+J. Samuels, eds., John R.  Commons: Selected Essays (London:
+Routledge: 1997), 62. The Americans with Disabilities Act increases
+the liberty of people with physical disabilities by changing the
+architecture of certain public places, thereby making access to those
+places easier; 42 United States Code, section 12101 (2000).  Each of
+these interventions to change existing conditions changes the liberty
+of a particular group. The effect of those interventions should be
+accounted for in order to understand the effective liberty that each
+of these groups might face.  </para></footnote>

 </para>
 <sect2 id="hollywood">
 <title>Why Hollywood Is Right</title>
 <para>
 </para>
 <sect2 id="hollywood">
 <title>Why Hollywood Is Right</title>
 <para>

-

 The most obvious point that this model reveals is just why, or just
 how, Hollywood is right. The copyright warriors have rallied Congress
 and the courts to defend copyright. This model helps us see why that
 rallying makes sense.
 </para>
 <para>
 The most obvious point that this model reveals is just why, or just
 how, Hollywood is right. The copyright warriors have rallied Congress
 and the courts to defend copyright. This model helps us see why that
 rallying makes sense.
 </para>
 <para>

-Let's say this is the picture of copyright's regulation before the 
-               Internet:
+Let's say this is the picture of copyright's regulation before the
+Internet:

 </para>
 <figure id="fig-1371">
 <title>Copyright's regulation before the Internet.</title>
 </para>
 <figure id="fig-1371">
 <title>Copyright's regulation before the Internet.</title>


@@ -6224,35 +6189,31 @@ Let's say this is the picture of copyright's regulation before the
 </figure>
 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 136 -->
 </figure>
 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 136 -->

-There is balance between law, norms, market, and architecture. The
-law limits the ability to copy and share content, by imposing penalties
-on those who copy and share content. Those penalties are reinforced by
-technologies that make it hard to copy and share content (architecture)
-and expensive to copy and share content (market). Finally, those 
-               penalties
-are mitigated by norms we all recognize&mdash;kids, for example, taping
-other kids' records. These uses of copyrighted material may well be 
-               infringement,
-but the norms of our society (before the Internet, at least)
-had no problem with this form of infringement.
-</para>
-<para>
-Enter the Internet, or, more precisely, technologies such as MP3s
-and p2p sharing. Now the constraint of architecture changes 
-               dramatically,
+There is balance between law, norms, market, and architecture. The law
+limits the ability to copy and share content, by imposing penalties on
+those who copy and share content. Those penalties are reinforced by
+technologies that make it hard to copy and share content
+(architecture) and expensive to copy and share content
+(market). Finally, those penalties are mitigated by norms we all
+recognize&mdash;kids, for example, taping other kids' records. These
+uses of copyrighted material may well be infringement, but the norms
+of our society (before the Internet, at least) had no problem with
+this form of infringement.
+</para>
+<para>
+Enter the Internet, or, more precisely, technologies such as MP3s and
+p2p sharing. Now the constraint of architecture changes dramatically,

 as does the constraint of the market. And as both the market and
 architecture relax the regulation of copyright, norms pile on. The
 as does the constraint of the market. And as both the market and
 architecture relax the regulation of copyright, norms pile on. The

-happy balance (for the warriors, at least) of life before the Internet 
-               becomes
-an effective state of anarchy after the Internet.
+happy balance (for the warriors, at least) of life before the Internet
+becomes an effective state of anarchy after the Internet.

 </para>
 <para>
 </para>
 <para>

-Thus the sense of, and justification for, the warriors' response. 
-               Technology
-has changed, the warriors say, and the effect of this change,
-when ramified through the market and norms, is that a balance of 
-               protection
-for the copyright owners' rights has been lost. This is Iraq
+Thus the sense of, and justification for, the warriors' response.
+Technology has changed, the warriors say, and the effect of this
+change, when ramified through the market and norms, is that a balance
+of protection for the copyright owners' rights has been lost. This is
+Iraq

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 137 -->
 after the fall of Saddam, but this time no government is justifying the
 looting that results.
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 137 -->
 after the fall of Saddam, but this time no government is justifying the
 looting that results.


@@ -6263,84 +6224,70 @@ looting that results.
 </figure>
 <para>
 Neither this analysis nor the conclusions that follow are new to the
 </figure>
 <para>
 Neither this analysis nor the conclusions that follow are new to the

-warriors. Indeed, in a "White Paper" prepared by the Commerce 
-               Department
-(one heavily influenced by the copyright warriors) in 1995,
+warriors. Indeed, in a "White Paper" prepared by the Commerce
+Department (one heavily influenced by the copyright warriors) in 1995,

 this mix of regulatory modalities had already been identified and the
 this mix of regulatory modalities had already been identified and the

-strategy to respond already mapped. In response to the changes the 
-               Internet
-had effected, the White Paper argued (1) Congress should
-strengthen intellectual property law, (2) businesses should adopt 
-               innovative
-marketing techniques, (3) technologists should push to develop
-code to protect copyrighted material, and (4) educators should educate
-kids to better protect copyright.
-</para>
-<para>
-This mixed strategy is just what copyright needed&mdash;if it was to 
-               preserve
-the particular balance that existed before the change induced by
-the Internet. And it's just what we should expect the content industry
-to push for. It is as American as apple pie to consider the happy life
-you have as an entitlement, and to look to the law to protect it if 
-               something
-comes along to change that happy life. Homeowners living in a
+strategy to respond already mapped. In response to the changes the
+Internet had effected, the White Paper argued (1) Congress should
+strengthen intellectual property law, (2) businesses should adopt
+innovative marketing techniques, (3) technologists should push to
+develop code to protect copyrighted material, and (4) educators should
+educate kids to better protect copyright.
+</para>
+<para>
+This mixed strategy is just what copyright needed&mdash;if it was to
+preserve the particular balance that existed before the change induced
+by the Internet. And it's just what we should expect the content
+industry to push for. It is as American as apple pie to consider the
+happy life you have as an entitlement, and to look to the law to
+protect it if something comes along to change that happy
+life. Homeowners living in a

 
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 138 -->
 flood plain have no hesitation appealing to the government to rebuild
 
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 138 -->
 flood plain have no hesitation appealing to the government to rebuild

-(and rebuild again) when a flood (architecture) wipes away their 
-               property
-(law). Farmers have no hesitation appealing to the government to
-bail them out when a virus (architecture) devastates their crop. Unions
-have no hesitation appealing to the government to bail them out when
-imports (market) wipe out the U.S. steel industry.
+(and rebuild again) when a flood (architecture) wipes away their
+property (law). Farmers have no hesitation appealing to the government
+to bail them out when a virus (architecture) devastates their
+crop. Unions have no hesitation appealing to the government to bail
+them out when imports (market) wipe out the U.S. steel industry.

 </para>
 <para>
 Thus, there's nothing wrong or surprising in the content industry's
 </para>
 <para>
 Thus, there's nothing wrong or surprising in the content industry's

-campaign to protect itself from the harmful consequences of a 
-               technological
-innovation. And I would be the last person to argue that the
-changing technology of the Internet has not had a profound effect on the
-content industry's way of doing business, or as John Seely Brown 
-               describes
-it, its "architecture of revenue."
+campaign to protect itself from the harmful consequences of a
+technological innovation. And I would be the last person to argue that
+the changing technology of the Internet has not had a profound effect
+on the content industry's way of doing business, or as John Seely
+Brown describes it, its "architecture of revenue."

 </para>
 <para>
 </para>
 <para>

-But just because a particular interest asks for government support,
-it doesn't follow that support should be granted. And just because 
-               technology
-has weakened a particular way of doing business, it doesn't 
-               follow
-that the government should intervene to support that old way of
+But just because a particular interest asks for government support, it
+doesn't follow that support should be granted. And just because
+technology has weakened a particular way of doing business, it doesn't
+follow that the government should intervene to support that old way of

 doing business. Kodak, for example, has lost perhaps as much as 20
 percent of their traditional film market to the emerging technologies
 of digital cameras.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f5 -->
 doing business. Kodak, for example, has lost perhaps as much as 20
 percent of their traditional film market to the emerging technologies
 of digital cameras.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f5 -->

-See Geoffrey Smith, "Film vs. Digital: Can Kodak Build a Bridge?" 
-               BusinessWeek
-online, 2 August 1999, available at 
-<ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #23</ulink>. For a more recent
-analysis of Kodak's place in the market, see Chana R. Schoenberger, "Can
-Kodak Make Up for Lost Moments?" Forbes.com, 6 October 2003, 
-               available
-at 
+See Geoffrey Smith, "Film vs. Digital: Can Kodak Build a Bridge?"
+BusinessWeek online, 2 August 1999, available at
+<ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #23</ulink>. For a more
+recent analysis of Kodak's place in the market, see Chana
+R. Schoenberger, "Can Kodak Make Up for Lost Moments?" Forbes.com, 6
+October 2003, available at

 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #24</ulink>.
 </para></footnote>
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #24</ulink>.
 </para></footnote>

-Does anyone believe the government should ban
-digital cameras just to support Kodak? Highways have weakened the
-freight business for railroads. Does anyone think we should ban trucks
-from roads for the purpose of protecting the railroads? Closer to the 
-               subject
-of this book, remote channel changers have weakened the 
-               "stickiness"
-of television advertising (if a boring commercial comes on the
-TV, the remote makes it easy to surf ), and it may well be that this
-change has weakened the television advertising market. But does 
-               anyone
-believe we should regulate remotes to reinforce commercial 
-               television?
-(Maybe by limiting them to function only once a second, or to
-switch to only ten channels within an hour?)
+
+Does anyone believe the government should ban digital cameras just to
+support Kodak? Highways have weakened the freight business for
+railroads. Does anyone think we should ban trucks from roads for the
+purpose of protecting the railroads? Closer to the subject of this
+book, remote channel changers have weakened the "stickiness" of
+television advertising (if a boring commercial comes on the TV, the
+remote makes it easy to surf ), and it may well be that this change
+has weakened the television advertising market. But does anyone
+believe we should regulate remotes to reinforce commercial television?
+(Maybe by limiting them to function only once a second, or to switch
+to only ten channels within an hour?)

 </para>
 <para>
 The obvious answer to these obviously rhetorical questions is no.
 </para>
 <para>
 The obvious answer to these obviously rhetorical questions is no.


@@ -6365,42 +6312,36 @@ Brezhnev.
 </para>
 <para>
 Thus, while it is understandable for industries threatened with new
 </para>
 <para>
 Thus, while it is understandable for industries threatened with new

-technologies that change the way they do business to look to the 
-               government
-for protection, it is the special duty of policy makers to 
-               guarantee
-that that protection not become a deterrent to progress. It is the
-duty of policy makers, in other words, to assure that the changes they
-create, in response to the request of those hurt by changing technology,
-are changes that preserve the incentives and opportunities for 
-               innovation
-and change.
-</para>
-<para>
-In the context of laws regulating speech&mdash;which include, obviously,
-copyright law&mdash;that duty is even stronger. When the industry 
-               complaining
-about changing technologies is asking Congress to respond in
-a way that burdens speech and creativity, policy makers should be 
-               especially
-wary of the request. It is always a bad deal for the government
-to get into the business of regulating speech markets. The risks and
-dangers of that game are precisely why our framers created the First
-Amendment to our Constitution: "Congress shall make no law . . .
-abridging the freedom of speech." So when Congress is being asked to
-pass laws that would "abridge" the freedom of speech, it should ask&mdash;
-carefully&mdash;whether such regulation is justified.
+technologies that change the way they do business to look to the
+government for protection, it is the special duty of policy makers to
+guarantee that that protection not become a deterrent to progress. It
+is the duty of policy makers, in other words, to assure that the
+changes they create, in response to the request of those hurt by
+changing technology, are changes that preserve the incentives and
+opportunities for innovation and change.
+</para>
+<para>
+In the context of laws regulating speech&mdash;which include,
+obviously, copyright law&mdash;that duty is even stronger. When the
+industry complaining about changing technologies is asking Congress to
+respond in a way that burdens speech and creativity, policy makers
+should be especially wary of the request. It is always a bad deal for
+the government to get into the business of regulating speech
+markets. The risks and dangers of that game are precisely why our
+framers created the First Amendment to our Constitution: "Congress
+shall make no law . . .  abridging the freedom of speech." So when
+Congress is being asked to pass laws that would "abridge" the freedom
+of speech, it should ask&mdash; carefully&mdash;whether such
+regulation is justified.

 </para>
 <para>
 My argument just now, however, has nothing to do with whether
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 140 -->
 the changes that are being pushed by the copyright warriors are
 </para>
 <para>
 My argument just now, however, has nothing to do with whether
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 140 -->
 the changes that are being pushed by the copyright warriors are

-       "justified."
-My argument is about their effect. For before we get to the 
-               question
-of justification, a hard question that depends a great deal upon
-your values, we should first ask whether we understand the effect of the
-changes the content industry wants.
+"justified."  My argument is about their effect. For before we get to
+the question of justification, a hard question that depends a great
+deal upon your values, we should first ask whether we understand the
+effect of the changes the content industry wants.

 </para>
 <para>
 Here's the metaphor that will capture the argument to follow.
 </para>
 <para>
 Here's the metaphor that will capture the argument to follow.


@@ -6418,46 +6359,40 @@ production is a good thing. No one doubts that the work of M
 important and valuable and probably saved lives, possibly millions.
 </para>
 <para>
 important and valuable and probably saved lives, possibly millions.
 </para>
 <para>

-But in 1962, Rachel Carson published Silent Spring, which argued
-that DDT, whatever its primary benefits, was also having unintended
-environmental consequences. Birds were losing the ability to 
-               reproduce.
-Whole chains of the ecology were being destroyed.
+But in 1962, Rachel Carson published Silent Spring, which argued that
+DDT, whatever its primary benefits, was also having unintended
+environmental consequences. Birds were losing the ability to
+reproduce.  Whole chains of the ecology were being destroyed.

 </para>
 <para>
 </para>
 <para>

-No one set out to destroy the environment. Paul Müller certainly
-did not aim to harm any birds. But the effort to solve one set of 
-               problems
-produced another set which, in the view of some, was far worse
-than the problems that were originally attacked. Or more accurately,
-the problems DDT caused were worse than the problems it solved, at
-least when considering the other, more environmentally friendly ways
-to solve the problems that DDT was meant to solve.
+No one set out to destroy the environment. Paul Müller certainly did
+not aim to harm any birds. But the effort to solve one set of problems
+produced another set which, in the view of some, was far worse than
+the problems that were originally attacked. Or more accurately, the
+problems DDT caused were worse than the problems it solved, at least
+when considering the other, more environmentally friendly ways to
+solve the problems that DDT was meant to solve.

 </para>
 <para>
 It is to this image precisely that Duke University law professor James
 Boyle appeals when he argues that we need an "environmentalism" for
 culture.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f7 -->
 </para>
 <para>
 It is to this image precisely that Duke University law professor James
 Boyle appeals when he argues that we need an "environmentalism" for
 culture.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f7 -->

-See, for example, James Boyle, "A Politics of Intellectual Property: 
-               Environmentalism
-for the Net?" Duke Law Journal 47 (1997): 87.
-</para></footnote>
-His point, and the point I want to develop in the balance of
-this chapter, is not that the aims of copyright are flawed. Or that 
-               authors
-should not be paid for their work. Or that music should be given
-away "for free." The point is that some of the ways in which we might
-protect authors will have unintended consequences for the cultural 
-               environment,
-much like DDT had for the natural environment. And just
+See, for example, James Boyle, "A Politics of Intellectual Property:
+Environmentalism for the Net?" Duke Law Journal 47 (1997): 87.
+</para></footnote>
+His point, and the point I want to develop in the balance of this
+chapter, is not that the aims of copyright are flawed. Or that authors
+should not be paid for their work. Or that music should be given away
+"for free." The point is that some of the ways in which we might
+protect authors will have unintended consequences for the cultural
+environment, much like DDT had for the natural environment. And just

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 141 -->
 as criticism of DDT is not an endorsement of malaria or an attack on
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 141 -->
 as criticism of DDT is not an endorsement of malaria or an attack on

-farmers, so, too, is criticism of one particular set of regulations 
-               protecting
-copyright not an endorsement of anarchy or an attack on authors.
-It is an environment of creativity that we seek, and we should be aware
-of our actions' effects on the environment.
+farmers, so, too, is criticism of one particular set of regulations
+protecting copyright not an endorsement of anarchy or an attack on
+authors.  It is an environment of creativity that we seek, and we
+should be aware of our actions' effects on the environment.

 </para>
 <para>
 My argument, in the balance of this chapter, tries to map exactly
 </para>
 <para>
 My argument, in the balance of this chapter, tries to map exactly


@@ -6479,18 +6414,15 @@ be lost.
 <sect2 id="beginnings">
 <title>Beginnings</title>
 <para>
 <sect2 id="beginnings">
 <title>Beginnings</title>
 <para>

-America copied English copyright law. Actually, we copied and 
-               improved
-English copyright law. Our Constitution makes the purpose of
-"creative property" rights clear; its express limitations reinforce the 
-               English
+America copied English copyright law. Actually, we copied and improved
+English copyright law. Our Constitution makes the purpose of "creative
+property" rights clear; its express limitations reinforce the English

 aim to avoid overly powerful publishers.
 </para>
 <para>
 aim to avoid overly powerful publishers.
 </para>
 <para>

-The power to establish "creative property" rights is granted to 
-               Congress
-in a way that, for our Constitution, at least, is very odd. Article I,
-section 8, clause 8 of our Constitution states that:
+The power to establish "creative property" rights is granted to
+Congress in a way that, for our Constitution, at least, is very
+odd. Article I, section 8, clause 8 of our Constitution states that:

 </para>
 <para>
 Congress has the power to promote the Progress of Science and
 </para>
 <para>
 Congress has the power to promote the Progress of Science and


@@ -6498,48 +6430,43 @@ useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors
 the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
 
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 142 -->
 the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
 
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 142 -->

-We can call this the "Progress Clause," for notice what this clause does
-not say. It does not say Congress has the power to grant "creative 
-               property
-rights." It says that Congress has the power to promote progress. The
-grant of power is its purpose, and its purpose is a public one, not the
-purpose of enriching publishers, nor even primarily the purpose of 
-               rewarding
-authors.
+We can call this the "Progress Clause," for notice what this clause
+does not say. It does not say Congress has the power to grant
+"creative property rights." It says that Congress has the power to
+promote progress. The grant of power is its purpose, and its purpose
+is a public one, not the purpose of enriching publishers, nor even
+primarily the purpose of rewarding authors.

 </para>
 <para>
 </para>
 <para>

-The Progress Clause expressly limits the term of copyrights. As we
-saw in chapter 6, the English limited the term of copyright so as to 
-               assure
-that a few would not exercise disproportionate control over culture
-by exercising disproportionate control over publishing. We can assume
-the framers followed the English for a similar purpose. Indeed, unlike
-the English, the framers reinforced that objective, by requiring that
-copyrights extend "to Authors" only.
+The Progress Clause expressly limits the term of copyrights. As we saw
+in chapter 6, the English limited the term of copyright so as to
+assure that a few would not exercise disproportionate control over
+culture by exercising disproportionate control over publishing. We can
+assume the framers followed the English for a similar purpose. Indeed,
+unlike the English, the framers reinforced that objective, by
+requiring that copyrights extend "to Authors" only.

 </para>
 <para>
 The design of the Progress Clause reflects something about the
 </para>
 <para>
 The design of the Progress Clause reflects something about the

-Constitution's design in general. To avoid a problem, the framers built
-structure. To prevent the concentrated power of publishers, they built
-a structure that kept copyrights away from publishers and kept them
-short. To prevent the concentrated power of a church, they banned the
-federal government from establishing a church. To prevent 
-               concentrating
-power in the federal government, they built structures to reinforce
-the power of the states&mdash;including the Senate, whose members were
-at the time selected by the states, and an electoral college, also selected
-by the states, to select the president. In each case, a structure built
-checks and balances into the constitutional frame, structured to 
-               prevent
-otherwise inevitable concentrations of power.
-</para>
-<para>
-I doubt the framers would recognize the regulation we call 
-               "copyright"
-today. The scope of that regulation is far beyond anything they
-ever considered. To begin to understand what they did, we need to put
-our "copyright" in context: We need to see how it has changed in the
-210 years since they first struck its design.
+Constitution's design in general. To avoid a problem, the framers
+built structure. To prevent the concentrated power of publishers, they
+built a structure that kept copyrights away from publishers and kept
+them short. To prevent the concentrated power of a church, they banned
+the federal government from establishing a church. To prevent
+concentrating power in the federal government, they built structures
+to reinforce the power of the states&mdash;including the Senate, whose
+members were at the time selected by the states, and an electoral
+college, also selected by the states, to select the president. In each
+case, a structure built checks and balances into the constitutional
+frame, structured to prevent otherwise inevitable concentrations of
+power.
+</para>
+<para>
+I doubt the framers would recognize the regulation we call "copyright"
+today. The scope of that regulation is far beyond anything they ever
+considered. To begin to understand what they did, we need to put our
+"copyright" in context: We need to see how it has changed in the 210
+years since they first struck its design.

 </para>
 <para>
 Some of these changes come from the law: some in light of changes
 </para>
 <para>
 Some of these changes come from the law: some in light of changes


@@ -6614,7 +6541,7 @@ in the United States both before 1790 and from 1790 through 1800, 95
 percent immediately passed into the public domain; the balance would
 pass into the pubic domain within twenty-eight years at most, and more
 likely within fourteen years.<footnote><para>
 percent immediately passed into the public domain; the balance would
 pass into the pubic domain within twenty-eight years at most, and more
 likely within fourteen years.<footnote><para>

-<!-- f9  -->
+<!-- f9 -->

 Although 13,000 titles were published in the United States from 1790
 to 1799, only 556 copyright registrations were filed; John Tebbel, A
 History of Book Publishing in the United States, vol. 1, The Creation
 Although 13,000 titles were published in the United States from 1790
 to 1799, only 556 copyright registrations were filed; John Tebbel, A
 History of Book Publishing in the United States, vol. 1, The Creation


@@ -7923,6 +7850,7 @@ of the media.
 These changes are of two sorts: the scope of concentration, and its
 nature.
 </para>
 These changes are of two sorts: the scope of concentration, and its
 nature.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>BMG</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 Changes in scope are the easier ones to describe. As Senator John
 McCain summarized the data produced in the FCC's review of media
 <para>
 Changes in scope are the easier ones to describe. As Senator John
 McCain summarized the data produced in the FCC's review of media


@@ -7930,8 +7858,8 @@ ownership, "five companies control 85 percent of our media sources."<footnote><p
 <!-- f25 -->
 FCC Oversight: Hearing Before the Senate Commerce, Science and
 Transportation Committee, 108th Cong., 1st sess. (22 May 2003)
 <!-- f25 -->
 FCC Oversight: Hearing Before the Senate Commerce, Science and
 Transportation Committee, 108th Cong., 1st sess. (22 May 2003)

-(statement of Senator John McCain).  </para></footnote> The five
-recording labels of Universal Music Group, BMG, Sony Music
+(statement of Senator John McCain).  </para></footnote>
+The five recording labels of Universal Music Group, BMG, Sony Music

 Entertainment, Warner Music Group, and EMI control 84.8 percent of the
 U.S. music market.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f26 -->
 Entertainment, Warner Music Group, and EMI control 84.8 percent of the
 U.S. music market.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f26 -->


@@ -9181,6 +9109,7 @@ perspectives are constantly attuned to the ways in which regulation
 simply enables the powerful industries of today to protect themselves
 against the competitors of tomorrow.
 </para>
 simply enables the powerful industries of today to protect themselves
 against the competitors of tomorrow.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Barry, Hank</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 This is the single most dramatic effect of the shift in regulatory
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 198 -->
 <para>
 This is the single most dramatic effect of the shift in regulatory
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 198 -->


@@ -9280,6 +9209,8 @@ industry directs its guns against them. It is also you. So those of
 you who believe the law should be less restrictive should realize that
 such a view of the law will cost you and your firm dearly.
 </para>
 you who believe the law should be less restrictive should realize that
 such a view of the law will cost you and your firm dearly.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Hummer, John</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Barry, Hank</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 This strategy is not just limited to the lawyers. In April 2003,
 Universal and EMI brought a lawsuit against Hummer Winblad, the
 <para>
 This strategy is not just limited to the lawyers. In April 2003,
 Universal and EMI brought a lawsuit against Hummer Winblad, the


@@ -9310,31 +9241,32 @@ are afraid of technologies that touch content. In an article in Business
 2.0, Rafe Needleman describes a discussion with BMW:
 </para>
 <blockquote>
 2.0, Rafe Needleman describes a discussion with BMW:
 </para>
 <blockquote>

+<indexterm><primary>BMW</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 I asked why, with all the storage capacity and computer power in
 the car, there was no way to play MP3 files. I was told that BMW
 engineers in Germany had rigged a new vehicle to play MP3s via
 the car's built-in sound system, but that the company's marketing
 and legal departments weren't comfortable with pushing this 
 <para>
 I asked why, with all the storage capacity and computer power in
 the car, there was no way to play MP3 files. I was told that BMW
 engineers in Germany had rigged a new vehicle to play MP3s via
 the car's built-in sound system, but that the company's marketing
 and legal departments weren't comfortable with pushing this 

-               forward
-for release stateside. Even today, no new cars are sold in the
-United States with bona fide MP3 players. . . . <footnote><para>
-<!-- f5. --> Rafe Needleman, "Driving in Cars with MP3s," Business 2.0, 16 June
+forward for release stateside. Even today, no new cars are sold in the
+United States with bona fide MP3 players. . . . <footnote>
+<indexterm><primary>Needleman, Rafe</primary></indexterm>
+<para>
+<!-- f5. -->
+Rafe Needleman, "Driving in Cars with MP3s," Business 2.0, 16 June

 2003, available at 
 2003, available at 

-<ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #43</ulink>. I am grateful to Dr. Mohammad Al-Ubaydli
-for this example.
+<ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #43</ulink>. I am grateful
+to Dr. Mohammad Al-Ubaydli for this example.

 </para></footnote>
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>
 This is the world of the mafia&mdash;filled with "your money or your
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
 </blockquote>
 <para>
 This is the world of the mafia&mdash;filled with "your money or your

-life" offers, governed in the end not by courts but by the threats that the
-law empowers copyright holders to exercise. It is a system that will 
-               obviously
-and necessarily stifle new innovation. It is hard enough to start
-a company. It is impossibly hard if that company is constantly 
-               threatened
-by litigation.
+life" offers, governed in the end not by courts but by the threats
+that the law empowers copyright holders to exercise. It is a system
+that will obviously and necessarily stifle new innovation. It is hard
+enough to start a company. It is impossibly hard if that company is
+constantly threatened by litigation.

 </para>
 <para>
 
 </para>
 <para>
 


@@ -9773,9 +9705,9 @@ Why? What justifies this difference? Was there any study of the
 economic consequences from Internet radio that would justify these
 differences? Was the motive to protect artists against piracy?
 </para>
 economic consequences from Internet radio that would justify these
 differences? Was the motive to protect artists against piracy?
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 <para>

-In a rare bit of candor, one RIAA expert admitted what seemed 
-               obvious
+In a rare bit of candor, one RIAA expert admitted what seemed obvious

 to everyone at the time. As Alex Alben, vice president for Public
 Policy at Real Networks, told me,
 </para>
 to everyone at the time. As Alex Alben, vice president for Public
 Policy at Real Networks, told me,
 </para>


@@ -11999,86 +11931,74 @@ between Democrats and Republicans on this issue. Anyone can recognize
 the stupid harm of the present system.
 </para>
 <para>
 the stupid harm of the present system.
 </para>
 <para>

-Indeed, many recognized the obvious benefit of the registration 
-               requirement.
-For one of the hardest things about the current system for
-people who want to license content is that there is no obvious place to
-look for the current copyright owners. Since registration is not 
-               required,
-since marking content is not required, since no formality at all
-is required, it is often impossibly hard to locate copyright owners to ask
-permission to use or license their work. This system would lower these
-costs, by establishing at least one registry where copyright owners
-could be identified.
+Indeed, many recognized the obvious benefit of the registration
+requirement.  For one of the hardest things about the current system
+for people who want to license content is that there is no obvious
+place to look for the current copyright owners. Since registration is
+not required, since marking content is not required, since no
+formality at all is required, it is often impossibly hard to locate
+copyright owners to ask permission to use or license their work. This
+system would lower these costs, by establishing at least one registry
+where copyright owners could be identified.

 </para>
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Berlin Act (1908)</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Berne Convention (1908)</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 257 -->
 As I described in chapter 10, formalities in copyright law were
 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 257 -->
 As I described in chapter 10, formalities in copyright law were

-       removed
-in 1976, when Congress followed the Europeans by 
-               abandoning
+removed in 1976, when Congress followed the Europeans by abandoning

 any formal requirement before a copyright is granted.<footnote><para>
 any formal requirement before a copyright is granted.<footnote><para>

-<!-- f1. --> Until the 1908 Berlin Act of the Berne Convention, national copyright
-legislation sometimes made protection depend upon compliance with 
-               formalities
-such as registration, deposit, and affixation of notice of the 
-               author's
-claim of copyright. However, starting with the 1908 act, every text
-of the Convention has provided that "the enjoyment and the exercise" of
-rights guaranteed by the Convention "shall not be subject to any 
-               formality."
-The prohibition against formalities is presently embodied in Article
-5(2) of the Paris Text of the Berne Convention. Many countries continue
-to impose some form of deposit or registration requirement, albeit not as
-a condition of copyright. French law, for example, requires the deposit of
-copies of works in national repositories, principally the National Museum.
+<!-- f1. -->
+Until the 1908 Berlin Act of the Berne Convention, national copyright
+legislation sometimes made protection depend upon compliance with
+formalities such as registration, deposit, and affixation of notice of
+the author's claim of copyright. However, starting with the 1908 act,
+every text of the Convention has provided that "the enjoyment and the
+exercise" of rights guaranteed by the Convention "shall not be subject
+to any formality."  The prohibition against formalities is presently
+embodied in Article 5(2) of the Paris Text of the Berne
+Convention. Many countries continue to impose some form of deposit or
+registration requirement, albeit not as a condition of
+copyright. French law, for example, requires the deposit of copies of
+works in national repositories, principally the National Museum.

 Copies of books published in the United Kingdom must be deposited in
 the British Library. The German Copyright Act provides for a Registrar
 Copies of books published in the United Kingdom must be deposited in
 the British Library. The German Copyright Act provides for a Registrar

-of Authors where the author's true name can be filed in the case of 
-               anonymous
-or pseudonymous works. Paul Goldstein, International Intellectual
-Property Law, Cases and Materials (New York: Foundation Press, 2001),
-153&ndash;54.
-</para></footnote>
- The 
-               Europeans
-are said to view copyright as a "natural right." Natural rights
-don't need forms to exist. Traditions, like the Anglo-American 
-               tradition
-that required copyright owners to follow form if their rights were
-to be protected, did not, the Europeans thought, properly respect the
-dignity of the author. My right as a creator turns on my creativity, not
-upon the special favor of the government.
-</para>
-<para>
-That's great rhetoric. It sounds wonderfully romantic. But it is 
-               absurd
-copyright policy. It is absurd especially for authors, because a
-world without formalities harms the creator. The ability to spread
+of Authors where the author's true name can be filed in the case of
+anonymous or pseudonymous works. Paul Goldstein, International
+Intellectual Property Law, Cases and Materials (New York: Foundation
+Press, 2001), 153&ndash;54.  </para></footnote>
+The Europeans are said to view copyright as a "natural right." Natural
+rights don't need forms to exist. Traditions, like the Anglo-American
+tradition that required copyright owners to follow form if their
+rights were to be protected, did not, the Europeans thought, properly
+respect the dignity of the author. My right as a creator turns on my
+creativity, not upon the special favor of the government.
+</para>
+<para>
+That's great rhetoric. It sounds wonderfully romantic. But it is
+absurd copyright policy. It is absurd especially for authors, because
+a world without formalities harms the creator. The ability to spread

 "Walt Disney creativity" is destroyed when there is no simple way to
 know what's protected and what's not.
 </para>
 "Walt Disney creativity" is destroyed when there is no simple way to
 know what's protected and what's not.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>Berne Convention (1908)</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 <para>

-The fight against formalities achieved its first real victory in Berlin
-in 1908. International copyright lawyers amended the Berne 
-               Convention
-in 1908, to require copyright terms of life plus fifty years, as well as
-the abolition of copyright formalities. The formalities were hated 
-               because
-the stories of inadvertent loss were increasingly common. It was
-as if a Charles Dickens character ran all copyright offices, and the 
-               failure
-to dot an i or cross a t resulted in the loss of widows' only income.
+The fight against formalities achieved its first real victory in
+Berlin in 1908. International copyright lawyers amended the Berne
+Convention in 1908, to require copyright terms of life plus fifty
+years, as well as the abolition of copyright formalities. The
+formalities were hated because the stories of inadvertent loss were
+increasingly common. It was as if a Charles Dickens character ran all
+copyright offices, and the failure to dot an i or cross a t resulted
+in the loss of widows' only income.

 </para>
 <para>
 These complaints were real and sensible. And the strictness of the
 </para>
 <para>
 These complaints were real and sensible. And the strictness of the

-formalities, especially in the United States, was absurd. The law should
-always have ways of forgiving innocent mistakes. There is no reason
-copyright law couldn't, as well. Rather than abandoning formalities 
-               totally,
-the response in Berlin should have been to embrace a more 
-               equitable
-system of registration.
+formalities, especially in the United States, was absurd. The law
+should always have ways of forgiving innocent mistakes. There is no
+reason copyright law couldn't, as well. Rather than abandoning
+formalities totally, the response in Berlin should have been to
+embrace a more equitable system of registration.

 </para>
 <para>
 Even that would have been resisted, however, because registration
 </para>
 <para>
 Even that would have been resisted, however, because registration


@@ -12937,6 +12857,7 @@ something more than the handmaiden of the most powerful interests.
 It might be crazy to argue that we should preserve a tradition that has
 been part of our tradition for most of our history&mdash;free culture.
 </para>
 It might be crazy to argue that we should preserve a tradition that has
 been part of our tradition for most of our history&mdash;free culture.
 </para>

+<indexterm><primary>CodePink Women in Peace</primary></indexterm>

 <para>
 If this is crazy, then let there be more crazies. Soon.  There are
 moments of hope in this struggle. And moments that surprise. When the
 <para>
 If this is crazy, then let there be more crazies. Soon.  There are
 moments of hope in this struggle. And moments that surprise. When the


@@ -13397,37 +13318,32 @@ The same strategy could be applied to culture, as a response to the
 control effected through law and technology.
 </para>
 <para>
 control effected through law and technology.
 </para>
 <para>

-Enter the Creative Commons. The Creative Commons is a 
-               nonprofit
+Enter the Creative Commons. The Creative Commons is a nonprofit

 corporation established in Massachusetts, but with its home at
 corporation established in Massachusetts, but with its home at

-Stanford University. Its aim is to build a layer of reasonable copyright
-on top of the extremes that now reign. It does this by making it easy for
-people to build upon other people's work, by making it simple for 
-               creators
-to express the freedom for others to take and build upon their
-work. Simple tags, tied to human-readable descriptions, tied to 
-               bulletproof
-licenses, make this possible.
-</para>
-<para>
-Simple&mdash;which means without a middleman, or without a lawyer.
-By developing a free set of licenses that people can attach to their
-content, Creative Commons aims to mark a range of content that
-can easily, and reliably, be built upon. These tags are then linked to
-machine-readable versions of the license that enable computers 
-               automatically
-to identify content that can easily be shared. These three 
-               expressions
-together&mdash;a legal license, a human-readable description, and
+Stanford University. Its aim is to build a layer of reasonable
+copyright on top of the extremes that now reign. It does this by
+making it easy for people to build upon other people's work, by making
+it simple for creators to express the freedom for others to take and
+build upon their work. Simple tags, tied to human-readable
+descriptions, tied to bulletproof licenses, make this possible.
+</para>
+<para>
+Simple&mdash;which means without a middleman, or without a lawyer.  By
+developing a free set of licenses that people can attach to their
+content, Creative Commons aims to mark a range of content that can
+easily, and reliably, be built upon. These tags are then linked to
+machine-readable versions of the license that enable computers
+automatically to identify content that can easily be shared. These
+three expressions together&mdash;a legal license, a human-readable
+description, and

 <!-- PAGE BREAK 288 -->
 machine-readable tags&mdash;constitute a Creative Commons license. A
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 288 -->
 machine-readable tags&mdash;constitute a Creative Commons license. A

-Creative Commons license constitutes a grant of freedom to anyone
-who accesses the license, and more importantly, an expression of the
-ideal that the person associated with the license believes in something
+Creative Commons license constitutes a grant of freedom to anyone who
+accesses the license, and more importantly, an expression of the ideal
+that the person associated with the license believes in something

 different than the "All" or "No" extremes. Content is marked with the
 different than the "All" or "No" extremes. Content is marked with the

-CC mark, which does not mean that copyright is waived, but that 
-               certain
-freedoms are given.
+CC mark, which does not mean that copyright is waived, but that
+certain freedoms are given.

 </para>
 <para>
 These freedoms are beyond the freedoms promised by fair use. Their
 </para>
 <para>
 These freedoms are beyond the freedoms promised by fair use. Their


@@ -13793,28 +13709,23 @@ Copyright Office's role to that of approving standards for marking
 content that have been crafted elsewhere.
 </para>
 <para>
 content that have been crafted elsewhere.
 </para>
 <para>

-For example, if a recording industry association devises a method
-for marking CDs, it would propose that to the Copyright Office. The
+For example, if a recording industry association devises a method for
+marking CDs, it would propose that to the Copyright Office. The

 Copyright Office would hold a hearing, at which other proposals could
 be made. The Copyright Office would then select the proposal that it
 Copyright Office would hold a hearing, at which other proposals could
 be made. The Copyright Office would then select the proposal that it

-judged preferable, and it would base that choice solely upon the 
-               consideration
-of which method could best be integrated into the registration
-and renewal system. We would not count on the government to 
-               innovate;
-but we would count on the government to keep the product of 
-               innovation
-in line with its other important functions.
+judged preferable, and it would base that choice solely upon the
+consideration of which method could best be integrated into the
+registration and renewal system. We would not count on the government
+to innovate; but we would count on the government to keep the product
+of innovation in line with its other important functions.

 </para>
 <para>
 </para>
 <para>

-Finally, marking content clearly would simplify registration 
-               requirements.
-If photographs were marked by author and year, there
-would be little reason not to allow a photographer to reregister, for 
-               example,
-all photographs taken in a particular year in one quick step. The
-aim of the formality is not to burden the creator; the system itself
-should be kept as simple as possible.
+Finally, marking content clearly would simplify registration
+requirements.  If photographs were marked by author and year, there
+would be little reason not to allow a photographer to reregister, for
+example, all photographs taken in a particular year in one quick
+step. The aim of the formality is not to burden the creator; the
+system itself should be kept as simple as possible.

 </para>
 <para>
 The objective of formalities is to make things clear. The existing
 </para>
 <para>
 The objective of formalities is to make things clear. The existing


@@ -14023,75 +13934,66 @@ molasses into the machines. That's what this general requirement
 of permission does to the creative process. Smothers it.
 </para>
 <para>
 of permission does to the creative process. Smothers it.
 </para>
 <para>

-This was the point that Alben made when describing the making of
-the Clint Eastwood CD. While it makes sense to require negotiation
-for foreseeable derivative rights&mdash;turning a book into a movie, or a
-poem into a musical score&mdash;it doesn't make sense to require 
-               negotiation
-for the unforeseeable. Here, a statutory right would make much
-more sense.
+This was the point that Alben made when describing the making of the
+Clint Eastwood CD. While it makes sense to require negotiation for
+foreseeable derivative rights&mdash;turning a book into a movie, or a
+poem into a musical score&mdash;it doesn't make sense to require
+negotiation for the unforeseeable. Here, a statutory right would make
+much more sense.

 </para>
 <para>
 </para>
 <para>

-In each of these cases, the law should mark the uses that are 
-               protected,
-and the presumption should be that other uses are not 
-               protected.
-This is the reverse of the recommendation of my colleague Paul
-Goldstein.<footnote><para>
-<!-- f7. --> Paul Goldstein, Copyright's Highway: From Gutenberg to the Celestial 
-               Jukebox
-(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), 187&ndash;216.
+In each of these cases, the law should mark the uses that are
+protected, and the presumption should be that other uses are not
+protected.  This is the reverse of the recommendation of my colleague
+Paul Goldstein.<footnote>
+<indexterm><primary>Goldstein, Paul</primary></indexterm>
+<para>
+<!-- f7. -->
+Paul Goldstein, Copyright's Highway: From Gutenberg to the Celestial
+Jukebox (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003), 187&ndash;216.

 </para></footnote>
 </para></footnote>

- His view is that the law should be written so that expanded
-protections follow expanded uses.
+His view is that the law should be written so that
+expanded protections follow expanded uses.

 </para>
 <para>
 </para>
 <para>

-Goldstein's analysis would make perfect sense if the cost of the 
-               legal
+Goldstein's analysis would make perfect sense if the cost of the legal

 system were small. But as we are currently seeing in the context of
 system were small. But as we are currently seeing in the context of

-the Internet, the uncertainty about the scope of protection, and the 
-               incentives
-to protect existing architectures of revenue, combined with a
-strong copyright, weaken the process of innovation.
+the Internet, the uncertainty about the scope of protection, and the
+incentives to protect existing architectures of revenue, combined with
+a strong copyright, weaken the process of innovation.

 </para>
 <para>
 The law could remedy this problem either by removing protection
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 301 -->
 beyond the part explicitly drawn or by granting reuse rights upon
 </para>
 <para>
 The law could remedy this problem either by removing protection
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 301 -->
 beyond the part explicitly drawn or by granting reuse rights upon

-       certain
-statutory conditions. Either way, the effect would be to free a great
-deal of culture to others to cultivate. And under a statutory rights
-regime, that reuse would earn artists more income.
+certain statutory conditions. Either way, the effect would be to free
+a great deal of culture to others to cultivate. And under a statutory
+rights regime, that reuse would earn artists more income.

 </para>
 </sect2>
 
 <sect2 id="liberatemusic">
 <title>4. Liberate the Music&mdash;Again</title>
 <para>
 </para>
 </sect2>
 
 <sect2 id="liberatemusic">
 <title>4. Liberate the Music&mdash;Again</title>
 <para>

-The battle that got this whole war going was about music, so it wouldn't
-be fair to end this book without addressing the issue that is, to most
-people, most pressing&mdash;music. There is no other policy issue that 
-               better
-teaches the lessons of this book than the battles around the sharing
-of music.
+The battle that got this whole war going was about music, so it
+wouldn't be fair to end this book without addressing the issue that
+is, to most people, most pressing&mdash;music. There is no other
+policy issue that better teaches the lessons of this book than the
+battles around the sharing of music.

 </para>
 <para>
 </para>
 <para>

-The appeal of file-sharing music was the crack cocaine of the 
-               Internet's
-growth. It drove demand for access to the Internet more 
-               powerfully
-than any other single application. It was the Internet's killer
-app&mdash;possibly in two senses of that word. It no doubt was the 
-               application
-that drove demand for bandwidth. It may well be the application
-that drives demand for regulations that in the end kill innovation on
-the network.
-</para>
-<para>
-The aim of copyright, with respect to content in general and music
-in particular, is to create the incentives for music to be composed, 
-               performed,
-and, most importantly, spread. The law does this by giving
+The appeal of file-sharing music was the crack cocaine of the
+Internet's growth. It drove demand for access to the Internet more
+powerfully than any other single application. It was the Internet's
+killer app&mdash;possibly in two senses of that word. It no doubt was
+the application that drove demand for bandwidth. It may well be the
+application that drives demand for regulations that in the end kill
+innovation on the network.
+</para>
+<para>
+The aim of copyright, with respect to content in general and music in
+particular, is to create the incentives for music to be composed,
+performed, and, most importantly, spread. The law does this by giving

 an exclusive right to a composer to control public performances of his
 work, and to a performing artist to control copies of her performance.
 </para>
 an exclusive right to a composer to control public performances of his
 work, and to a performing artist to control copies of her performance.
 </para>


@@ -14115,17 +14017,15 @@ on the way to purchasing CDs.
 <listitem><para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 302 -->
 <!-- C. -->
 <listitem><para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 302 -->
 <!-- C. -->

-There are many who are using file-sharing networks to get 
-               access
-to content that is no longer sold but is still under copyright
-or that would have been too cumbersome to buy off the Net.
+There are many who are using file-sharing networks to get access to
+content that is no longer sold but is still under copyright or that
+would have been too cumbersome to buy off the Net.

 </para></listitem>
 <listitem><para>
 <!-- D. -->
 </para></listitem>
 <listitem><para>
 <!-- D. -->

-There are many who are using file-sharing networks to get 
-               access
-to content that is not copyrighted or to get access that the
-copyright owner plainly endorses.
+There are many who are using file-sharing networks to get access to
+content that is not copyrighted or to get access that the copyright
+owner plainly endorses.

 </para></listitem>
 </orderedlist>
 <para>
 </para></listitem>
 </orderedlist>
 <para>


@@ -14137,11 +14037,11 @@ effect of sharing is actually not very harmful, the need for regulation is
 significantly weakened.
 </para>
 <para>
 significantly weakened.
 </para>
 <para>

-As I said in chapter 5, the actual harm caused by sharing is 
-               controversial.
-For the purposes of this chapter, however, I assume the harm is
-real. I assume, in other words, that type A sharing is significantly
-greater than type B, and is the dominant use of sharing networks.
+As I said in chapter 5, the actual harm caused by sharing is
+controversial.  For the purposes of this chapter, however, I assume
+the harm is real. I assume, in other words, that type A sharing is
+significantly greater than type B, and is the dominant use of sharing
+networks.

 </para>
 <para>
 Nonetheless, there is a crucial fact about the current technological
 </para>
 <para>
 Nonetheless, there is a crucial fact about the current technological


@@ -14149,17 +14049,16 @@ context that we must keep in mind if we are to understand how the law
 should respond.
 </para>
 <para>
 should respond.
 </para>
 <para>

-Today, file sharing is addictive. In ten years, it won't be. It is addictive
-today because it is the easiest way to gain access to a broad range of 
-               content.
-It won't be the easiest way to get access to a broad range of content
-in ten years. Today, access to the Internet is cumbersome and slow&mdash;we
-in the United States are lucky to have broadband service at 1.5 MBs, and
-very rarely do we get service at that speed both up and down. Although
-wireless access is growing, most of us still get access across wires. Most
-only gain access through a machine with a keyboard. The idea of the 
-               always
-on, always connected Internet is mainly just an idea.
+Today, file sharing is addictive. In ten years, it won't be. It is
+addictive today because it is the easiest way to gain access to a
+broad range of content.  It won't be the easiest way to get access to
+a broad range of content in ten years. Today, access to the Internet
+is cumbersome and slow&mdash;we in the United States are lucky to have
+broadband service at 1.5 MBs, and very rarely do we get service at
+that speed both up and down. Although wireless access is growing, most
+of us still get access across wires. Most only gain access through a
+machine with a keyboard. The idea of the always on, always connected
+Internet is mainly just an idea.

 </para>
 <para>
 But it will become a reality, and that means the way we get access to
 </para>
 <para>
 But it will become a reality, and that means the way we get access to


@@ -14167,38 +14066,35 @@ the Internet today is a technology in transition. Policy makers should
 not make policy on the basis of technology in transition. They should
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 303 -->
 make policy on the basis of where the technology is going. The
 not make policy on the basis of technology in transition. They should
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 303 -->
 make policy on the basis of where the technology is going. The

-       question
-should not be, how should the law regulate sharing in this world?
-The question should be, what law will we require when the network
-becomes the network it is clearly becoming? That network is one in
-which every machine with electricity is essentially on the Net; where
-everywhere you are&mdash;except maybe the desert or the Rockies&mdash;you can
-instantaneously be connected to the Internet. Imagine the Internet as
-ubiquitous as the best cell-phone service, where with the flip of a 
-               device,
-you are connected.
-</para>
-<para>
-In that world, it will be extremely easy to connect to services that
-give you access to content on the fly&mdash;such as Internet radio, content
-that is streamed to the user when the user demands. Here, then, is the
-critical point: When it is extremely easy to connect to services that give
-access to content, it will be easier to connect to services that give you
-access to content than it will be to download and store content on the
-many devices you will have for playing content. It will be easier, in other
-words, to subscribe than it will be to be a database manager, as 
-               everyone
-in the download-sharing world of Napster-like technologies 
-               essentially
-is. Content services will compete with content sharing, even if
-the services charge money for the content they give access to. Already
-cell-phone services in Japan offer music (for a fee) streamed over cell
-phones (enhanced with plugs for headphones). The Japanese are 
-               paying
-for this content even though "free" content is available in the form
-of MP3s across the Web.<footnote><para>
-<!-- f8. --> See, for example, "Music Media Watch," The J@pan Inc. Newsletter,
-3 April 2002, available at 
+question should not be, how should the law regulate sharing in this
+world?  The question should be, what law will we require when the
+network becomes the network it is clearly becoming? That network is
+one in which every machine with electricity is essentially on the Net;
+where everywhere you are&mdash;except maybe the desert or the
+Rockies&mdash;you can instantaneously be connected to the
+Internet. Imagine the Internet as ubiquitous as the best cell-phone
+service, where with the flip of a device, you are connected.
+</para>
+<para>
+In that world, it will be extremely easy to connect to services
+that give you access to content on the fly&mdash;such as Internet
+radio, content that is streamed to the user when the user
+demands. Here, then, is the critical point: When it is extremely easy
+to connect to services that give access to content, it will be easier
+to connect to services that give you access to content than it will be
+to download and store content on the many devices you will have for
+playing content. It will be easier, in other words, to subscribe than
+it will be to be a database manager, as everyone in the
+download-sharing world of Napster-like technologies essentially
+is. Content services will compete with content sharing, even if the
+services charge money for the content they give access to. Already
+cell-phone services in Japan offer music (for a fee) streamed over
+cell phones (enhanced with plugs for headphones). The Japanese are
+paying for this content even though "free" content is available in the
+form of MP3s across the Web.<footnote><para>
+<!-- f8. -->
+See, for example, "Music Media Watch," The J@pan Inc. Newsletter, 3
+April 2002, available at

 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #76</ulink>.
 </para></footnote>
 
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #76</ulink>.
 </para></footnote>
 


@@ -14250,14 +14146,13 @@ from the author's perspective, this "sharing" of his content without
 his being compensated is less than ideal.
 </para>
 <para>
 his being compensated is less than ideal.
 </para>
 <para>

-The model of used book stores suggests that the law could simply
-deem out-of-print music fair game. If the publisher does not make
-copies of the music available for sale, then commercial and 
-               noncommercial
+The model of used book stores suggests that the law could simply deem
+out-of-print music fair game. If the publisher does not make copies of
+the music available for sale, then commercial and noncommercial

 providers would be free, under this rule, to "share" that content,
 providers would be free, under this rule, to "share" that content,

-even though the sharing involved making a copy. The copy here would
-be incidental to the trade; in a context where commercial publishing
-has ended, trading music should be as free as trading books.
+even though the sharing involved making a copy. The copy here would be
+incidental to the trade; in a context where commercial publishing has
+ended, trading music should be as free as trading books.

 </para>
 <para>
 
 </para>
 <para>
 


@@ -14314,7 +14209,10 @@ way to compensate those who are harmed.
 </para>
 <para>
 The idea would be a modification of a proposal that has been
 </para>
 <para>
 The idea would be a modification of a proposal that has been

-floated by Harvard law professor William Fisher.<footnote><para>
+floated by Harvard law professor William Fisher.<footnote>
+<indexterm><primary>Netanel, Neil Weinstock</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Fisher, William</primary></indexterm>
+<para>

 <!-- f9. --> William Fisher, Digital Music: Problems and Possibilities (last revised:
 10 October 2000), available at 
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #77</ulink>; William Fisher, Promises to Keep:
 <!-- f9. --> William Fisher, Digital Music: Problems and Possibilities (last revised:
 10 October 2000), available at 
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #77</ulink>; William Fisher, Promises to Keep:


@@ -14633,15 +14531,16 @@ keep your lawyers away.
 <chapter id="c-notes">
 <title>NOTES</title>
 <para>
 <chapter id="c-notes">
 <title>NOTES</title>
 <para>

-Throughout this text, there are references to links on the World Wide Web. As
-anyone who has tried to use the Web knows, these links can be highly unstable. I
-have tried to remedy the instability by redirecting readers to the original source
-through the Web site associated with this book. For each link below, you can go to
-http://free-culture.cc/notes and locate the original source by clicking on the
-number after the # sign. If the original link remains alive, you will be redirected to
-that link. If the original link has disappeared, you will be redirected to an 
-               appropriate
-reference for the material.
+Throughout this text, there are references to links on the World Wide
+Web. As anyone who has tried to use the Web knows, these links can be
+highly unstable. I have tried to remedy the instability by redirecting
+readers to the original source through the Web site associated with
+this book. For each link below, you can go to
+http://free-culture.cc/notes and locate the original source by
+clicking on the number after the # sign. If the original link remains
+alive, you will be redirected to that link. If the original link has
+disappeared, you will be redirected to an appropriate reference for
+the material.

 </para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 336 -->
 
 </para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 336 -->
 


@@ -14656,17 +14555,16 @@ to him that this book is dedicated.
 </para>
 <para>
 I received guidance in various places from friends and academics,
 </para>
 <para>
 I received guidance in various places from friends and academics,

-including Glenn Brown, Peter DiCola, Jennifer Mnookin, Richard
-Posner, Mark Rose, and Kathleen Sullivan. And I received correction
-and guidance from many amazing students at Stanford Law School
-and Stanford University. They included Andrew B. Coan, John Eden,
-James P. Fellers, Christopher Guzelian, Erica Goldberg, Robert 
-               Hallman,
-Andrew Harris, Matthew Kahn, Brian Link, Ohad Mayblum,
-Alina Ng, and Erica Platt. I am particularly grateful to Catherine
-Crump and Harry Surden, who helped direct their research, and to
-Laura Lynch, who brilliantly managed the army that they assembled,
-and provided her own critical eye on much of this.
+including Glenn Brown, Peter DiCola, Jennifer Mnookin, Richard Posner,
+Mark Rose, and Kathleen Sullivan. And I received correction and
+guidance from many amazing students at Stanford Law School and
+Stanford University. They included Andrew B. Coan, John Eden, James
+P. Fellers, Christopher Guzelian, Erica Goldberg, Robert Hallman,
+Andrew Harris, Matthew Kahn, Brian Link, Ohad Mayblum, Alina Ng, and
+Erica Platt. I am particularly grateful to Catherine Crump and Harry
+Surden, who helped direct their research, and to Laura Lynch, who
+brilliantly managed the army that they assembled, and provided her own
+critical eye on much of this.

 </para>
 <para>
 Yuko Noguchi helped me to understand the laws of Japan as well as
 </para>
 <para>
 Yuko Noguchi helped me to understand the laws of Japan as well as


@@ -14680,41 +14578,39 @@ chance to spend time in Japan, and to Tadashi Shiraishi and Kiyokazu
 Yamagami for their generous help while I was there.
 </para>
 <para>
 Yamagami for their generous help while I was there.
 </para>
 <para>

-These are the traditional sorts of help that academics regularly
-draw upon. But in addition to them, the Internet has made it possible
-to receive advice and correction from many whom I have never even
-met. Among those who have responded with extremely helpful advice
-to requests on my blog about the book are Dr. Mohammad Al-Ubaydli,
-David Gerstein, and Peter DiMauro, as well as a long list of those who
-had specific ideas about ways to develop my argument. They included
-Richard Bondi, Steven Cherry, David Coe, Nik Cubrilovic, Bob
-Devine, Charles Eicher, Thomas Guida, Elihu M. Gerson, Jeremy
-Hunsinger, Vaughn Iverson, John Karabaic, Jeff Keltner, James 
-               Lindenschmidt,
-K. L. Mann, Mark Manning, Nora McCauley, Jeffrey
-McHugh, Evan McMullen, Fred Norton, John Pormann, Pedro A. D.
-Rezende, Shabbir Safdar, Saul Schleimer, Clay Shirky, Adam Shostack,
-Kragen Sitaker, Chris Smith, Bruce Steinberg, Andrzej Jan Taramina,
-Sean Walsh, Matt Wasserman, Miljenko Williams, "Wink," Roger
-Wood, "Ximmbo da Jazz," and Richard Yanco. (I apologize if I have
-missed anyone; with computers come glitches, and a crash of my
-e-mail system meant I lost a bunch of great replies.)
-</para>
-<para>
-Richard Stallman and Michael Carroll each read the whole book
-in draft, and each provided extremely helpful correction and advice.
-Michael helped me to see more clearly the significance of the 
-               regulation
-of derivitive works. And Richard corrected an embarrassingly large
-number of errors. While my work is in part inspired by Stallman's, he
-does not agree with me in important places throughout this book.
-</para>
-<para>
-Finally, and forever, I am thankful to Bettina, who has always 
-               insisted
-that there would be unending happiness away from these battles,
-and who has always been right. This slow learner is, as ever, grateful for
-her perpetual patience and love.
+These are the traditional sorts of help that academics regularly draw
+upon. But in addition to them, the Internet has made it possible to
+receive advice and correction from many whom I have never even
+met. Among those who have responded with extremely helpful advice to
+requests on my blog about the book are Dr. Mohammad Al-Ubaydli, David
+Gerstein, and Peter DiMauro, as well as a long list of those who had
+specific ideas about ways to develop my argument. They included
+Richard Bondi, Steven Cherry, David Coe, Nik Cubrilovic, Bob Devine,
+Charles Eicher, Thomas Guida, Elihu M. Gerson, Jeremy Hunsinger,
+Vaughn Iverson, John Karabaic, Jeff Keltner, James Lindenschmidt,
+K. L. Mann, Mark Manning, Nora McCauley, Jeffrey McHugh, Evan
+McMullen, Fred Norton, John Pormann, Pedro A. D.  Rezende, Shabbir
+Safdar, Saul Schleimer, Clay Shirky, Adam Shostack, Kragen Sitaker,
+Chris Smith, Bruce Steinberg, Andrzej Jan Taramina, Sean Walsh, Matt
+Wasserman, Miljenko Williams, "Wink," Roger Wood, "Ximmbo da Jazz,"
+and Richard Yanco. (I apologize if I have missed anyone; with
+computers come glitches, and a crash of my e-mail system meant I lost
+a bunch of great replies.)
+</para>
+<para>
+Richard Stallman and Michael Carroll each read the whole book in
+draft, and each provided extremely helpful correction and advice.
+Michael helped me to see more clearly the significance of the
+regulation of derivitive works. And Richard corrected an
+embarrassingly large number of errors. While my work is in part
+inspired by Stallman's, he does not agree with me in important places
+throughout this book.
+</para>
+<para>
+Finally, and forever, I am thankful to Bettina, who has always
+insisted that there would be unending happiness away from these
+battles, and who has always been right. This slow learner is, as ever,
+grateful for her perpetual patience and love.

 </para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 338 -->
 
 </para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 338 -->