Wrap lines.

[text-free-culture-lessig.git] / freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 560a556abcb7a3ffaacac0a227c0ef1c1f205d9e..2e0b6a5440be07db34512c113f8a42d061d035a0 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -1285,6 +1285,9 @@ context the current battles about behavior labeled <quote>piracy.</quote>
 <indexterm id="idxanimadedcartoons" class='startofrange'>
   <primary>animated cartoons</primary>
 </indexterm>
+<indexterm id='idxcartoonfilms' class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>cartoon films</primary>
+</indexterm>
 <para>
 <emphasis role="strong">In 1928</emphasis>, a cartoon character was born. An early Mickey Mouse
 made his debut in May of that year, in a silent flop called <citetitle>Plane Crazy</citetitle>.
@@ -1483,6 +1486,7 @@ to now be free for the next Walt Disney to build upon without
 permission. Yet today, the public domain is presumptive only for
 content from before the Great Depression.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxcartoonfilms' class='endofrange'/>
 <para>
 <emphasis role="strong">Of course</emphasis>, Walt Disney had no monopoly on <quote>Walt Disney creativity.</quote>
 Nor does America. The norm of free culture has, until recently, and
@@ -4557,6 +4561,9 @@ one else could publish copies of a book to which they held the
 copyright.  Prices of the classics were thus kept high; competition to
 produce better or cheaper editions was eliminated.
 </para>
+<indexterm id='idxbritishparliament' class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>British Parliament</primary>
+</indexterm>
 <para>
 Now, there's something puzzling about the year 1774 to anyone who
 knows a little about copyright law. The better-known year in the
@@ -5017,6 +5024,7 @@ antimonopoly, resistant to the protectionist pleas of publishers. In a
 world where the Parliament is more pliant, free culture would be less
 protected.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxbritishparliament' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm startref='idxbooksenglishlaw' class='endofrange'/>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 106 -->
 </chapter>
@@ -5589,6 +5597,7 @@ curse, reserved for the few.
 <indexterm id='idxarchivesdigital1' class='startofrange'>
   <primary>archives, digital</primary>
 </indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>bots</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 <emphasis role='strong'>In April 1996</emphasis>, millions of
 <quote>bots</quote>&mdash;computer codes designed to
@@ -7306,6 +7315,7 @@ to video stores. The video stores displayed the trailers as a way to sell
 videos. Video Pipeline got the trailers from the film distributors, put
 the trailers on tape, and sold the tapes to the retail stores.
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>browsing</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 The company did this for about fifteen years. Then, in 1997, it began
 to think about the Internet as another way to distribute these
@@ -7365,6 +7375,7 @@ control. The technology expands the scope of effective control,
 because the technology builds a copy into every transaction.
 </para>
 <indexterm><primary>Barnes &amp; Noble</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>browsing</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 158 -->
 No doubt, a potential is not yet an abuse, and so the potential for
@@ -8058,6 +8069,7 @@ never be interfered with by the copyright police. You were free in
 that space to do as you wished with this part of our culture. You were
 allowed to build on it as you wished without fear of legal control.
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>bots</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 But if you moved your club onto the Internet, and made it generally
 available for others to join, the story would be very different. Bots
@@ -13443,6 +13455,9 @@ before.
 
 <section id="examples">
 <title>Rebuilding Freedoms Previously Presumed: Examples</title>
+<indexterm id='browsing' class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>browsing</primary>
+</indexterm>
 <para>
 If you step back from the battle I've been describing here, you will
 recognize this problem from other contexts. Think about
@@ -13495,6 +13510,7 @@ you. If it becomes simple to gather and sort who does what in
 electronic spaces, then the friction-induced privacy of yesterday
 disappears.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='browsing' class='endofrange'/>
 <para>
 It is this reality that explains the push of many to define <quote>privacy</quote>
 on the Internet. It is the recognition that technology can remove what