Improve translation.

[text-free-culture-lessig.git] / freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 34f3f06b75765c8099d2e793c7c455edef14a468..eae61d52e91d44c27d27b9be5cc17f2e5f32d4f5 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -10673,6 +10673,7 @@ social causes. But with the Internet, it includes a wide range of
 individuals and groups dedicated to spreading culture
 generally.<footnote><para>
 <!-- f1. -->
+<indexterm><primary>pornography</primary></indexterm>
 There's a parallel here with pornography that is a bit hard to
 describe, but it's a strong one. One phenomenon that the Internet
 created was a world of noncommercial pornographers&mdash;people who
@@ -11657,6 +11658,8 @@ who had advised us early on about a First Amendment strategy; and
 finally, former solicitor general Charles Fried.
 </para>
 <indexterm><primary>Fried, Charles</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Congress, U.S.</primary><secondary>constitutional powers of</secondary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Constitution, U.S.</primary><secondary>Commerce Clause of</secondary></indexterm>
 <para>
 Fried was a special victory for our side. Every other former solicitor
 general was hired by the other side to defend Congress's power to give
@@ -11686,6 +11689,8 @@ continue to have the right to control who did what with content they
 wanted to control.
 </para>
 <indexterm><primary>Gershwin, George</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Porgy and Bess</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>pornography</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 Dr. Seuss's representatives, for example, argued that it was
 better for the Dr. Seuss estate to control what happened to
@@ -13041,6 +13046,7 @@ perspectives.  And WIPO was an ideal venue for this discussion, since
 WIPO is the preeminent international body dealing with intellectual
 property issues.
 </para>
+<indexterm id='idxworldsummitontheinformationsocietywsis' class='startofrange'><primary>World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS)</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 Indeed, I was once publicly scolded for not recognizing this fact
 about WIPO. In February 2003, I delivered a keynote address to a
@@ -13071,6 +13077,7 @@ had thought it was taken for granted that WIPO could and should. And
 thus the meeting about <quote>open and collaborative projects to create
 public goods</quote> seemed perfectly appropriate within the WIPO agenda.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxworldsummitontheinformationsocietywsis' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm><primary>Apple Corporation</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 But there is one project within that list that is highly
@@ -13185,7 +13192,10 @@ in understanding&mdash;the sort of mistake that is excusable in a
 first-year law student, but an embarrassment from a high government
 official dealing with intellectual property issues.
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS)</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>drugs</primary><secondary>pharmaceutical</secondary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>generic drugs</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>patents</primary><secondary>on pharmaceuticals</secondary></indexterm>
 <para>
 Second, who ever said that WIPO's exclusive aim was to <quote>promote</quote>
 intellectual property maximally? As I had been scolded at the