Index.

[text-free-culture-lessig.git] / freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index e44fb45d9e2606d7f1e8b578a2ed35fbfd9cf6c0..2f131188494e55e9c51edeb9aa0674ed91e08950 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -1071,6 +1071,7 @@ from someone else without permission is wrong. It is a form of
 piracy.
 </para>
 </blockquote>
+<indexterm><primary>Dreyfuss, Rochelle</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 This view runs deep within the current debates. It is what NYU law
 professor Rochelle Dreyfuss criticizes as the "if value, then right" 
@@ -3282,7 +3283,9 @@ childhood.
 If a country is to be treated as a sovereign, however, then its laws are
 its laws regardless of their source. The international law under which
 these nations live gives them some opportunities to escape the burden
-of intellectual property law.<footnote><para>
+of intellectual property law.<footnote>
+<indexterm><primary>Drahos, Peter</primary></indexterm>
+<para>
 <!-- f2 -->
 See Peter Drahos with John Braithwaite, Information Feudalism: Who
 Owns the Knowledge Economy? (New York: The New Press, 2003), 10&ndash;13,
@@ -5159,6 +5162,7 @@ And no doubt, the product itself was exceptionally good. Eastwood
 loved it, and it sold very well.
 </para>
 <indexterm><primary>Alben, Alex</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Drucker, Peter</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 But I pressed Alben about how weird it seems that it would have to
 take a year's work simply to clear rights. No doubt Alben had done
@@ -12204,6 +12208,7 @@ Africa from India. This is called "parallel importation," and it is
 generally permitted under international trade law and is specifically
 permitted within the European Union.<footnote>
 <indexterm><primary>Braithwaite, John</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Drahos, Peter</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 <!-- f2. -->
 See Peter Drahos with John Braithwaite, Information Feudalism: Who
@@ -12664,7 +12669,9 @@ that control.
 <indexterm><primary>Braithwaite, John</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 As Peter Drahos and John Braithwaite relate, this is precisely the
-choice we are now making about intellectual property.<footnote><para>
+choice we are now making about intellectual property.<footnote>
+<indexterm><primary>Drahos, Peter</primary></indexterm>
+<para>
 <!-- f10. -->
 See Drahos with Braithwaite, Information Feudalism, 210&ndash;20.
 </para></footnote>
@@ -12682,7 +12689,7 @@ that was particularly depressing for me. An anonymous poster wrote,
 <para>
 George, you misunderstand Lessig: He's only talking about the world as
 it should be ("the goal of WIPO, and the goal of any government,
-should be to promote the right balance of intellectualproperty rights,
+should be to promote the right balance of intellectual property rights,
 not simply to promote intellectual property rights"), not as it is. If
 we were talking about the world as it is, then of course Boland didn't
 say anything wrong. But in the world
@@ -12791,6 +12798,7 @@ called "property" is not well exercised within this tradition anymore.
 If we were Achilles, this would be our heel. This would be the place
 of our tragedy.
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>Dylan, Bob</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 As I write these final words, the news is filled with stories about
 the RIAA lawsuits against almost three hundred individuals.<footnote><para>