Add several indexterm entries after comparing with the ones in http://www.jus.uio...

[text-free-culture-lessig.git] / freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 357b582a3bcfa5569160d841613cab725ceec53c..7f9599dec495f63338b2149ee28412525ca05026 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -4362,6 +4362,8 @@ system to minimize the opportunity for copyright infringement. It did
 not, and for that, Disney and Universal wanted to hold it responsible
 for the architecture it chose.
 </para>
+<indexterm id='idxcongressusoncopyrightlaws3' class='startofrange'><primary>Congress, U.S.</primary><secondary>on copyright laws</secondary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Congress, U.S.</primary><secondary>on VCR technology</secondary></indexterm>
 <para>
 MPAA president Jack Valenti became the studios' most vocal
 champion. Valenti called VCRs <quote>tapeworms.</quote> He warned, <quote>When there are
@@ -4444,6 +4446,7 @@ by such new technology.<footnote><para>
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
 </blockquote>
+<indexterm startref='idxcongressusoncopyrightlaws3' class='endofrange'/>
 <para>
 Congress was asked to respond to the Supreme Court's decision.  But as
 with the plea of recording artists about radio broadcasts, Congress
@@ -4537,6 +4540,7 @@ to $15 million in damages? Would it have been better if Edison had
 controlled film? Should every cover band have to hire a lawyer to get
 permission to record a song?
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>Supreme Court, U.S.</primary><secondary>on balance of interests in copyright law</secondary></indexterm>
 <para>
 We could answer yes to each of these questions, but our tradition
 has answered no. In our tradition, as the Supreme Court has stated,
@@ -4627,6 +4631,7 @@ table in the backyard&mdash;by, for example, going to Sears, buying a
 table, and putting it in my backyard? What is the thing I am taking
 then?
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>Jefferson, Thomas</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 The point is not just about the thingness of picnic tables versus
 ideas, though that's an important difference. The point instead is that
@@ -6308,6 +6313,7 @@ should be accorded the same rights as every other property-right
 owner. He is effectively arguing for a change in our Constitution
 itself.
 </para>
+<indexterm id='idxjeffersonthomas' class='startofrange'><primary>Jefferson, Thomas</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 Arguing for a change in our Constitution is not necessarily wrong.
 There was much in our original Constitution that was plainly wrong.
@@ -6328,6 +6334,8 @@ creative property be given the same rights as all other property? Why
 did they require that for creative property there must be a public
 domain?
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxjeffersonthomas' class='endofrange'/>
+
 <para>
 To answer this question, we need to get some perspective on the
 history of these <quote>creative property</quote> rights, and the control that they
@@ -13894,6 +13902,7 @@ of content (<quote>content conducers,</quote> as attorney Mia Garlick calls them
 who help build the public domain and, by their work, demonstrate the
 importance of the public domain to other creativity.
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>Jefferson, Thomas</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 The aim is not to fight the <quote>All Rights Reserved</quote> sorts. The aim is to
 complement them. The problems that the law creates for us as a culture