Add several indexterm entries after comparing with the ones in http://www.jus.uio...

[text-free-culture-lessig.git] / freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 62e1306e4e14b509a5b0fb4c7d9278c494f0743f..d84fefa565083debdb0f0a165d07c2da4b4489f1 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -5035,9 +5035,6 @@ Statute of Anne copyright had expired. This, they argued, was the only
 way to protect authors.
 </para>
 <indexterm startref='idxbritishparliament2' class='endofrange'/>
-<indexterm id='idxdonaldsonalexander' class='startofrange'><primary>Donaldson, Alexander</primary></indexterm>
-<indexterm><primary>Patterson, Raymond</primary></indexterm>
-<indexterm id='idxscottishpublishers' class='startofrange'><primary>Scottish publishers</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 This was a clever argument, and one that had the support of some of
 the leading jurists of the day. It also displayed extraordinary
@@ -5054,6 +5051,9 @@ Vaidhyanathan, 37&ndash;48.
 The bookseller didn't care squat for the rights of the author.  His
 concern was the monopoly profit that the author's work gave.
 </para>
+<indexterm id='idxdonaldsonalexander' class='startofrange'><primary>Donaldson, Alexander</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Patterson, Raymond</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm id='idxscottishpublishers' class='startofrange'><primary>Scottish publishers</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 The booksellers' argument was not accepted without a fight.
 The hero of this fight was a Scottish bookseller named Alexander
@@ -5063,6 +5063,8 @@ For a compelling account, see David Saunders, <citetitle>Authorship and Copyrigh
 (London: Routledge, 1992), 62&ndash;69.
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
+<indexterm id='idxstatuteofanne3' class='startofrange'><primary>Statute of Anne (1710)</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm id='idxconger' class='startofrange'><primary>Conger</primary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>Boswell, James</primary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>Erskine, Andrew</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
@@ -5085,6 +5087,7 @@ of contemporary Scottish poems with Donaldson.</quote><footnote><para>
 Ibid., 93.
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
+<indexterm id='idxcommonlaw' class='startofrange'><primary>common law</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 When the London booksellers tried to shut down Donaldson's shop in
 Scotland, he responded by moving his shop to London, where he sold
@@ -5100,6 +5103,8 @@ His books undercut the Conger prices by 30 to 50 percent, and he
 rested his right to compete upon the ground that, under the Statute of
 Anne, the works he was selling had passed out of protection.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxconger' class='endofrange'/>
+<indexterm id='idxmillarvtaylor' class='startofrange'><primary>Millar v. Taylor</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 The London booksellers quickly brought suit to block <quote>piracy</quote> like
 Donaldson's. A number of actions were successful against the <quote>pirates,</quote>
@@ -5107,6 +5112,8 @@ the most important early victory being <citetitle>Millar</citetitle> v. <citetit
 </para>
 <indexterm startref='idxdonaldsonalexander' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm startref='idxscottishpublishers' class='endofrange'/>
+<indexterm id='idxthomsonjames' class='startofrange'><primary>Thomson, James</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm id='idxcopyrightinperpetuity2' class='startofrange'><primary>copyright</primary><secondary>in perpetuity</secondary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>Seasons, The (Thomson)</primary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>Taylor, Robert</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
@@ -5134,6 +5141,10 @@ reprinting Thomson's poem without Millar's permission. That common law
 rule thus effectively gave the booksellers a perpetual right to
 control the publication of any book assigned to them.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxcommonlaw' class='endofrange'/>
+<indexterm startref='idxthomsonjames' class='endofrange'/>
+<indexterm startref='idxcopyrightinperpetuity2' class='endofrange'/>
+<indexterm id='idxbritishparliament3' class='startofrange'><primary>British Parliament</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 Considered as a matter of abstract justice&mdash;reasoning as if
 justice were just a matter of logical deduction from first
@@ -5149,11 +5160,16 @@ believed, Britain would mature from the controlled culture that the
 Crown coveted to the free culture that we inherited.
 </para>
 <indexterm startref='idxmansfieldwilliammurraylord2' class='endofrange'/>
+<indexterm id='idxdonaldsonalexander2' class='startofrange'><primary>Donaldson, Alexander</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm id='idxscottishpublishers2' class='startofrange'><primary>Scottish publishers</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 The fight to defend the limits of the Statute of Anne was not to end
 there, however, and it is here that Donaldson enters the mix.
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>Thomson, James</primary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>Beckett, Thomas</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm id='idxhouseoflords' class='startofrange'><primary>House of Lords</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm id='idxsupremecourtushouseoflordsvs' class='startofrange'><primary>Supreme Court, U.S.</primary><secondary>House of Lords vs.</secondary></indexterm>
 <para>
 Millar died soon after his victory, so his case was not appealed. His
 estate sold Thomson's poems to a syndicate of printers that included
@@ -5168,6 +5184,8 @@ the House of Lords, which functioned much like our own Supreme
 Court. In February of 1774, that body had the chance to interpret the
 meaning of Parliament's limits from sixty years before.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxmillarvtaylor' class='endofrange'/>
+<indexterm startref='idxbritishparliament3' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm id='idxdonaldsonvbeckett' class='startofrange'><primary>Donaldson v. Beckett</primary></indexterm>
 <indexterm id='idxcommonlaw2' class='startofrange'><primary>common law</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
@@ -5180,6 +5198,7 @@ publication came from that statute. Thus, they argued, after the term
 specified in the Statute of Anne expired, works that had been
 protected by the statute were no longer protected.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxstatuteofanne3' class='endofrange'/>
 <para>
 The House of Lords was an odd institution. Legal questions were
 presented to the House and voted upon first by the <quote>law lords,</quote>
@@ -5187,6 +5206,7 @@ members of special legal distinction who functioned much like the
 Justices in our Supreme Court. Then, after the law lords voted, the
 House of Lords generally voted.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxsupremecourtushouseoflordsvs' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm id='idxcopyrightinperpetuity3' class='startofrange'><primary>copyright</primary><secondary>in perpetuity</secondary></indexterm>
 <indexterm id='idxpublicdomainenglishlegalestablishmentof' class='startofrange'><primary>public domain</primary><secondary>English legal establishment of</secondary></indexterm>
 <para>
@@ -5214,6 +5234,8 @@ over creative works expired, and the greatest works in English
 history&mdash;including those of Shakespeare, Bacon, Milton, Johnson,
 and Bunyan&mdash;were free of legal restraint.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxdonaldsonalexander2' class='endofrange'/>
+<indexterm startref='idxscottishpublishers2' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm startref='idxcommonlaw2' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm startref='idxcopyrightinperpetuity3' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm startref='idxpublicdomainenglishlegalestablishmentof' class='endofrange'/>
@@ -5232,6 +5254,7 @@ and illuminations.</quote><footnote><para>
 Rose, 97.
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxhouseoflords' class='endofrange'/>
 <para>
 In London, however, at least among publishers, the reaction was
 equally strong in the opposite direction. The <citetitle>Morning Chronicle</citetitle>