Update to current version.

[text-free-culture-lessig.git] / freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index d43d001b006ec7fa76adad9e2f54ea0bd7b2305d..10bec1117c815b41e41311d53921cbb6a50d4418 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -1285,6 +1285,9 @@ context the current battles about behavior labeled <quote>piracy.</quote>
 <indexterm id="idxanimadedcartoons" class='startofrange'>
   <primary>animated cartoons</primary>
 </indexterm>
+<indexterm id='idxcartoonfilms' class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>cartoon films</primary>
+</indexterm>
 <para>
 <emphasis role="strong">In 1928</emphasis>, a cartoon character was born. An early Mickey Mouse
 made his debut in May of that year, in a silent flop called <citetitle>Plane Crazy</citetitle>.
@@ -1483,6 +1486,7 @@ to now be free for the next Walt Disney to build upon without
 permission. Yet today, the public domain is presumptive only for
 content from before the Great Depression.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxcartoonfilms' class='endofrange'/>
 <para>
 <emphasis role="strong">Of course</emphasis>, Walt Disney had no monopoly on <quote>Walt Disney creativity.</quote>
 Nor does America. The norm of free culture has, until recently, and
@@ -1743,6 +1747,9 @@ free culture. It is becoming much less so.
 </chapter>
 <chapter label="2" id="mere-copyists">
 <title>CHAPTER TWO: <quote>Mere Copyists</quote></title>
+<indexterm id='idxcameratech' class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>camera technology</primary>
+</indexterm>
 <indexterm id="idxphotography" class='startofrange'>
   <primary>photography</primary>
 </indexterm>
@@ -1832,6 +1839,7 @@ an average annual increase of over 17 percent.<footnote><para>
 Based on a chart in Jenkins, p. 178.
 </para></footnote>
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxcameratech' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm><primary>Coe, Brian</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 
@@ -1958,6 +1966,7 @@ that growth would have been realized. And certainly, nothing like that
 growth in a democratic technology of expression would have been
 realized.
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>camera technology</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 <emphasis role='strong'>If you drive</emphasis> through San
 Francisco's Presidio, you might see two gaudy yellow school buses
@@ -3259,8 +3268,10 @@ to take something for nothing.
 </section>
 <section id="cabletv">
 <title>Cable TV</title>
+<indexterm id='idxcabletv1' class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>cable television</primary>
+</indexterm>
 <para>
-
 Cable TV was also born of a kind of piracy.
 </para>
 <para>
@@ -3376,6 +3387,7 @@ exercise veto power over the emerging technologies of cable. Cable
 companies thus built their empire in part upon a <quote>piracy</quote> of the value
 created by broadcasters' content.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxcabletv1' class='endofrange'/>
 <para>
 <emphasis role='strong'>These separate stories</emphasis> sing a
 common theme. If <quote>piracy</quote> means using value from someone
@@ -4133,6 +4145,9 @@ respected (since the radio station did not have to pay them for the
 creativity it broadcast), Congress rejected their claim. An indirect
 benefit was enough.
 </para>
+<indexterm id='idxcabletv2' class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>cable television</primary>
+</indexterm>
 <para>
 Cable TV followed the pattern of record albums. When the courts
 rejected the claim that cable broadcasters had to pay for the content
@@ -4159,6 +4174,7 @@ Congress chose a path that would assure
 <emphasis>compensation</emphasis> without giving the past
 (broadcasters) control over the future (cable).
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='idxcabletv2' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm><primary>Betamax</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 In the same year that Congress struck this balance, two major
@@ -4279,7 +4295,7 @@ together, a pattern is clear:
 </para>
 
 <informaltable id="t1">
-<tgroup cols="4" align="char">
+<tgroup cols="4" align="left">
 <thead>
  <row>
  <entry>CASE</entry>
@@ -6452,6 +6468,7 @@ Brown describes it, its <quote>architecture of revenue.</quote>
 </para>
 <indexterm><primary>railroad industry</primary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>advertising</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>camera technology</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 But just because a particular interest asks for government support, it
 doesn't follow that support should be granted. And just because
@@ -7311,6 +7328,7 @@ to video stores. The video stores displayed the trailers as a way to sell
 videos. Video Pipeline got the trailers from the film distributors, put
 the trailers on tape, and sold the tapes to the retail stores.
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>browsing</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 The company did this for about fifteen years. Then, in 1997, it began
 to think about the Internet as another way to distribute these
@@ -7370,6 +7388,7 @@ control. The technology expands the scope of effective control,
 because the technology builds a copy into every transaction.
 </para>
 <indexterm><primary>Barnes &amp; Noble</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>browsing</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 158 -->
 No doubt, a potential is not yet an abuse, and so the potential for
@@ -8125,6 +8144,7 @@ of the media.
 These changes are of two sorts: the scope of concentration, and its
 nature.
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>cable television</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 Changes in scope are the easier ones to describe. As Senator John
 McCain summarized the data produced in the FCC's review of media
@@ -8163,6 +8183,7 @@ markets, the two largest broadcasters control 74 percent of that
 market's revenues. Overall, just four companies control 90 percent of
 the nation's radio advertising revenues.
 </para>
+<indexterm><primary>cable television</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 Newspaper ownership is becoming more concentrated as well.  Today,
 there are six hundred fewer daily newspapers in the United States than
@@ -8584,7 +8605,7 @@ that copyright law has undergone.  In 1790, the law looked like this:
 </para>
 
 <informaltable id="t2">
-<tgroup cols="3" align="char">
+<tgroup cols="3" align="left">
 <thead>
  <row>
  <entry></entry>
@@ -8621,7 +8642,7 @@ By the end of the nineteenth century, the law had changed to this:
 </para>
 
 <informaltable id="t3">
-<tgroup cols="3" align="char">
+<tgroup cols="3" align="left">
 <thead>
  <row>
  <entry></entry>
@@ -8659,7 +8680,7 @@ we could say the law began to look like this:
 </para>
 
 <informaltable id="t4">
-<tgroup cols="3" align="char">
+<tgroup cols="3" align="left">
 <thead>
  <row>
  <entry></entry>
@@ -8691,7 +8712,7 @@ that the law now looks like this:
 </para>
 
 <informaltable id="t5">
-<tgroup cols="3" align="char">
+<tgroup cols="3" align="left">
 <thead>
  <row>
  <entry></entry>
@@ -9509,6 +9530,7 @@ discussion with BMW:
 </para>
 <blockquote>
 <indexterm><primary>BMW</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>cars, MP3 sound system in</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 I asked why, with all the storage capacity and computer power in
 the car, there was no way to play MP3 files. I was told that BMW
@@ -13449,6 +13471,9 @@ before.
 
 <section id="examples">
 <title>Rebuilding Freedoms Previously Presumed: Examples</title>
+<indexterm id='browsing' class='startofrange'>
+  <primary>browsing</primary>
+</indexterm>
 <para>
 If you step back from the battle I've been describing here, you will
 recognize this problem from other contexts. Think about
@@ -13501,6 +13526,7 @@ you. If it becomes simple to gather and sort who does what in
 electronic spaces, then the friction-induced privacy of yesterday
 disappears.
 </para>
+<indexterm startref='browsing' class='endofrange'/>
 <para>
 It is this reality that explains the push of many to define <quote>privacy</quote>
 on the Internet. It is the recognition that technology can remove what
@@ -14686,6 +14712,7 @@ there will be a great deal of competition to offer and sell music
 on-line.
 </para>
 <indexterm><primary>Asia, commercial piracy in</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>cable television</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
 This competition has already occurred against the background of <quote>free</quote>
 music from p2p systems. As the sellers of cable television have known
@@ -14910,6 +14937,9 @@ alive, you will be redirected to that link. If the original link has
 disappeared, you will be redirected to an appropriate reference for
 the material.
 </para>
+
+<!-- insert endnotes here -->
+
 <!--PAGE BREAK 336-->
 
 </chapter>