Example editor and contributor entries.

[text-free-culture-lessig.git] / freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index ec0f2e916adff1b508535367766975c8b2772471..a83831fe4f0cb561e94268bb4e76a0d7e0b00fda 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -30,6 +30,20 @@
    <firstname>Lawrence</firstname>
    <surname>Lessig</surname>
   </author>
+<!--
+  Keep these out to avoid showing up as author in the PDF.
+
+  <editor>
+   <firstname>Petter</firstname>
+   <surname>Reinholdtsen</surname>
+  </editor>
+
+  <othercredit role='converter'>
+    <firstname>Petter</firstname>
+    <surname>Reinholdtsen</surname>
+    <contrib>Created this Docbook version from an earlier version</contrib>
+  </othercredit>
+-->
  </authorgroup>
 
 <!-- <subjectset> and cover <mediaobject> Based on example from
@@ -139,9 +153,27 @@ Appeals.
 ALSO BY LAWRENCE LESSIG
 </para>
 <para>
+<!-- 2014 -->
+The USA is lesterland: The nature of congressional corruption
+</para>
+<para>
+<!-- 2011, 2012 -->
+Republic, lost: How money corrupts Congress - and a plan to stop it 
+</para>
+<para>
+<!-- 2008 -->
+Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy
+</para>
+<para>
+<!-- 2006 -->
+Code: Version 2.0
+</para>
+<para>
+<!-- 2001, 2002 -->
 The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World
 </para>
 <para>
+<!-- 1999 -->
 Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace
 </para>
 </dedication>
@@ -7553,8 +7585,8 @@ Obviously, however, some uses of a copyrighted book are regulated
 by copyright law. Republishing the book, for example, makes a copy. It
 is therefore regulated by copyright law. Indeed, this particular use stands
 at the core of this circle of possible uses of a copyrighted work. It is the
-paradigmatic use properly regulated by copyright regulation (see first
-diagram on next page).
+paradigmatic use properly regulated by copyright regulation (see  
+diagram in <xref linkend="fig-1541"/>).
 </para>
 <indexterm startref='idxderivativeworkspiracyvs4' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm startref='idxpiracyderivativeworkvs4' class='endofrange'/>
@@ -7908,8 +7940,8 @@ technology, and the publisher delivers the content by using the
 technology.
 </para>
 <para>
-On the next page is a picture of an old version of my Adobe eBook
-Reader.
+In <xref linkend="fig-1611"/> is a picture of an old version of my
+Adobe eBook Reader.
 </para>
 <para>
 As you can see, I have a small collection of e-books within this
@@ -9101,7 +9133,7 @@ we could say the law began to look like this:
  </row>
  <row>
  <entry>Noncommercial</entry>
- <entry>&copy;/Free</entry>
+ <entry>&copy; / Free</entry>
  <entry>Free</entry>
  </row>
 </tbody>
@@ -9602,7 +9634,7 @@ on remote topics of science or culture. There is a vast amount of creative
 work spread across the Internet. But as the law is currently crafted, this
 work is presumptively illegal.
 </para>
-<indexterm><primary>Worldcom</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>WorldCom</primary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>copyright infringement lawsuits</primary><secondary>exaggerated claims of</secondary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>copyright infringement lawsuits</primary><secondary>in recording industry</secondary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>doctors malpractice claims against</primary></indexterm>
@@ -9626,7 +9658,7 @@ See Lynne W. Jeter, <citetitle>Disconnected: Deceit and Betrayal at WorldCom</ci
 the settlement, see MCI press release, <quote>MCI Wins U.S. District Court
 Approval for SEC Settlement</quote> (7 July 2003), available at
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #37</ulink>.
-<indexterm><primary>Worldcom</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>WorldCom</primary></indexterm>
 </para></footnote>
 And under legislation being pushed in Congress right now, a doctor who
 negligently removes the wrong leg in an operation would be liable for
@@ -12706,8 +12738,8 @@ in a time of such fruitful creative ferment.
 <para>
 The best responses were in the cartoons. There was a gaggle of
 hilarious images&mdash;of Mickey in jail and the like. The best, from
-my view of the case, was Ruben Bolling's, reproduced on the next page
-(<xref linkend="fig-18"/>). The <quote>powerful and wealthy</quote> line is a bit
+my view of the case, was Ruben Bolling's, reproduced in
+<xref linkend="fig-18"/>. The <quote>powerful and wealthy</quote> line is a bit
 unfair. But the punch in the face felt exactly like that.
 <indexterm><primary>Bolling, Ruben</primary></indexterm>
 </para>