Proof read.

[text-free-culture-lessig.git] / freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index ec0f2e916adff1b508535367766975c8b2772471..aa05385cc2657113bbb94c0ea01afbbd48678f39 100644 (file)
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -7553,8 +7553,8 @@ Obviously, however, some uses of a copyrighted book are regulated
 by copyright law. Republishing the book, for example, makes a copy. It
 is therefore regulated by copyright law. Indeed, this particular use stands
 at the core of this circle of possible uses of a copyrighted work. It is the
-paradigmatic use properly regulated by copyright regulation (see first
-diagram on next page).
+paradigmatic use properly regulated by copyright regulation (see 
+diagram <xref xrefstyle="select: labelnumber" linkend="fig-1541"/>).
 </para>
 <indexterm startref='idxderivativeworkspiracyvs4' class='endofrange'/>
 <indexterm startref='idxpiracyderivativeworkvs4' class='endofrange'/>
@@ -7908,8 +7908,8 @@ technology, and the publisher delivers the content by using the
 technology.
 </para>
 <para>
-On the next page is a picture of an old version of my Adobe eBook
-Reader.
+On the next page (<xref linkend="fig-1611"/>) is a picture of an old
+version of my Adobe eBook Reader.
 </para>
 <para>
 As you can see, I have a small collection of e-books within this
@@ -9101,7 +9101,7 @@ we could say the law began to look like this:
  </row>
  <row>
  <entry>Noncommercial</entry>
- <entry>&copy;/Free</entry>
+ <entry>&copy; / Free</entry>
  <entry>Free</entry>
  </row>
 </tbody>
@@ -9602,7 +9602,7 @@ on remote topics of science or culture. There is a vast amount of creative
 work spread across the Internet. But as the law is currently crafted, this
 work is presumptively illegal.
 </para>
-<indexterm><primary>Worldcom</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>WorldCom</primary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>copyright infringement lawsuits</primary><secondary>exaggerated claims of</secondary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>copyright infringement lawsuits</primary><secondary>in recording industry</secondary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>doctors malpractice claims against</primary></indexterm>
@@ -9626,7 +9626,7 @@ See Lynne W. Jeter, <citetitle>Disconnected: Deceit and Betrayal at WorldCom</ci
 the settlement, see MCI press release, <quote>MCI Wins U.S. District Court
 Approval for SEC Settlement</quote> (7 July 2003), available at
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #37</ulink>.
-<indexterm><primary>Worldcom</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>WorldCom</primary></indexterm>
 </para></footnote>
 And under legislation being pushed in Congress right now, a doctor who
 negligently removes the wrong leg in an operation would be liable for