Add quote.

diff --git a/blog/data/2017-11-01-storage-fault-tolerance.txt b/blog/data/2017-11-01-storage-fault-tolerance.txt
index 4cd7187f5011cddbd47985b88febb9641689aed4..c470083018b5f407a807fb48b81c5b142d201534 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/data/2017-11-01-storage-fault-tolerance.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2017-11-01-storage-fault-tolerance.txt
@@ -64,7 +64,10 @@ redundant storage systems.  Details matter.  And unfortunately there
 are few options on Linux addressing all the identified issues.  Both
 ZFS and Btrfs are doing a fairly good job, but have legal and
 practical issues on their own.  I wonder how cluster file systems like
-Ceph do in this regard.</p>
+Ceph do in this regard.  After, all the old saying, you know you have
+a distributed system when the crash of a compyter you have never heard
+of stops you from getting any work done.  The same holds true if fault
+tolerance do not work.</p>
 
 <p>Just remember, in the end, it do not matter how redundant, or how
 fault tolerant your storage is, if you do not continuously monitor its