Generated.

diff --git a/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html b/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html
index e398a9af8253a2d80ca13266666953a5c574b015..9864e5461883b457dc4958a24b0578c7e0a7c908 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html
+++ b/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html
@@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 <p>So, I can conclude that sshfs is better than smb to a Netapp or a
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
+
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
 </div>
   
   <div class="tags">Tags: <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/debian edu">debian edu</a>, <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/english">english</a>, <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/nuug">nuug</a>.</div>

diff --git a/blog/archive/2010/08/08.rss b/blog/archive/2010/08/08.rss
index 0ece95941a9ccddef051d30aebf2ae7ba5b65221..23bfdc91e8aa12cd5cf7fca8bb0d0eeb5aa7c04a 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/archive/2010/08/08.rss
+++ b/blog/archive/2010/08/08.rss
@@ -696,6 +696,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 <p>So, I can conclude that sshfs is better than smb to a Netapp or a
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
+
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
 </description>
        </item>
        

diff --git a/blog/archive/2010/08/index.html b/blog/archive/2010/08/index.html
index 233bd8a5420299d54b863cc1832cdc873dbeb543..28d2bbc6f540b89615e0bfc903a47719d514a91f 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/archive/2010/08/index.html
+++ b/blog/archive/2010/08/index.html
@@ -819,6 +819,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
 
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
+
  </div>
  <div class="tags">
  

diff --git a/blog/index.html b/blog/index.html
index 1e775c949a54708f4d868e408a20bddf8eedadc8..8109a36768403dbebfa71cdc99808871de1e5a93 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/index.html
+++ b/blog/index.html
@@ -115,6 +115,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 <p>So, I can conclude that sshfs is better than smb to a Netapp or a
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
+
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
 </div>
   <div class="tags">
    
@@ -967,7 +970,7 @@ it.</p>
 </div>
 
 <p style="text-align: right">
-Created by <a href="http://steve.org.uk/Software/chronicle">Chronicle v3.2</a>
+Created by <a href="http://steve.org.uk/Software/chronicle">Chronicle v3.7</a>
 </p>
 </body>
 </html>

diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss
index b17eaee40b28cd99ab8d224d266a2abffe957f79..287b3732eef0f7fe3119c35aea07630723ce3b68 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/index.rss
+++ b/blog/index.rss
@@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 <p>So, I can conclude that sshfs is better than smb to a Netapp or a
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
+
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
 </description>
        </item>
        

diff --git a/blog/sitemap.xml b/blog/sitemap.xml
index aa9b18aba587486de19640b92c9e14811066a56c..44b43f53a3986412de488adb654e122328062c1f 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/sitemap.xml
+++ b/blog/sitemap.xml
@@ -60,6 +60,11 @@
   <priority>0.50</priority>
   <changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
  </url>
+ <url>
+  <loc>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Broken_umask_handling_with_sshfs.html</loc>
+  <priority>0.50</priority>
+  <changefreq>weekly</changefreq>
+ </url>
  <url>
   <loc>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/BSAs_p__stander_om_piratkopiering_m__ter_motstand.html</loc>
   <priority>0.50</priority>

diff --git a/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss b/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss
index ea8db9592868ba1eb806066768dc9829e87149fd..a451738af890e3d651fdcd9972ebbaa109529930 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss
+++ b/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss
@@ -2884,6 +2884,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 <p>So, I can conclude that sshfs is better than smb to a Netapp or a
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
+
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
 </description>
        </item>
        

diff --git a/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html b/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html
index ffa5b6213059c57043c592ab8ce5123efaf7a156..39069103fe1be8937aee32e9a007a7c62e0a95d7 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html
+++ b/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html
@@ -3424,6 +3424,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
 
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
+
  </div>
  <div class="tags">
  

diff --git a/blog/tags/english/english.rss b/blog/tags/english/english.rss
index 1c20b427011590d37bf798823ea2136e4c9e0aa0..48810f0b1c829f22f176f053927710dc8e272059 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/english/english.rss
+++ b/blog/tags/english/english.rss
@@ -3613,6 +3613,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 <p>So, I can conclude that sshfs is better than smb to a Netapp or a
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
+
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
 </description>
        </item>
        

diff --git a/blog/tags/english/index.html b/blog/tags/english/index.html
index 3af0d8c1de19fb7a622d92f63b449a88b6e80470..f3f8c4aa825601e868b9173e62dd2c4e7737ae48 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/english/index.html
+++ b/blog/tags/english/index.html
@@ -4361,6 +4361,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
 
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
+
  </div>
  <div class="tags">
  

diff --git a/blog/tags/nuug/index.html b/blog/tags/nuug/index.html
index 7a6f3280a9a461655e3ae127f0eef33b6f2b2a6e..0a61679ff23af68b0296a4c86181deee814a0e4e 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/nuug/index.html
+++ b/blog/tags/nuug/index.html
@@ -6148,6 +6148,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
 
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
+
  </div>
  <div class="tags">
  

diff --git a/blog/tags/nuug/nuug.rss b/blog/tags/nuug/nuug.rss
index d041488903c90370ceb94f14941652c52870f63e..2d21d102fa3bd81c60d0f0d3b197b5816a114ae1 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/nuug/nuug.rss
+++ b/blog/tags/nuug/nuug.rss
@@ -4880,6 +4880,9 @@ info: testing umask effect on file creation
 <p>So, I can conclude that sshfs is better than smb to a Netapp or a
 Windows server, but not good enough to be used as a home
 directory.</p>
+
+<p>Update 2010-08-26: Reported the issue in
+<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/594498">BTS report #594498</a></p>
 </description>
        </item>