are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>
are limited and I ended up bying the camera anyway. What is the
problem, you might ask? It is software patents, MPEG-4, H.264 and the
MPEG-LA that is the problem, and our right to record our experiences
-that is at risk.
+without asking for permissions that is at risk.
<p>On page 27 of the Danish instruction manual, this section is
written:</p>