the expected state. The other is that single user boot will sometimes
run into problems because some of the subsystems are activated before
the root login is presented, causing problems when trying to recover a
-machine. A minor point is that moving more scripts out of rcS.d/ and
-into the other rc#.d/ directories will increase the amount of scripts
-that can run in parallel during boot, and thus increase the speed
-time.</p>
+machine from a problem in that subsystem. A minor additional point is
+that moving more scripts out of rcS.d/ and into the other rc#.d/
+directories will increase the amount of scripts that can run in
+parallel during boot, and thus decrease the speed time.</p>
<p>So, which scripts should start from rcS.d/. In short, only the
scripts that _have_ to execute before the root login prompt is
should go into the numeric runlevels. This means things like
lm-sensors, fuse and x11-common should not run from rcS.d, but from
the numeric runlevels. Today in Debian, there are around 115 init.d
-scripts that are starte from rcS.d/, and most of them should be moved
+scripts that are started from rcS.d/, and most of them should be moved
out. Do your package have one of them? Please help us make single
user and runlevel 1 better by moving it.</p>
scripts need to be moved from rcS.d/ to rc2.d/ in reverse dependency
order, ie the scripts that nothing in rcS.d/ depend on can be moved,
and the next ones can only be moved when their dependencies have been
-moved first. This migration must be done sequencially while we ensure
+moved first. This migration must be done sequentially while we ensure
that the package system upgrade packages in the right order to keep
the system state correct. This will require some coordination when it
comes to network related packages, but most of the packages with