<link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/</link>
<atom:link href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/index.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
+ <item>
+ <title>NUUGs spørreundersøkelse for 2012 endelig åpnet</title>
+ <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/NUUGs_sp_rreunders_kelse_for_2012_endelig__pnet.html</link>
+ <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/NUUGs_sp_rreunders_kelse_for_2012_endelig__pnet.html</guid>
+ <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
+ <description><p>Etter flere års pause fikk vi i NUUG endelig i dag
+<a href="http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/interesserte/2012-October/000505.html">annonsert
+spørreundersøkelse</a> for medlemmer og likesinnede personer. Siste
+undersøkelse var i 2009, så det blir interessant å se hvordan svarene
+har endret seg siden da.</p>
+
+<p>Alle kan delta.
+<a href="https://nettskjema.uio.no/answer/45826.html">Skjemaet</a> har
+har 27 spørsmål og vil ta om lag fem minutt å fylle ut.</p>
+</description>
+ </item>
+
<item>
<title>Må kommuner journalføre og svare på henvendelser fra innbyggerne?</title>
<link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/M__kommuner_journalf_re_og_svare_p__henvendelser_fra_innbyggerne_.html</link>
<tr><td>2012-07-27</td><td>Inn</td><td>Foreleggelse - Manglende svar fra Lødningen kommune - Foreløpig svar (2012/14432)</td></tr>
<tr><td>2012-07-30</td><td>Ut</td><td>Vedrørnede utsatt frist - Manglende svar fra Lødingen kommune (2012/14445)</td></tr>
<tr><td>2012-09-24</td><td>Ut</td><td>Påminnelse - Manglende svar fra Lødingen kommune (2012/17986)</td></tr>
-
</table>
<p>Det blir interessant å følge denne saken videre. Jeg har ikke
</description>
</item>
- <item>
- <title>IETF activity to standardise video codec</title>
- <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_activity_to_standardise_video_codec.html</link>
- <guid isPermaLink="true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_activity_to_standardise_video_codec.html</guid>
- <pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:00:00 +0200</pubDate>
- <description><p>After the
-<a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_standardize_its_first_multimedia_codec__Opus.html">Opus
-codec made</a> it into <a href="http://www.ietf.org/">IETF</a> as
-<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6716">RFC 6716</a>, I had a look
-to see if there is any activity in IETF to standardise a video codec
-too, and I was happy to discover that there is some activity in this
-area. A non-"working group" mailing list
-<a href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec">video-codec</a>
-was
-<a href="http://ietf.10.n7.nabble.com/New-Non-WG-Mailing-List-video-codec-Video-codec-BoF-discussion-list-td119548.html">created 2012-08-20</a>. It is intended to discuss the topic and if a
-formal working group should be formed.</p>
-
-<p>I look forward to see how this plays out. There is already
-<a href="http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec/current/msg00003.html">an
-email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to
-participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given
-that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced
-multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect
-joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not
-involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p>
-
-<p>If one of my readers is involved with codec work, I hope she will
-join this work to standardise a royalty free video codec within
-IETF.</p>
-</description>
- </item>
-
</channel>
</rss>