X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/blobdiff_plain/aa89283e06b4c3af18ed49d52859b122d1dedb32..df1b8578e63b5f347dfbe14b9e1741b47143d1af:/blog/index.rss diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss index edab751556..c9401f2c6f 100644 --- a/blog/index.rss +++ b/blog/index.rss @@ -6,6 +6,23 @@ http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/ + + NUUGs spørreundersøkelse for 2012 endelig åpnet + http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/NUUGs_sp_rreunders_kelse_for_2012_endelig__pnet.html + http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/NUUGs_sp_rreunders_kelse_for_2012_endelig__pnet.html + Wed, 10 Oct 2012 23:00:00 +0200 + <p>Etter flere års pause fikk vi i NUUG endelig i dag +<a href="http://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/interesserte/2012-October/000505.html">annonsert +spørreundersøkelse</a> for medlemmer og likesinnede personer. Siste +undersøkelse var i 2009, så det blir interessant å se hvordan svarene +har endret seg siden da.</p> + +<p>Alle kan delta. +<a href="https://nettskjema.uio.no/answer/45826.html">Skjemaet</a> har +har 27 spørsmål og vil ta om lag fem minutt å fylle ut.</p> + + + Må kommuner journalføre og svare på henvendelser fra innbyggerne? http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/M__kommuner_journalf_re_og_svare_p__henvendelser_fra_innbyggerne_.html @@ -37,7 +54,6 @@ journal-ID): <tr><td>2012-07-27</td><td>Inn</td><td>Foreleggelse - Manglende svar fra Lødningen kommune - Foreløpig svar (2012/14432)</td></tr> <tr><td>2012-07-30</td><td>Ut</td><td>Vedrørnede utsatt frist - Manglende svar fra Lødingen kommune (2012/14445)</td></tr> <tr><td>2012-09-24</td><td>Ut</td><td>Påminnelse - Manglende svar fra Lødingen kommune (2012/17986)</td></tr> - </table> <p>Det blir interessant å følge denne saken videre. Jeg har ikke @@ -458,37 +474,5 @@ til slutt så lite at frykten for å frigjøre data overvinnes.</p> - - IETF activity to standardise video codec - http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_activity_to_standardise_video_codec.html - http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_activity_to_standardise_video_codec.html - Sat, 15 Sep 2012 20:00:00 +0200 - <p>After the -<a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_standardize_its_first_multimedia_codec__Opus.html">Opus -codec made</a> it into <a href="http://www.ietf.org/">IETF</a> as -<a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6716">RFC 6716</a>, I had a look -to see if there is any activity in IETF to standardise a video codec -too, and I was happy to discover that there is some activity in this -area. A non-"working group" mailing list -<a href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec">video-codec</a> -was -<a href="http://ietf.10.n7.nabble.com/New-Non-WG-Mailing-List-video-codec-Video-codec-BoF-discussion-list-td119548.html">created 2012-08-20</a>. It is intended to discuss the topic and if a -formal working group should be formed.</p> - -<p>I look forward to see how this plays out. There is already -<a href="http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/video-codec/current/msg00003.html">an -email from someone</a> in the MPEG group at ISO asking people to -participate in the ISO group. Given how ISO failed with OOXML and given -that it so far (as far as I can remember) only have produced -multimedia formats requiring royalty payments, I suspect -joining the ISO group would be a complete waste of time, but I am not -involved in any codec work and my opinion will not matter much.</p> - -<p>If one of my readers is involved with codec work, I hope she will -join this work to standardise a royalty free video codec within -IETF.</p> - - -