Generated.

[homepage.git] / blog / Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html

diff --git a/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html b/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html
index d36ac732d553634357711d6f960f91722b02e388..e3f12e2bc0ea20345b068e3757423b17b964199d 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html
+++ b/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ are few options on Linux addressing all the identified issues.  Both
 ZFS and Btrfs are doing a fairly good job, but have legal and
 practical issues on their own.  I wonder how cluster file systems like
 Ceph do in this regard.  After all, there is an old saying, you know
-you have a distributed system when the crash of a compyter you have
+you have a distributed system when the crash of a computer you have
 never heard of stops you from getting any work done.  The same holds
 true if fault tolerance do not work.</p>