X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/homepage.git/blobdiff_plain/834625244e97305bc552eaeb5fed85aac172a8fe..ea70595b420dc8bda793ba9a383df1085a9e7c8e:/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html diff --git a/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html b/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html index d36ac732d5..e3f12e2bc0 100644 --- a/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html +++ b/blog/Some_notes_on_fault_tolerant_storage_systems.html @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ are few options on Linux addressing all the identified issues. Both ZFS and Btrfs are doing a fairly good job, but have legal and practical issues on their own. I wonder how cluster file systems like Ceph do in this regard. After all, there is an old saying, you know -you have a distributed system when the crash of a compyter you have +you have a distributed system when the crash of a computer you have never heard of stops you from getting any work done. The same holds true if fault tolerance do not work.