1 Title: Relative popularity of document formats (MS Office vs. ODF)
2 Tags: english, nuug, standard, web
5 <p>Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF
6 and MS Office based formats (not to be mistaken for ISO or ECMA
7 OOXML), to get an idea of their relative usage. I searched using
8 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these results:</P>
11 <tr><th>Type</th><th>ODF</th><th>MS Office</th></tr>
12 <tr><td>Tekst</td> <td>odt:282000</td> <td>docx:308000</td></tr>
13 <tr><td>Presentasjon</td> <td>odp:75600</td> <td>pptx:183000</td></tr>
14 <tr><td>Regneark</td> <td>ods:26500 </td> <td>xlsx:145000</td></tr>
17 <p>Next, I added a 'site:no' limit to get the numbers for Norway, and
18 got these numbers:</p>
21 <tr><th>Type</th><th>ODF</th><th>MS Office</th></tr>
22 <tr><td>Tekst</td> <td>odt:2480 </td> <td>docx:4460</td></tr>
23 <tr><td>Presentasjon</td> <td>odp:299 </td> <td>pptx:741</td></tr>
24 <tr><td>Regneark</td> <td>ods:187 </td> <td>xlsx:372</td></tr>
27 <p>I wonder how these numbers change over time.</p>
29 <p>I am aware of Google returning different results and numbers based
30 on where the search is done, so I guess these numbers will differ if
31 they are conduced in another country. Because of this, I did the same
32 search from a machine in California, USA, a few minutes after the
33 search done from a machine here in Norway.</p>
37 <tr><th>Type</th><th>ODF</th><th>MS Office</th></tr>
38 <tr><td>Tekst</td> <td>odt:129000</td> <td>docx:308000</td></tr>
39 <tr><td>Presentasjon</td> <td>odp:44200</td> <td>pptx:93900</td></tr>
40 <tr><td>Regneark</td> <td>ods:26500 </td> <td>xlsx:82400</td></tr>
43 <p>And with 'site:no':
46 <tr><th>Type</th><th>ODF</th><th>MS Office</th></tr>
47 <tr><td>Tekst</td> <td>odt:2480</td> <td>docx:3410</td></tr>
48 <tr><td>Presentasjon</td> <td>odp:175</td> <td>pptx:604</td></tr>
49 <tr><td>Regneark</td> <td>ods:186 </td> <td>xlsx:296</td></tr>
52 <p>Interesting difference, not sure what to conclude from these