1 <?xml version=
"1.0" encoding=
"utf-8"?>
2 <rss version='
2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/
1.0/' xmlns:
atom=
"http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
4 <title>Petter Reinholdtsen
</title>
5 <description></description>
6 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/
</link>
7 <atom:link href=
"http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/index.rss" rel=
"self" type=
"application/rss+xml" />
10 <title>Call for help from docbook expert to tag Free Culture by Lawrence Lessig
</title>
11 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Call_for_help_from_docbook_expert_to_tag_Free_Culture_by_Lawrence_Lessig.html
</link>
12 <guid isPermaLink=
"true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Call_for_help_from_docbook_expert_to_tag_Free_Culture_by_Lawrence_Lessig.html
</guid>
13 <pubDate>Mon,
16 Jul
2012 22:
50:
00 +
0200</pubDate>
14 <description><p
>I am currently working on a
15 <a href=
"http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Dugnad_for___sende_norsk_versjon_av_Free_Culture_til_stortingets_representanter_.html
">project
16 to translate
</a
> the book
17 <a href=
"http://free-culture.cc/
">Free Culture
</a
> by Lawrence Lessig
18 to Norwegian. And the source we base our translation on is the
19 <a href=
"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DocBook
">docbook
</a
> version, to
20 allow us to use po4a and .po files to handle the translation, and for
21 this to work well the docbook source document need to be properly
22 tagged. The source files of this project is available from
23 <a href=
"https://github.com/petterreinholdtsen/free-culture-lessig
">github
</a
>.
</p
>
25 <p
>The problem is that the docbook source have flaws, and we have
26 no-one involved in the project that is a docbook expert. Is there a
27 docbook expert somewhere that is interested in helping us create a
28 well tagged docbook version of the book, and adjust our build process
29 for the PDF, EPUB and HTML version of the book? This will provide a
30 well tagged English version (our source document), and make it a lot
31 easier for us to create a good Norwegian version. If you can and want
32 to help, please get in touch with me or fork the github project and
33 send pull requests with fixes. :)
</p
>
38 <title>Fri programvare -
"fri
" som i
"talefrihet
", ikke som i
"fri bar
"</title>
39 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Fri_programvare____fri__som_i__talefrihet___ikke_som_i__fri_bar_.html
</link>
40 <guid isPermaLink=
"true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Fri_programvare____fri__som_i__talefrihet___ikke_som_i__fri_bar_.html
</guid>
41 <pubDate>Sun,
15 Jul
2012 21:
20:
00 +
0200</pubDate>
42 <description><p
>Et ofte brukt sitat i fri programvareverden er Stallman-sitatet
43 «
<a href=
"http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html.en
">Free Software,
44 "free
" as in
"free speech
", not as in
"free beer
"</a
>». Men det er
45 ikke direkte overførbart til norsk, da det baserer seg på koblingen
46 gratis/fri på engelsk. En direkte oversettelse ville være «Fri
47 programvare,
"fri
" som i
"talefrihet
", ikke som
"gratis øl
"», og det
48 går jo glipp av poenget. I forbindelse med at vi er
49 <a href=
"http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Dugnad_for___sende_norsk_versjon_av_Free_Culture_til_stortingets_representanter_.html
">igang
50 med å oversette
</a
> <a href=
"http://free-culture.cc/
">Free Culture
</a
>
51 av Lawrence Lessig, måtte jeg forsøke a finne en bedre
52 oversettelse.
</p
>
54 <p
>Mitt forslag til oversettelse blir dermed å droppe ølet, og heller
55 fokusere på det kjente norske uttrykket
"fri bar
". Dermed blir
56 oversettelsen «Fri programvare -
"fri
" som i
"talefrihet
", ikke som i
57 "fri bar
"».
</p
>
59 <p
>Noen som har bedre forslag?
</p
>
61 <p
>Forøvrig bruker jeg fri programvare som et samlebegrep på norsk for
62 begge de engelske uttrykkene Free Software og Open Source, jamfør
63 <a href=
"http://www.nuug.no/dokumenter/folder-friprogramvare.pdf
">NUUGs
64 lille folder om temaet
</a
>.
</p
>
69 <title>Dugnad for å sende norsk versjon av Free Culture til stortingets representanter!
</title>
70 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Dugnad_for___sende_norsk_versjon_av_Free_Culture_til_stortingets_representanter_.html
</link>
71 <guid isPermaLink=
"true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Dugnad_for___sende_norsk_versjon_av_Free_Culture_til_stortingets_representanter_.html
</guid>
72 <pubDate>Wed,
11 Jul
2012 09:
00:
00 +
0200</pubDate>
73 <description><p
>Da opphavsrettsloven ble revidert i forrige runde rundt
2005, var
74 det skummelt å se hvor lite stortingsrepresentantene forsto hvordan
75 Internet påvirket folks forhold til kulturuttrykk, og min venn Vidar
76 og jeg spekulert på at det hadde kanskje vært fornuftig om samtlige
77 representanter fikk en norsk utgave av boken
78 <a href=
"http://free-culture.cc/
">Free Culture
</a
> av Lawrence Lessig
79 som forklarte litt om problemstillingene. Vi endte opp med å
80 prioritere utvikling i
81 <a href=
"http://www.skolelinux.org/
">Skolelinux
</a
>-prosjektet i
82 stedet, så den oversatte boken så aldri dagens lys. Men i forrige uke
83 ble jeg inspirert til å ta opp tråden og se om det er mulig å få til
84 bokprosjektet denne gang, da det er tydelig at kulturdepartementet i
85 sitt nye forsøk på å gjøre opphavsrettsloven enda mer ubalansert til
86 fordel for forlag og store mediehus fortsatt trenger en annen vinkling
89 <p
>Planen min er å oversette boka på dugnad, sette den opp for
90 trykking med en av de mange
91 <a href=
"http://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trykk_på_forespørsel
">trykk på
92 forespørsel
</a
>-tjenestene, skaffe sponsor til å finansiere trykking
93 til stortingsrepresentantene og alle som har bidratt med
94 oversettelser. Kanskje vi også kan få en avtale med et forlag om
95 publisering når boka er ferdig? Kommentarene til
96 <a href=
"http://newth.net/eirik/
2011/
04/
01/e-selvpublisering/
">Eirik
98 <a href=
"http://www.espen.com/norskblogg/archives/
2008/
09/erfaringer_med_publishing_on_demand.html
">Espen
99 Andersen
</a
> om erfaringene med selvpublisering og trykk på
100 forespørsel er interessante og ikke avskrekkende, og jeg mistenker at
101 <a href=
"http://www.lulu.com/
">Lulu
</a
> er en grei leverandør av
102 trykketjenester til prosjektet.
</p
>
104 <p
>Jeg har satt opp
105 <a href=
"https://github.com/petterreinholdtsen/free-culture-lessig
">et
106 Github-prosjekt
</a
> for a lage boken, basert på Docbook-utgaven jeg
107 fant fra Hans Schou. Skolelinux har hatt byggesystem for å lage
108 oversatt HTML og PDF-utgave av Docbook-bøker i en årrekke, så jeg har
109 kopiert og utvidet dette oppsettet. Originalteksten er i Docbook, og
110 oversettelsen gjøres i .po-filer med hjelp av vanlige
111 oversetterverktøy brukt i fri programvareverden. Dernest tar
112 byggesystemet over og lager PDF og EPUB-utgave av den oversatte
113 teksten. Resultatet kan ses i Github-prosjektet. For å komme raskt
114 igang har jeg brukt maskinoversettelse av alle tekstbitene fra engelsk
115 til norsk, noe som grovoversatte ca.
1300 av de ca.
1700 tekstbitene
116 boken består av. Jeg håper nå at flere kan bidra med å få
117 oversettelsen på plass, slik at teksten kan være klar i løpet av
118 høsten. Når alt er oversatt må teksten gjennomgås for feil og
119 konsistent språk. Totalt er det nok mange timer som trengs for å
120 gjennomføre oversettelsen.
</p
>
122 <p
>Økonomien i dette er ikke avskrekkende.
169
123 stortingsrepresentanter og nesten like mange varamedlemmer bør få
124 bøker, og estimert produduksjonskostnad for hver bok er rundt
6 EURO i
125 følge et raskt estimat fra Lulu. Jeg vet ennå ikke hvor mange sider
126 det blir i størrelsen
5,
5" x
8.5" (det er ca.
140 sider i A4-format),
127 så jeg gjettet på
400 sider. Jeg tror originalutgaven har nesten
400
128 sider. For
169*
2 eksemplarer snakker vi om en trykkekostnad på
129 ca.
2000 EURO, dvs. ca
15 000 NOK. Det burde være mulig å finne en
130 sponsor for å dekke en slik sum. I tillegg kommer distribusjon og
131 porto, som antagelig kommer på like mye.
</p
>
133 <p
>Kan du bidra med oversettelse og docbook-typesetting? Ta kontakt
134 og send patcher i github. Jeg legger gjerne inn folk i prosjektet
135 slik at du kan oppdatere direkte.
</p
>
140 <title>Debian Edu interview: George Bredberg
</title>
141 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Debian_Edu_interview__George_Bredberg.html
</link>
142 <guid isPermaLink=
"true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Debian_Edu_interview__George_Bredberg.html
</guid>
143 <pubDate>Mon,
9 Jul
2012 00:
30:
00 +
0200</pubDate>
144 <description><p
>The
<a href=
"http://www.skolelinux.org/
">Debian Edu /
145 Skolelinux
</a
> project have users all over the globe, but until
146 recently we have not known about any users in Norway
's neighbour
147 country Sweden. This changed when George Bredberg showed up in March
148 this year on the mailing list, asking interesting questions about how
149 to adjust and scale the just released
150 <a href=
"http://www.debian.org/News/
2012/
20120311.html
">Debian Edu
151 Wheezy
</a
> setup to his liking. He granted me an interview, and I am
152 happy to share his answers with you here.
</p
>
154 <p
><strong
>Who are you, and how do you spend your days?
</strong
></p
>
156 <p
>I
'm a
44 year old country guy that have been working
12 years at
157 the same school as
50% IT-manager and
50% Teacher. My educational
158 background is fil.kand in history and religious beliefs, an exam as a
159 "folkhighschool
" teacher, that is, for teaching grownups. In
160 Norwegian I believe it
's called
"Vuxenupplaring
". I also have a master
161 in
"Technology and social change
". So I
'm not really a tech guy, I
162 just like to study how humans and technology interact and that is my
163 perspective when working with IT.
</p
>
165 <p
><strong
>How did you get in contact with the Skolelinux/Debian Edu
166 project?
</strong
></p
>
168 I have followed the Skolelinux project for quite some time by
169 now. Earlier I tested out the K12-LTSP project, which we used for some
170 time, but I really like the idea of having a distribution aimed to be
171 a complete solution for schools with necessary tools integrated. When
172 K12-LTSP abandoned that idea some years ago, I started to look more
173 seriously into Skolelinux instead.
175 <p
><strong
>What do you see as the advantages of Skolelinux/Debian
176 Edu?
</strong
></p
>
178 The big point of Skolelinux to me is that it is a complete
179 distribution, ready to install. It has LDAP-support, MS Windows
180 integration tools and so forth already configured, saving an
181 administrator a lot of time and headache. We were using another Linux
182 based thin-client system called Thinlinc, that has served us very
183 well. But that Skolelinux is based on VNC and LTSP, to me, is better
184 when it comes to the kind of multimedia used in schools. That is
185 showing videos from Youtube or educational TV. It is also easier to
186 mix thin clients with workstations, since the user settings will be the
187 same. In our VNC-based solution you had to
"beat around the bush
" by
188 setting up a second, hidden, home-directory for user settings for the
189 workstations, because they will be different from the ones used on the
190 thin clients. Skolelinux support for diskless workstations are very
191 convenient since a school today often need to use a class room
192 projector showing videos in full screen. That is easily done with a
193 small integrated media computer running as a diskless workstation. You
194 have only two installs to update and configure. One for the thin
195 clients and one for the workstations. Also saving a lot of time. Our
196 old system was also based on Redhat and CentOS. They are both very
197 nice distributions, but they are sometimes painfully slow when it
198 comes to updating multimedia support and multimedia programs (even
199 such as Gimp), leaving us with a bit
"oldish
" applications. Debian is
202 <p
><strong
>What do you see as the disadvantages of Skolelinux/Debian
203 Edu?
</strong
></p
>
205 <p
>Debian is a bit too quick when it comes to updating. As an example
206 we use old HP terminals as thinclients, and two times already this
207 year (
2012) the updates you get from the repositories has stopped
208 sound from working with them. It
's a kernel/ALSA issue. So you have
209 to be more careful properly testing the updates before you run them in
210 a production environment. This has never happened with CentOS.
</p
>
212 <p
>I also would like to be able to set my own domain-settings at
213 install time. In Skolelinux they are kind of hard coded into the
214 distribution, when it comes to LDAP and at least samba integration.
215 That is more a cosmetic/translation issue, and not a real problem.
216 Running MS Windows applications within the Skolelinux environment needs
217 to be better supported. That is, running them seamlessly via RDP, and
218 support for single-sign on. That will make the transition to free
219 software easier, because you can keep the applications you really
220 need. No support will make it impossible if you work in a school where
221 some applications can
't be open source. As for us we really need to
222 run Adobe InDesign in our journalist classes. We run a journalist
223 education, and is one of the very few non university ones that is ok:d
224 by Svenska journalistförbundet (Swedish journalist association). Our
225 education gives the pupils the right of membership there, once they
226 are done. This is important if you want to get a job.
</p
>
228 <p
>Adobe InDesign is the program most commonly used in newspapers and
229 magazines. We used Quark Express before, but they seem to loose there
230 market to Adobe. The only
"equivalent
" to InDesign in the opensource
231 world is Scribus, and its not advanced enough. At least not according
232 to the teacher. I think it would be possible to use it, because they
233 are not supposed to learn a program, they are supposed to learn how to
234 edit and compile a newspaper. But politically at our school we are not
235 there yet. And Scribus lacks a lot of things you find i InDesign.
</p
>
237 <p
>We used even a windows program for sound editing when it comes to
238 the radio-journalist part. The year to come we are going to try
239 Audacity. That software has the same kind of limitations compared to
240 Adobe Audition, but that teacher is a bit more open minded. We have
241 tried Ardour also, but that instead is more like a music studio
242 program, not intended for the kind of editing taking place in a radio
243 studio. Its way to complex and the GUI is to scattered when you only
244 want to cut, make pass-overs, add extra channels and normalise. Those
245 things you can do in Audacity, but its not as easy as in Audition. You
246 have to do more things manually with envelopes, and that is a bit old
247 fashion and timewasting. Its also harder to cut and move sound from
248 one channel to another, which is a thing that you do frequently
249 because you often find yourself needing to rearrange parts of the
250 sound file.
</p
>
252 <p
>So, I am not sure we will succeed in replacing even Audition, but we
253 will try. The problem is the students have certain expectations when
254 they start an education towards a profession. So the programs has to
255 look and feel professional. Good thing with radio, there are many
256 programs out there, that radio studios use, so its not as standardised
257 as Newspaper editing. That means, it does not really matter what
258 program they learn, because once they start working they still have to
259 learn the program the studio uses, so instead focus has to be to learn
260 the editing part without to much focus on a specific software.
</p
>
262 <p
><strong
>Which free software do you use daily?
</strong
></p
>
264 <p
>Myself I
'm running Linux Mint, or Ubuntu these days. I use almost
265 only open source software, and preferably Linux based. When it comes
266 to most used applications its OpenOffice, and Firefox (of course ;)
269 <p
><strong
>Which strategy do you believe is the right one to use to
270 get schools to use free software?
</strong
></p
>
272 <p
>To get schools to use free software there has to be good open
273 source software that are windows based, to ease the transition. But
274 it
's also very important that the multimedia support is working
275 flawlessly. The problems with Youtube, Twitter, Facebook and whatever
276 will create problems when it comes to both teachers and
277 students. Economy are also important for schools, so using thin
278 clients, as long as they have good multimedia support, is a very good
279 idea. It
's also important that the open source software works even for
280 the administration. It
's hard to convince the teachers to stick with
281 open source, if the principal has to run Windows. It also creates a
282 problem if some classes has to use Windows for there tasks, since that
283 will create a difference in
"status
" between classes, so a good
284 support for running windows applications via the thin client (Linux)
285 desktop is essential. At least at our school, where we have mixed
286 level of educations, from high-school to journalist-school.
</p
>
288 <p
>Update
2012-
07-
09 08:
30: Paul Wise tipped me on IRC about three
289 useful sources related to Free Software for radio stations: the LWN
290 article
<a href=
"https://lwn.net/Articles/
481607/
">Radio station
291 management with Airtime
</a
>,
292 <a href=
"http://www.sourcefabric.org/en/airtime/
">Airtime
</a
> which
293 claim to be a Free open source radio automation software and
294 <a href=
"http://www.rivendellaudio.org/
">Rivendell
</a
> which claim to
295 be complete radio broadcast automation solution. All of them seem
296 useful to the aspiring radio producer.
</p
>
301 <title>Why do schools waste money on IT?
</title>
302 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Why_do_schools_waste_money_on_IT_.html
</link>
303 <guid isPermaLink=
"true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Why_do_schools_waste_money_on_IT_.html
</guid>
304 <pubDate>Sun,
8 Jul
2012 09:
40:
00 +
0200</pubDate>
305 <description><p
>In the Debian Edu / Skolelinux project, we have realised that one
306 of the major blockers for the project success is the purchasing skills
307 in schools and municipalities. We provide what the happy users of
308 Debian Edu / Skolelinux say they need and to a lower cost than the
309 alternatives, and yet so few schools decide to use our solution. I
310 was pleased to discover the same observation done by mySociety and Tom
311 Steinberg in his blog post
312 "<a href=
"http://www.mysociety.org/
2012/
06/
19/can-you-recognize-the-million-pound-chair/
">Can
313 you recognize the million pound chair?
</a
>". Read it and weep for the
314 spending of your tax money.
</p
>
316 <p
>Of course there are other factors involved as well, like our
317 projects bad marketing skills and the Linux community fragmentation
318 causing worry with the people on the outside, so we as a project need
319 to keep working hard to gain users, but it is a up-hill battle when
320 public decision makers are unable to understand computer system
326 <title>Free Timetabling Software - nice free software
</title>
327 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Free_Timetabling_Software___nice_free_software.html
</link>
328 <guid isPermaLink=
"true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Free_Timetabling_Software___nice_free_software.html
</guid>
329 <pubDate>Sat,
7 Jul
2012 09:
50:
00 +
0200</pubDate>
330 <description><p
>Included in
<a href=
"http://www.skolelinux.org/
">Debian Edu /
331 Skolelinux
</a
> is a large collection of end user and school specific
332 software. It is one of the packages not installed by default but
333 provided in the Debian archive for schools to install if they want to,
334 is a system to automatically plan the school time table using
335 information about available teachers, classes and rooms, combined with
336 the list of required courses and how many hours each topic should
337 receive. The software is
339 <a href=
"http://lalescu.ro/liviu/fet/
">named FET
</a
>, and it provide a
340 graphical user interface to input the required information, save the
341 result in a fairly simple XML format, and generate time tables for
342 both teachers and students. It is available both for
343 <a href=
"http://lalescu.ro/liviu/fet/download.html
">Linux, MacOSX and
344 Windows
</a
>.
</p
>
346 <p
>This is
<a href=
"http://lalescu.ro/liviu/fet/features.html
">the
347 feature list
</a
>, liftet from the project web site:
</p
>
351 <li
>FET is free software, licensed under the GNU GPL v2 or later.
352 You can freely use, copy, modify and redistribute it
</li
>
354 <li
>Localized to en_US (US English, default), ar (Arabic), ca
355 (Catalan), da (Danish), de (German), el (Greek), es (Spanish), fa
356 (Persian), fr (French), gl (Galician), he (Hebrew), hu
357 (Hungarian), id (Indonesian), it (Italian), lt (Lithuanian), mk
358 (Macedonian), ms (Malay), nl (Dutch), pl (Polish), pt_BR
359 (Brazilian Portuguese), ro (Romanian), ru (Russian), si (Sinhala),
360 sk (Slovak), sr (Serbian), tr (Turkish), uk (Ukrainian), uz
361 (Uzbek) and vi (Vietnamese) (incompletely for some languages)
364 <li
>Fully automatic generation algorithm, allowing also
365 semi-automatic or manual allocation
</li
>
367 <li
>Platform independent implementation, allowing running on
368 GNU/Linux, Windows, Mac and any system that Qt supports
</li
>
370 <li
>Flexible modular XML format for the input file, allowing editing
371 with an XML editor or by hand (besides FET interface)
</li
>
373 <li
>Import/export from CSV format
</li
>
375 <li
>The resulted timetables are exported into HTML, XML and CSV
378 <li
>Flexible students structure, organized into sets: years, groups
379 and subgroups. FET allows overlapping years and groups and
380 non-overlapping subgroups. You can even define individual students
381 (as separate sets)
</li
>
383 <li
>Each constraint has a weight percentage, from
0.0% to
100.0%
384 (but some special constraints are allowed to have only
100% weight
385 percentage)
</li
>
387 <li
>Limits for the algorithm (all these limits can be increased on
388 demand, as a custom version, because this would require a bit more
391 <li
>Maximum total number of hours (periods) per day:
60</li
>
392 <li
>Maximum number of working days per week:
35</li
>
393 <li
>Maximum total number of teachers:
6000</li
>
394 <li
>Maximum total number of sets of students:
30000</li
>
395 <li
>Maximum total number of subjects:
6000</li
>
396 <li
>Virtually unlimited number of activity tags
</li
>
397 <li
>Maximum number of activities:
30000</li
>
398 <li
>Maximum number of rooms:
6000</li
>
399 <li
>Maximum number of buildings:
6000</li
>
400 <li
>Possibility of adding multiple teachers and
401 students sets for each activity. (it is possible
402 also to have no teachers or no students sets for an
404 <li
>Virtually unlimited number of time constraints
</li
>
405 <li
>Virtually unlimited number of space constraints
</li
>
406 </ul
></li
>
408 <li
>A large and flexible palette of time constraints:
410 <li
>Break periods
</li
>
411 <li
>For teacher(s):
413 <li
>Not available periods
</li
>
414 <li
>Max/min days per week
</li
>
415 <li
>Max gaps per day/week
</li
>
416 <li
>Max hours daily/continuously
</li
>
417 <li
>Min hours daily
</li
>
418 <li
>Max hours daily/continuously with an activity tag
</li
>
420 <li
>Respect working in an hourly interval a max number of
421 days per week
</li
>
422 </ul
></li
>
423 <li
>For students (sets):
425 <li
>Not available periods
</li
>
426 <li
>Begins early (specify max allowed beginnings at second hour)
</li
>
427 <li
>Max gaps per day/week
</li
>
428 <li
>Max hours daily/continuously
</li
>
429 <li
>Min hours daily
</li
>
430 <li
>Max hours daily/continuously with an activity tag
</li
>
432 <li
>Respect working in an hourly interval a max number of
433 days per week
</li
>
434 </ul
></li
>
435 <li
>For an activity or a set of activities/subactivities:
437 <li
>A single preferred starting time
</li
>
438 <li
>A set of preferred starting times
</li
>
439 <li
>A set of preferred time slots
</li
>
440 <li
>Min/max days between them
</li
>
441 <li
>End(s) students day
</li
>
442 <li
>Same starting time/day/hour
</li
>
443 <li
>Occupy max time slots from selection (a complex and
444 flexible constraint, useful in many situations)
</li
>
445 <li
>Consecutive, ordered, grouped (for
2 or
3 (sub)activities)
</li
>
446 <li
>Not overlapping
</li
>
447 <li
>Max simultaneous in selected time slots
</li
>
448 <li
>Min gaps between a set of (sub)activities
</li
>
449 </ul
></li
>
450 </ul
></li
>
452 <li
>A large and flexible palette of space constraints:
454 <li
>Room not available periods
</li
>
455 <li
>For teacher(s):
457 <li
>Home room(s)
</li
>
458 <li
>Max building changes per day/week
</li
>
459 <li
>Min gaps between building changes
</li
>
463 <li
>For students (sets):
465 <li
>Home room(s)
</li
>
466 <li
>Max building changes per day/week
</li
>
467 <li
>Min gaps between building changes
</li
>
470 <li
>Preferred room(s):
472 <li
>For a subject
</li
>
473 <li
>For an activity tag
</li
>
474 <li
>For a subject and an activity tag
</li
>
475 <li
>Individually for a (sub)activity
</li
>
479 <li
>For a set of activities:
481 <li
>Occupy a maximum number of different rooms
</li
>
486 </ul
></p
>
488 <p
>I have not used it myself, as I am not involved in time table
489 planning at a school, but it seem to work fine when I test it. If you
490 need to set up your schools time table, and is tired of doing it
491 manually, check it out.
493 A quick summary on how to use it can be found in
494 <a href=
"http://marvelsoft.co.in/wp/
2012/
03/generate-timetable-for-state-cbse-icse-igcse-schools-free/
">a
495 blog post from MarvelSoft
</a
>. If you find FET useful, please provide
496 a recipe for the Debian Edu project in the
497 <a href=
"http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu#Howtos
">Debian Edu HowTo
498 section
</a
>.
</p
>
503 <title>Mer oppfølging fra MPEG-LA om avtale med dem for å kringkaste og publisere H
.264-video
</title>
504 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Mer_oppf_lging_fra_MPEG_LA_om_avtale_med_dem_for___kringkaste_og_publisere_H_264_video.html
</link>
505 <guid isPermaLink=
"true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Mer_oppf_lging_fra_MPEG_LA_om_avtale_med_dem_for___kringkaste_og_publisere_H_264_video.html
</guid>
506 <pubDate>Thu,
5 Jul
2012 23:
50:
00 +
0200</pubDate>
507 <description><p
>I føljetongen om H
.264
508 <a href=
"http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/MPEG_LA_mener_NRK_m__ha_avtale_med_dem_for___kringkaste_og_publisere_H_264_video.html
">forlot
509 jeg leserne i undring
</a
> om hvor pakken fra MPEG-LA tok veien, og om
510 hvilke selskaper i Norge som har avtale med MPEG-LA. Da Ryan hos
511 MPEG-LA dro på ferie sendte jeg min melding videre til hans kollega,
512 og dagen etter fikk jeg følgende svar derfra:
</p
>
514 <p
><blockquote
>
515 <p
>Date: Fri,
29 Jun
2012 18:
32:
34 +
0000
516 <br
>From: Sidney Wolf
&lt;SWolf (at) mpegla.com
&gt;
517 <br
>To: Petter Reinholdtsen
&lt;pere (at) hungry.com
&gt;
518 <br
>Cc: Ryan Rodriguez
&lt;RRodriguez (at) mpegla.com
&gt;
519 <br
>Subject: RE: Do NRK have a license agreement with MPEG-LA?
</p
>
521 <p
>Dear Mr. Reinholdtsen,
</p
>
523 <p
>Thank you for your message. As you know, Ryan is currently our of the
524 office, so it will be my pleasure to assist you.
</p
>
526 <p
>Per your request, attached please find an electronic copy of the
527 AVC Patent Portfolio License. Please note that the electronic copy of
528 the License is provided as a convenience and for informational
529 purposes only. When concluding the Licenses, only the hard copies
530 provided by MPEG LA may be used.
</p
>
532 <p
>To your question, MPEG LA lists our Licensees on our website
533 according to each program. The lists are in alphabetical order, so it
534 is very easy to search.
</p
>
536 <p
>I hope that this was helpful. If we can be of additional
537 assistance, please let me know.
</p
>
539 <p
>Kind regards,
</p
>
541 <p
>Sidney A. Wolf
542 <br
>Manager, Global Licensing
543 <br
>MPEG LA
</p
>
544 </blockquote
></p
>
546 <p
>Selv om et epostvedlegg er nyttig for mottakeren, så håpet jeg å få
547 et dokument jeg kunne dele med alle leserne av bloggen min, og ikke et
548 som må deles på individuell basis. Opphavsretten krever godkjenning
549 fra rettighetsinnehaver før en kan gjøre slikt, så dermed fulgte jeg
550 opp med et spørsmål om dette var greit.
</p
>
552 <p
><blockquote
>
553 <p
>Date: Wed,
4 Jul
2012 20:
25:
06 +
0200
554 <br
>From: Petter Reinholdtsen
&lt;pere (at) hungry.com
&gt;
555 <br
>To: Sidney Wolf
&lt;SWolf (at) mpegla.com
&gt;
556 <br
>Cc: Ryan Rodriguez
&lt;RRodriguez (at) mpegla.com
&gt;
557 <br
>Subject: Re: Do NRK have a license agreement with MPEG-LA?
</p
>
559 <p
>Thank you for your reply.
</p
>
561 <p
>[Sidney Wolf]
562 <br
>&gt; Per your request, attached please find an electronic copy of the AVC
563 <br
>&gt; Patent Portfolio License. Please note that the electronic copy of
564 <br
>&gt; the License is provided as a convenience and for informational
565 <br
>&gt; purposes only. When concluding the Licenses, only the hard copies
566 <br
>&gt; provided by MPEG LA may be used.
</p
>
568 <p
>This is useful for me to learn, but the reason I asked for the
569 Internet address of the licensing document was to ensure I could
570 publish a link to it when I discuss the topic of H
.264 licensing here
571 in Norway, and allow others to verify my observations. I can not do
572 the same with an email attachment. Thus I would like to ask you if it
573 is OK with MPEG LA that I publish this document on the Internet for
574 others to read?
</p
>
576 <p
>&gt; To your question, MPEG LA lists our Licensees on our website
577 <br
>&gt; according to each program. The lists are in alphabetical order, so
578 <br
>&gt; it is very easy to search.
</p
>
580 <p
>I am afraid this do not help me locate Norwegian companies in the
581 list of Licensees. I do not know the name of all companies and
582 organisations in Norway, and thus do not know how to locate the
583 Norwegian ones on that list.
</p
>
585 <p
>&gt; I hope that this was helpful. If we can be of additional assistance,
586 <br
>&gt; please let me know.
</p
>
588 <p
>Absoutely helpful to learn more about how MPEG LA handle licensing.
</p
>
591 <br
>Happy hacking
592 <br
>Petter Reinholdtsen
</p
>
593 </blockquote
></p
>
595 <p
>Jeg håpet også at det skulle være mulig å få vite hvilke av de
596 mange hundre som har avtale med MPEG-LA om bruk av H
.264 som holdt til
597 i Norge. Begge mine håp falt i grus med svaret fra MPEG-LA.
599 <p
><blockquote
>
600 <p
>Date: Thu,
5 Jul
2012 17:
42:
39 +
0000
601 <br
>From: Sidney Wolf
&lt;SWolf (at) mpegla.com
&gt;
602 <br
>To:
'Petter Reinholdtsen
' &lt;pere (at) hungry.com
&gt;
603 <br
>Cc: Ryan Rodriguez
&lt;RRodriguez (at) mpegla.com
&gt;
604 <br
>Subject: RE: Do NRK have a license agreement with MPEG-LA?
</p
>
606 <p
>Dear Mr. Reinholdtsen,
</p
>
608 <p
>Thank you for your reply.
</p
>
610 <p
>We appreciate the additional explanation you have provided and for
611 asking our permission to publish the electronic copy of the License in
612 advance of doing so. Typically, MPEG LA prefers to distribute the
613 electronic copies of our Licenses to interested parties. Therefore,
614 please feel free to send interested parties to the AVC portion of our
615 website, http://www.mpegla.com/main/programs/AVC/Pages/Intro.aspx for
616 their further reference.
</p
>
618 <p
>As previously mentioned, MPEG LA maintains a list of Licensees in good
619 standing on our website according to each program. Due to the large
620 volume of Licensees, it would be administratively impractical to
621 provide this level of detail to interested parties. Therefore, I am
622 afraid we are not in a position to assist you with your request.
</p
>
624 <p
>Kind regards,
</p
>
626 <p
>Sidney A. Wolf
627 <br
>Manager, Global Licensing
628 <br
>MPEG LA
</p
>
629 </blockquote
></p
>
631 <p
>Men takket være epostvedlegget kunne jeg søke på Google etter
632 setningen
"WHEREAS, a video standard commonly referred to as AVC has
633 been defined and is referred to in this Agreement as the “AVC
634 Standard” (as more fully defined herein below)
" som finnes i avtalen,
635 og lokalisere en kopi fra
2007 av
636 <a href=
"http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/
1342960/
000119312509050004/dex1024.htm
">lisensavtalen
637 mellom MPEG-LA og DivX, Inc.
</a
>, slik at mine lesere kan se hvordan
638 avtalen så ut da. Jeg har ikke sammenlignet tekstene for å se om noe
639 har endret seg siden den tid, men satser på at teksten er representativ.
</p
>
641 <p
>Jeg aner fortsatt ikke hvor FedEx tok veien med pakken fra
644 <p
>Update
2012-
07-
06: Jeg er visst ikke den første som forsøker å få
645 klarhet i problemstillinger rundt H
.264, og kom nettopp over en veldig
646 interessant bloggpost fra
2010 hos LibreVideo med tittelen
647 "<a href=
"http://www.librevideo.org/blog/
2010/
06/
14/mpeg-la-answers-some-questions-about-avch-
264-licensing/
">MPEG-LA
648 answers some questions about AVC/H
.264 licensing
</a
>. Anbefales!
</p
>
653 <title>Hvorfor leverer noen sent til Offentlig Elektronisk postjournal?
</title>
654 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Hvorfor_leverer_noen_sent_til_Offentlig_Elektronisk_postjournal_.html
</link>
655 <guid isPermaLink=
"true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Hvorfor_leverer_noen_sent_til_Offentlig_Elektronisk_postjournal_.html
</guid>
656 <pubDate>Thu,
5 Jul
2012 10:
40:
00 +
0200</pubDate>
657 <description><p
>I forbindelse med NUUG-prosjektet for å
658 <a href=
"http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Postjournaler_i_det_offentlige___vanskelig_med_vilje_.html
">lage
659 en samlet postjournal
</a
>, har jeg som tidligere nevnt
660 <a href=
"https://scraperwiki.com/scrapers/postliste-oep-deliverydates/
">samlet
661 inn leveringstidspunkt
</a
> for de ulike leverandørene av postjournaler
662 til DIFIs
<a href=
"http://www.oep.no/
">Offentlig Elektronisk
663 Postjournal
</a
>.
664 <a href=
"https://api.scraperwiki.com/api/
1.0/datastore/sqlite?format=htmltable
&name=postliste-oep-deliverydates
&query=select%
20agency%
2C%
0A(julianday(datetime(
'now
'))%
20-%
20%
0A%
20julianday(min(%
60deliverydate%
60)))%
2Fcount(*)%
20as%
20dayfreq%
2C%
0A%
20count(*),max(deliverydate)%
20as%
20lastdelivery%
0Afrom%
20%
60swdata%
60%
20group%
20by%
20agency%
20order%
20by%
20dayfreq%
20desc
">Leveringsfrekvensen
</a
>
665 ser i dag slik ut for de som har brukt mer enn
10 dager i snitt siden
666 jeg startet innsamling av leveringsdato
2012-
05-
14</p
>
668 <table border=
"1">
669 <tr
> <th
>agency
</th
> <th
>dayfreq
</th
> <th
>count(*)
</th
> <th
>lastdelivery
</th
> </tr
>
670 <tr
> <td
>Norges geologiske undersøkelse
</td
> <td
>27.0866579862</td
> <td
>4</td
> <td
>2012-
07-
02T00:
00:
00</td
> </tr
>
671 <tr
> <td
>Kompetansesenter for distriktsutvikling
</td
> <td
>18.4488773149</td
> <td
>3</td
> <td
>2012-
06-
20T00:
00:
00</td
> </tr
>
672 <tr
> <td
>Toll- og avgiftsdirektoratet
</td
> <td
>18.4488773149</td
> <td
>3</td
> <td
>2012-
07-
04T00:
00:
00</td
> </tr
>
673 <tr
> <td
>Departementenes servicesenter
</td
> <td
>18.0866579862</td
> <td
>4</td
> <td
>2012-
06-
29T00:
00:
00</td
> </tr
>
674 <tr
> <td
>Medietilsynet
</td
> <td
>14.5866579862</td
> <td
>4</td
> <td
>2012-
07-
04T00:
00:
00</td
> </tr
>
675 <tr
> <td
>Politidirektoratet
</td
> <td
>14.3366579862</td
> <td
>4</td
> <td
>2012-
06-
20T00:
00:
00</td
> </tr
>
676 <tr
> <td
>Fredskorpset
</td
> <td
>12.4693263889</td
> <td
>5</td
> <td
>2012-
06-
22T00:
00:
00</td
> </tr
>
677 <tr
> <td
>Kunnskapsdepartementet
</td
> <td
>11.2693263889</td
> <td
>5</td
> <td
>2012-
07-
05T00:
00:
00</td
> </tr
>
678 <tr
> <td
>Statens legemiddelverk
</td
> <td
>10.4780902778</td
> <td
>7</td
> <td
>2012-
06-
29T00:
00:
00</td
> </tr
>
679 <tr
> <td
>Norsk Akkreditering
</td
> <td
>10.4488773149</td
> <td
>3</td
> <td
>2012-
07-
02T00:
00:
00</td
> </tr
>
682 <p
>Basert på innsamlet leveringsfrekvens har jeg så sendt spørsmål til
683 den offisielle epostadressen til de som har lavest leveringsfrekvens,
684 og spurt dem hva som skjer. Her er svarene jeg har fått så langt, som
685 et knippe forklaringer til hvorfor det kan gå lang tid før offentlige
686 postjournaler blir tilgjengelig for innbyggerne og pressen.
</p
>
688 <p
><strong
>Norges geologiske undersøkelse
</strong
></p
>
690 <p
><blockquote
>
691 <p
>Subject: Hvor ofte leverer Norges geologiske undersøkelse til Offentlig Elektronisk postjournal?
692 <br
>Date: Fri,
08 Jun
2012 09:
20:
57 +
0200</p
>
694 <p
>Hei. Jeg har et lite spørsmål til dere. Fra statistikken til Offentlig
695 Eletronisk Postjournal (OEP) ser jeg det er lenge siden NGU leverte
696 postjournalen sin sist. Hvor ofte pleier NGU å levere til Offentlig
697 Eletronisk Postjournal? Er dere fornøyd med dagens leveringfrekvens?
</p
>
701 <p
>Subject: SV: Hvor ofte leverer Norges geologiske undersøkelse til Offentlig Elektronisk postjournal?
702 <br
>Date: Fri,
8 Jun
2012 12:
49:
35 +
0200</p
>
704 <p
>Hei
</p
>
706 <p
>NGUS fravær på OEP skyldes problemer vi har i forbindelse med
707 oppgradering til ny versjon i vårt arkivsystem. Det jobbes med saken
708 og jeg tror og håper at det snart skal være i orden. Normalt leverer
709 vi til OEP
1 gang i uken.
</p
>
710 </blockquote
></p
>
712 <p
><strong
>Medietilsynet
</strong
></p
>
713 <p
><blockquote
>
714 <p
>Subject: Hvor ofte leverer Medietilsynet til Offentlig Elektronisk postjournal?
715 <br
>Date: Mon,
11 Jun
2012 13:
29:
23 +
0200</p
>
717 <p
>Hei. Jeg har et lite spørsmål til dere. Fra statistikken til Offentlig
718 Eletronisk Postjournal (OEP) ser jeg det er lenge siden Medietilsynet
719 leverte postjournalen sin sist. Hvor ofte pleier Medietilsynet å levere
720 til Offentlig Eletronisk Postjournal? Er dere fornøyd med dagens
721 leveringfrekvens?
</p
>
724 <p
>Subject: SV: Hvor ofte leverer Medietilsynet til Offentlig Elektronisk postjournal?
725 <br
>Date: Tue,
12 Jun
2012 04:
55:
42 +
0000</p
>
727 <p
>Hei!
</p
>
729 <p
>Medietilsynet leverer normalt postlister en gang i uka. Nå har vi
730 tekniske problemer, derfor er vi forsinket. Vi regner med å levere i
731 løpet av denne uken. Ellers er vi fornøyd med dagens
732 leveringsfrekvens.
</p
>
733 </blockquote
></p
>
735 <p
><strong
>Kunnskapsdepartementet
</strong
></p
>
736 <p
><blockquote
>
737 <p
>Subject: Hvor ofte leverer Kunnskapsdepartementet til Offentlig Elektronisk Postjournal?
738 <br
>Date: Fri,
22 Jun
2012 21:
03:
01 +
0200</p
>
740 <p
>Hei. Jeg har et lite spørsmål til dere. Fra statistikken til Offentlig
741 Eletronisk Postjournal (OEP) ser jeg at Kunnskapsdepartementet har levert
742 postjournalen sin to ganger siden
2012-
05-
10, og sist
2012-
05-
16. Hvor
743 ofte pleier Kunnskapsdepartementet å levere til Offentlig Eletronisk
744 Postjournal? Er dere fornøyd med dagens leveringfrekvens?
</p
>
748 <p
>Subject: Re: Hvor ofte leverer Kunnskapsdepartementet til Offentlig Elektronisk Postjournal?
749 <br
>Date: Wed,
27 Jun
2012 14:
42:
23 +
0200</p
>
751 <p
>Hei. Kom denne eposten frem? Har ikke sett noe svar, og andre
752 institusjoner jeg har spurt om tilsvarende har svart i løpet av under en
753 dag på tilsvarende spørsmål, så jeg begynner å lurer på om meldingen
756 <p
>[... kopi av opprinnelig epost ...]
</p
>
759 <p
>Subject: Re: VS: Hvor ofte leverer Kunnskapsdepartementet til Offentlig Elektronisk Postjournal?
760 <br
>Date: Wed,
27 Jun
2012 14:
33:
20 +
0000</p
>
762 <p
>Hei!
</p
>
764 <p
>Normalt leverer vi hver virkedag til OEP, med fem virkedagers
765 forsinkelse. Kunnskapsdepartementet har imidlertid ikke kunnet levere
766 OEP pga innføringen av nytt saksbehandlingssystem
7. Mai. Den
767 etterfølgende streiken medførte så et større etterslep på
768 journalføring som har gjort at vi har måttet prioritere dette fremfor
769 offentlig journal. Dette arbeidet har av flere sammenfallende årsaker
770 tatt noe tid. Vi håper imidlertid på at vi kan begynne å publisere
771 offentlig journal igjen i løpet av denne uken, senest neste uke. Vi
772 gjenopptar da vår vanlige publiseringsfrekvens i tillegg til å få på
773 plass de manglende journalene.
</p
>
775 </blockquote
></p
>
778 <p
><strong
>Norsk Akkreditering
</strong
></p
>
779 <p
><blockquote
>
780 <p
>Subject: Hvor ofte leverer Norsk Akkreditering til Offentlig Elektronisk postjournal?
781 <br
>Date: Thu,
28 Jun
2012 07:
35:
43 +
0200</p
>
783 <p
>Hei. Jeg har et lite spørsmål til dere. Fra statistikken til
784 Offentlig Eletronisk Postjournal (OEP) ser jeg det går lenge hver gang
785 Norsk Akkreditering leverer postjournalen sin. Hvor ofte pleier Norsk
786 Akkreditering å levere til Offentlig Eletronisk Postjournal? Er dere
787 fornøyd med dagens leveringfrekvens?
</p
>
791 <p
>Subject: SV: Hvor ofte leverer Norsk Akkreditering til Offentlig Elektronisk postjournal?
792 <br
>Date: Mon,
2 Jul
2012 08:
32:
06 +
0200</p
>
794 <p
>Hei,
</p
>
796 <p
>Norsk Akkreditering har som ambisjon å levere til OEP
2 ganger i
797 uken. Pga sykdom har dette vært vanskelig å gjennomføre i juni.
</p
>
798 </blockquote
></p
>
800 <p
><strong
>Toll- og avgiftsdirektoratet
</strong
></p
>
801 <p
><blockquote
>
802 <p
>Date: Tue,
03 Jul
2012 11:
55:
07 +
0200
803 <br
>Subject: Hvor ofte leverer Toll- og avgiftsdirektoratet til Offentlig Elektronisk postjournal?
</p
>
806 <p
>Hei. Jeg har et lite spørsmål til dere. Fra statistikken til
807 Offentlig Eletronisk Postjournal (OEP) ser jeg det går lenge hver gang
808 Toll- og avgiftsdirektoratet leverer postjournalen sin til OEP, og at
809 siste levering var
2012-
06-
06. Hvor ofte pleier Toll- og
810 avgiftsdirektoratet å levere til OEP? Er dere fornøyd med dagens
811 leveringfrekvens?
</p
>
815 <p
>Date: Wed,
4 Jul
2012 09:
33:
18 +
0000
816 <br
>Subject: SV: Hvor ofte leverer Toll- og avgiftsdirektoratet til Offentlig Elektronisk postjournal?
</p
>
818 <p
>Til: Petter Reinholdtsen
</p
>
820 <p
>Det vises til din e-post av
3. juli
2012.
</p
>
822 <p
>Våre rutiner tilsier at vår journal skal publiseres en gang pr. uke
823 (hver torsdag). Vi søker så langt det er mulig å få dette til og har
824 stort sett publisert iht rutinene siden vi kom opp på OEP.
</p
>
826 <p
>Pga ekstraordinære forhold ved vårt arkiv har vi i de siste ukene
827 ikke hatt kapasitet til å opprettholde den publiseringsfrekvensen vi
828 har fastsatt. Det er et begrenset antall medarbeidere som kan og skal
829 kunne publisere våre journaler. Vi håper imidlertid at dette raskt vil
830 bedres og vi er tilbake til den frekvens vi har satt oss som mål å ha.
</p
>
832 <p
>Vi beklager hvis dette har skapt vanskeligheter.
</p
>
833 </blockquote
></p
>
835 <p
>Like etter at jeg fikk svar ble OEP oppdatert med postjournaler fra
836 alle disse etatene. Antagelig tilfeldig, men jeg ser ikke bort fra at
837 det kan ha virket motiverende for å få på plass leveringen at de ser
838 at det er interesse for leveringen til OEP.
</p
>
843 <title>Medietilsynets syn på om Frikanalen bør være ukryptert på det digitale bakkenettet
</title>
844 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Medietilsynets_syn_p__om_Frikanalen_b_r_v_re_ukryptert_p__det_digitale_bakkenettet.html
</link>
845 <guid isPermaLink=
"true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Medietilsynets_syn_p__om_Frikanalen_b_r_v_re_ukryptert_p__det_digitale_bakkenettet.html
</guid>
846 <pubDate>Wed,
4 Jul
2012 14:
20:
00 +
0200</pubDate>
847 <description>I forgårs fikk jeg endelig svar fra Medietilsynet på min epost med
848 spørmål om hvorfor
<a href=
"http://www.frikanalen.no/
">Frikanalen
</a
>
849 er kryptert på RiksTV. De toer sine hender:
851 <p
><blockquote
>
852 <p
>Date: Mon,
2 Jul
2012 08:
15:
38 +
0000
853 <br
>From: Arve Lindboe
&lt;Arve.Lindboe (at) medietilsynet.no
&gt;
854 <br
>To: Petter Reinholdtsen
855 <br
>CC: Arthur Garnes
&lt;Arthur.Garnes (at) rikstv.no
&gt;,
856 postmottak (at) sd.dep.no, post (at) frikanalen.no
857 <br
>Subject: Spørsmål om kryptering av Frikanalen i det digitale bakkenetttet for fjernsyn
</p
>
859 <p
>Vi viser til Deres spørsmål av
27. mai i år til RiksTV,
860 Samferdselsdepartementet og Medietilsynet, og til RiksTVs svar av
861 1. juli til Dem, som vi har mottatt i kopi.
</p
>
863 <p
>For ordens skyld vil vi orientere om at Medietilsynet har visse
864 tilsynsoppgaver knyttet til kapittel
3 i NTVs konsesjon for
865 opprettelse og drift av det digitale bakkenettet for fjernsyn. Av
866 pkt.
3.5 i denne konsesjonen går det bl.a. fram at NRKs
867 kjernetilbud/allmennkringkastingstilbud... «skal være tilgjengelig
868 uten betaling og ha lik dekning.» For distribusjon av innhold utenfor
869 NRKs tilbud er det ikke tatt inn noen tilsvarende forutsetning i
870 konsesjonen.
</p
>
872 <p
>Medietilsynets mandat omfatter ikke spørsmålet om kryptering og
873 administrasjon av engangsavgift knyttet til adgangskontrollsystem for
874 NTVs formidling, og tilsynet kan derfor ikke ta stilling til de
875 spørsmålene De reiser i tilknytning til det.
</p
>
877 <p
>Mvh
</p
>
879 <p
>Arve Lindboe
</p
>
882 <br
>Medietilsynet
</p
>
883 </blockquote
></p
>
885 <p
>Her må det tydeligvis andre aktører i sving for å bli kvitt
886 krypteringen av Frikanalen.
</p
>
891 <title>Can Zimbra be told to send autoreplies to the From: address?
</title>
892 <link>http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Can_Zimbra_be_told_to_send_autoreplies_to_the_From__address_.html
</link>
893 <guid isPermaLink=
"true">http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Can_Zimbra_be_told_to_send_autoreplies_to_the_From__address_.html
</guid>
894 <pubDate>Tue,
3 Jul
2012 23:
30:
00 +
0200</pubDate>
895 <description><p
>In the NUUG
<a href=
"http://www.fiksgatami.no/
">FiksGataMi
</a
>
896 project (Norwegian version of
897 <a href=
"http://www.fixmystreet.com/
">FixMyStreet
</a
> from
898 <a href=
"http://www.mysociety.org/
">mySociety
</a
>), we have discovered
899 a problem with the municipalities using
900 <a href=
"http://www.zimbra.com/
">Zimbra
</a
>. When FiksGataMi send a
901 problem report to the government, the email From: address is set to
902 the address of the person reporting the problem, while envelope sender
903 is set to the FiksGataMi contact address. The intention is to make
904 sure the municipality send any replies to the person reporting the
905 problem, while any email delivery problems are sent to us in NUUG.
906 This work well in most cases, but not for Karmøy municipality using
907 Zimbra. Karmøy is using the vacation message function in Zimbra to
908 send an automatic reply to report that the message has been received,
909 and this message is sent to the envelope sender and not the address in
910 the From: header.
</p
>
912 <p
>This causes the automatic message from Karmøy to go to NUUGs
913 request-tracker instance instead of to the person reporting the
914 problem. We can not really change the envelope sender address, as
915 this would make it impossible for us to discover when there are
916 problems with the MTAs receiving problem reports. We have been in
917 contact with the people at Karmøy municipality, and they are willing
918 to adjust Zimbra if something can be changed there to get a better
921 <p
>The default behaviour of Zimbra is as far as I can tell according
922 to the specification in RFC
3834, which recommend that vacation
923 messages are sent to the envelope sender and not to the From: address.
924 But I wonder if it is possible to adjust or configure Zimbra to behave
925 differently. Anyone know? Please let us know at
926 <a href=
"http://lists.nuug.no/mailman/listinfo/fiksgatami
">fiksgatami
927 (at) nuug.no
</a
>.
</p
>
projects / homepage.git / blob