Generated.

diff --git a/blog/Speeding_up_the_Debian_installer_using_eatmydata_and_dpkg_divert.html b/blog/Speeding_up_the_Debian_installer_using_eatmydata_and_dpkg_divert.html
index 1463b0df0c222c60e3167f8fcdc609fcac204b24..251054c75c0823a461253e49321f6fc35f6bf52c 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/Speeding_up_the_Debian_installer_using_eatmydata_and_dpkg_divert.html
+++ b/blog/Speeding_up_the_Debian_installer_using_eatmydata_and_dpkg_divert.html
@@ -219,6 +219,11 @@ Perhaps there is some package in Debian depending on sync() and
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>

+
+<p>Update 2014-09-24: Since a few days ago, enabling this optimization
+will break installation of all programs using gnutls because of
+<ahref="https://bugs.debian.org/702711">bug #702711.  An updated
+eatmydata package in Debian will solve it.</p>

 </div>
       
       <div class="tags">Tags: <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/debian">debian</a>, <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/debian edu">debian edu</a>, <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/english">english</a>.</div>
 </div>
       
       <div class="tags">Tags: <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/debian">debian</a>, <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/debian edu">debian edu</a>, <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/tags/english">english</a>.</div>

diff --git a/blog/archive/2014/09/09.rss b/blog/archive/2014/09/09.rss
index ffdd2dcacdd599b558033390b00385bb9fa54f51..34dd219470b44f66dd72f5db005b2071b60d1a9f 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/archive/2014/09/09.rss
+++ b/blog/archive/2014/09/09.rss
@@ -466,6 +466,11 @@ Perhaps there is some package in Debian depending on sync() and
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>

+
+<p>Update 2014-09-24: Since a few days ago, enabling this optimization
+will break installation of all programs using gnutls because of
+<ahref="https://bugs.debian.org/702711">bug #702711.  An updated
+eatmydata package in Debian will solve it.</p>

 </description>
        </item>
        
 </description>
        </item>
        

diff --git a/blog/archive/2014/09/index.html b/blog/archive/2014/09/index.html
index b18c068707e1d4b0f7eec74839dadcbfa9acd8c5..54580648f57d1512c61ebfc6bdb8aacb8e6fda7b 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/archive/2014/09/index.html
+++ b/blog/archive/2014/09/index.html
@@ -497,6 +497,11 @@ fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 

+<p>Update 2014-09-24: Since a few days ago, enabling this optimization
+will break installation of all programs using gnutls because of
+<ahref="https://bugs.debian.org/702711">bug #702711.  An updated
+eatmydata package in Debian will solve it.</p>
+

       </div>
       <div class="tags">
         
       </div>
       <div class="tags">
         

diff --git a/blog/index.html b/blog/index.html
index 09fb865a34cbebc23fe254e4295f38ae12b2d444..1465d41236ed063c2f77df37730633b13f0fa3c9 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/index.html
+++ b/blog/index.html
@@ -483,6 +483,11 @@ Perhaps there is some package in Debian depending on sync() and
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>

+
+<p>Update 2014-09-24: Since a few days ago, enabling this optimization
+will break installation of all programs using gnutls because of
+<ahref="https://bugs.debian.org/702711">bug #702711.  An updated
+eatmydata package in Debian will solve it.</p>

 </div>
       <div class="tags">
         
 </div>
       <div class="tags">
         

diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss
index adcf0b19043753c730911918e9d21cc17455507e..4fcf4416e65d6283fe3463680d5ac3978826bea0 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/index.rss
+++ b/blog/index.rss
@@ -466,6 +466,11 @@ Perhaps there is some package in Debian depending on sync() and
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>

+
+<p>Update 2014-09-24: Since a few days ago, enabling this optimization
+will break installation of all programs using gnutls because of
+<ahref="https://bugs.debian.org/702711">bug #702711.  An updated
+eatmydata package in Debian will solve it.</p>

 </description>
        </item>
        
 </description>
        </item>
        

diff --git a/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss b/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss
index 39b9bf66ef3133eb85087e0924cb4adcdcbefa8a..8e1f8c60618054b74331ca2b82aca833c4b14622 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss
+++ b/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss
@@ -208,6 +208,11 @@ Perhaps there is some package in Debian depending on sync() and
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>

+
+<p>Update 2014-09-24: Since a few days ago, enabling this optimization
+will break installation of all programs using gnutls because of
+<ahref="https://bugs.debian.org/702711">bug #702711.  An updated
+eatmydata package in Debian will solve it.</p>

 </description>
        </item>
        
 </description>
        </item>
        

diff --git a/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html b/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html
index ff748afe4edccbd19337ef872f2b21f149048f7f..3ab9789c4a264b5cfb7bd2cf7a6a3caebd391d8d 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html
+++ b/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html
@@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 

+<p>Update 2014-09-24: Since a few days ago, enabling this optimization
+will break installation of all programs using gnutls because of
+<ahref="https://bugs.debian.org/702711">bug #702711.  An updated
+eatmydata package in Debian will solve it.</p>
+

       </div>
       <div class="tags">
         
       </div>
       <div class="tags">
         

diff --git a/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss b/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss
index f22608891c73aa41e5d4e6068aee09609f820d61..86a00ca89324f2b55f6520f3d0be94341a4bec44 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss
+++ b/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss
@@ -208,6 +208,11 @@ Perhaps there is some package in Debian depending on sync() and
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>

+
+<p>Update 2014-09-24: Since a few days ago, enabling this optimization
+will break installation of all programs using gnutls because of
+<ahref="https://bugs.debian.org/702711">bug #702711.  An updated
+eatmydata package in Debian will solve it.</p>

 </description>
        </item>
        
 </description>
        </item>
        

diff --git a/blog/tags/debian/index.html b/blog/tags/debian/index.html
index 39c1a60651f74b588b4cd06e492cb11fcfe58a66..c30292d110e5c934e2775032634e16ac15a1577e 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/debian/index.html
+++ b/blog/tags/debian/index.html
@@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 

+<p>Update 2014-09-24: Since a few days ago, enabling this optimization
+will break installation of all programs using gnutls because of
+<ahref="https://bugs.debian.org/702711">bug #702711.  An updated
+eatmydata package in Debian will solve it.</p>
+

       </div>
       <div class="tags">
         
       </div>
       <div class="tags">
         

diff --git a/blog/tags/english/english.rss b/blog/tags/english/english.rss
index c5847c32c86dc9f966828809de924eff1c78d5be..2ac0d6c8750e95d49532265d5d3892539caf8919 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/english/english.rss
+++ b/blog/tags/english/english.rss
@@ -208,6 +208,11 @@ Perhaps there is some package in Debian depending on sync() and
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>

+
+<p>Update 2014-09-24: Since a few days ago, enabling this optimization
+will break installation of all programs using gnutls because of
+<ahref="https://bugs.debian.org/702711">bug #702711.  An updated
+eatmydata package in Debian will solve it.</p>

 </description>
        </item>
        
 </description>
        </item>
        

diff --git a/blog/tags/english/index.html b/blog/tags/english/index.html
index f2c0c6e0eb3f360981a013e8f207b083b015f90b..67e50d8f0fca35e97297c30d7073c55358cb8927 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/tags/english/index.html
+++ b/blog/tags/english/index.html
@@ -226,6 +226,11 @@ fsync() having effect?  Perhaps it should go into its own udeb, to
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 
 allow those of us wanting to enable it to do so without affecting
 everyone.</p>
 

+<p>Update 2014-09-24: Since a few days ago, enabling this optimization
+will break installation of all programs using gnutls because of
+<ahref="https://bugs.debian.org/702711">bug #702711.  An updated
+eatmydata package in Debian will solve it.</p>
+

       </div>
       <div class="tags">
         
       </div>
       <div class="tags">