Improve text.

diff --git a/blog/data/2009-08-13-google-filtype.txt b/blog/data/2009-08-13-google-filtype.txt
index 6cad91535163e43b601715c6cfe35f9e84db5dc0..f82bae98188ad98c1104724ee47796bfd9a2d12f 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/data/2009-08-13-google-filtype.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2009-08-13-google-filtype.txt
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ Title: Relative popularity of document formats (MS Office vs. ODF)
 Tags: english, nuug, standard
 Date: 2009-08-12 15:50
 
-<p>Just for fun, I did a search on Google for a few file ODF and MS
-Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage.  I
-searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these
+<p>Just for fun, I did a search right now on Google for a few file ODF
+and MS Office based formats, to get an idea of their relative usage.
+I searched using 'filetype:odt' and equvalent terms, and got these
 results:</P>
 
 <table>
@@ -24,11 +24,12 @@ got these numbers:</p>
 <tr><td>Regneark</td> <td>ods:187      </td> <td>xlsx:372</td></tr>
 </table>
 
-<p>Wonder how these numbers change over time.  I am aware of Google
-returning different results and numbers based on where the search is
-done, so I guess these numbers will differ if they are conduced in
-another country.  Because of this, I did the same search from a
-machine in California, USA.</p>
+<p>I wonder how these numbers change over time.</p>
+
+<p>I am aware of Google returning different results and numbers based
+on where the search is done, so I guess these numbers will differ if
+they are conduced in another country.  Because of this, I did the same
+search from a machine in California, USA.</p>
 
 
 <table>