Correct DOI numbers.

diff --git a/blog/data/2020-02-27-rmj-articles.txt b/blog/data/2020-02-27-rmj-articles.txt
index 757ab5988090d5cf564e25977433b230d0fa1027..468100162e99622992d9e3c2fa066c8bca009fed 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/data/2020-02-27-rmj-articles.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2020-02-27-rmj-articles.txt
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ start working, but you can have a look at the LaTeX originals here.</p>
 <p>The first article is
 "<a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/images/2020-02-25-rmj-iot-record-keeping.pdf">A
 record-keeping approach to managing IoT-data for government
-agencies</a>" (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0056">DOI
-10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0056</a>) by Thomas Sødring, Petter Reinholdtsen
+agencies</a>" (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0050">DOI
+10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0050<a/>) by Thomas Sødring, Petter Reinholdtsen
 and David Massey, and sketches some approaches for storing measurement
 data (aka Internet of Things sensor data) in a archive, thus providing
 a well defined mechanism for screening and deletion of the information </p>
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ a well defined mechanism for screening and deletion of the information </p>
 <p>The second article is
 "<a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/images/2020-02-25-rmj-block-chain-record-keeping.pdf">Publishing
 and using record-keeping structural information in a blockchain</a>"
-(<a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0050">DOI
-10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0050<a/>) by Thomas Sødring, Petter Reinholdtsen
+(<a href="https://doi.org/10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0056">DOI
+10.1108/RMJ-09-2019-0056</a>) by Thomas Sødring, Petter Reinholdtsen
 and Svein Ølnes, where we describe a way for third parties to validate
 authenticity and thus improve trust in the records kept in a
 archive.</p>
@@ -29,3 +29,6 @@ archive.</p>
 <p>As usual, if you use Bitcoin and want to show your support of my
 activities, please send Bitcoin donations to my address
 <b><a href="bitcoin:15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b">15oWEoG9dUPovwmUL9KWAnYRtNJEkP1u1b</a></b>.</p>
+
+<p><strong>Update 2020-04-26</strong>: Initially managed to swap the
+DOI numbers.  Fixed it.</p>