-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "The nature of the content the community creates is ideal for asynchronous "
-#| "cocreation. “An encyclopedia is something where incremental community "
-#| "improvement really works,” Luis Villa, former Chief Officer of Community "
-#| "Engagement, told us. The rules and processes that govern cocreation on "
-#| "Wikipedia and its sister projects are all community-driven and vary by "
-#| "language edition. There are entire books written on the intricacies of "
-#| "their systems, but generally speaking, there are very few exceptions to "
-#| "the rule that anyone can edit any article, even without an account on "
-#| "their system. The extensive peer-review process includes elaborate "
-#| "systems to resolve disputes, methods for managing particularly "
-#| "controversial subject areas, talk pages explaining decisions, and much, "
-#| "much more. The Wikimedia Foundation’s decision to leave governance of the "
-#| "projects to the community is very deliberate. “We look at the things that "
-#| "the community can do well, and we want to let them do those things,” "
-#| "Stephen told us. Instead, the foundation focuses its time and resources "
-#| "on what the community cannot do as effectively, like the software "
-#| "engineering that supports the technical infrastructure of the sites. In "
-#| "2015-16, about half of the foundation’s budget went to direct support for "
-#| "the Wikimedia sites."