+#: MadewithCreativeCommonsmostup-to-dateversion.xml:9295
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The nature of the content the community creates is ideal for asynchronous "
+#| "cocreation. “An encyclopedia is something where incremental community "
+#| "improvement really works,” Luis Villa, former Chief Officer of Community "
+#| "Engagement, told us. The rules and processes that govern cocreation on "
+#| "Wikipedia and its sister projects are all community-driven and vary by "
+#| "language edition. There are entire books written on the intricacies of "
+#| "their systems, but generally speaking, there are very few exceptions to "
+#| "the rule that anyone can edit any article, even without an account on "
+#| "their system. The extensive peer-review process includes elaborate "
+#| "systems to resolve disputes, methods for managing particularly "
+#| "controversial subject areas, talk pages explaining decisions, and much, "
+#| "much more. The Wikimedia Foundation’s decision to leave governance of the "
+#| "projects to the community is very deliberate. “We look at the things that "
+#| "the community can do well, and we want to let them do those things,” "
+#| "Stephen told us. Instead, the foundation focuses its time and resources "
+#| "on what the community cannot do as effectively, like the software "
+#| "engineering that supports the technical infrastructure of the sites. In "
+#| "2015-16, about half of the foundation’s budget went to direct support for "
+#| "the Wikimedia sites."