From 2c9c248797b38d6774d0bb783cc4d4e44ee5f1cb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 07:47:15 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Another index.

---
 freeculture.xml | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index e1b94be..faa4e5d 100644
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -14185,8 +14185,9 @@ proportionally, though more popular artists would get more than the less
 popular. As is typical with Stallman, his proposal predates the current 
 debate by about a decade. See 
 <ulink url="http://free-culture.cc/notes/">link #85</ulink>.
-<indexterm><primary>Netanel, Neil Weinstock</primary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>Fisher, William</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Netanel, Neil Weinstock</primary></indexterm>
+<indexterm><primary>Promises to Keep</primary></indexterm>
 </para></footnote>
 Fisher suggests a very clever way around the current impasse of the
 Internet. Under his plan, all content capable of digital transmission
@@ -14212,6 +14213,7 @@ facilitate free exchange of content, supported through a taxation
 system, then it can be continued. If this form of protection is no
 longer necessary, then the system could lapse into the old system of
 controlling access.
+<indexterm><primary>Promises to Keep</primary></indexterm>
 </para>
 <para>
 Fisher would balk at the idea of allowing the system to lapse. His aim
-- 
2.47.2