From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:02:46 +0000 (+0200)
Subject: More indexes.
X-Git-Tag: edition-2015-10-10~2247
X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/text-free-culture-lessig.git/commitdiff_plain/eebee0a95ae4f1dc547c2f971a348d6f53f38fa8

More indexes.
---

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index 9b198e1..1e2b97b 100644
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -6254,6 +6254,7 @@ not only the market but also the government is a world in which
 competitors with new ideas will not succeed. It is a world of stasis and
 increasingly concentrated stagnation. It is the Soviet Union under
 Brezhnev.
+<indexterm><primary>Gates, Bill</primary></indexterm>
 </para>
 <para>
 Thus, while it is understandable for industries threatened with new
@@ -11137,6 +11138,7 @@ Kathleen Sullivan, who had argued many cases in the Court, and
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 240 -->
 who had advised us early on about a First Amendment strategy; and
 finally, former solicitor general Charles Fried.
+<indexterm><primary>Fried, Charles</primary></indexterm>
 </para>
 <para>
 Fried was a special victory for our side. Every other former solicitor
@@ -11149,6 +11151,7 @@ limited Congress's power in the context of the Commerce Clause. And
 while he had argued many positions in the Supreme Court that I
 personally disagreed with, his joining the cause was a vote of
 confidence in our argument.
+<indexterm><primary>Fried, Charles</primary></indexterm>
 </para>
 <para>
 The government, in defending the statute, had its collection of
@@ -11341,6 +11344,7 @@ One moot was before the lawyers at Jones Day. Don Ayer was the
 skeptic. He had served in the Reagan Justice Department with Solicitor
 General Charles Fried. He had argued many cases before the Supreme
 Court. And in his review of the moot, he let his concern speak:
+<indexterm><primary>Fried, Charles</primary></indexterm>
 </para>
 <para>
 "I'm just afraid that unless they really see the harm, they won't be
@@ -11701,6 +11705,7 @@ should decide the issue.
 Would it have been different if I had argued it differently? Would it
 have been different if Don Ayer had argued it? Or Charles Fried? Or
 Kathleen Sullivan?
+<indexterm><primary>Fried, Charles</primary></indexterm>
 </para>
 <para>
 My friends huddled around me to insist it would not. The Court
@@ -12638,6 +12643,7 @@ $20 billion to do good in the world, that is not inconsistent with the
 objectives of the property system. That is, on the contrary, just what
 a property system is supposed to be about: giving individuals the
 right to decide what to do with their property.
+<indexterm><primary>Gates, Bill</primary></indexterm>
 </para>
 <para>
 When Ms. Boland says that there is something wrong with a meeting