From: Petter Reinholdtsen Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 17:39:51 +0000 (+0200) Subject: Convert all to to avoid having to make up X-Git-Tag: edition-2015-10-10~1857 X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/text-free-culture-lessig.git/commitdiff_plain/337060faa011d70dea2d949300b9f7298c9ca742 Convert all
to to avoid having to make up titles to keep docbook happy. --- diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml index 386f848..f3c3f52 100644 --- a/freeculture.xml +++ b/freeculture.xml @@ -4165,8 +4165,7 @@ enough, this "taking" notwithstanding. If we put these cases together, a pattern is clear: -
-Pattern of Court and Congress response + @@ -4203,7 +4202,7 @@ together, a pattern is clear: -
+ In each case throughout our history, a new technology changed the @@ -8306,8 +8305,7 @@ combine these two distinctions and draw a clear map of the changes that copyright law has undergone. In 1790, the law looked like this: - -Law status in 1790 + @@ -8329,7 +8327,7 @@ that copyright law has undergone. In 1790, the law looked like this: -
+ The act of publishing a map, chart, and book was regulated by @@ -8344,8 +8342,7 @@ noncommercial work was also free. By the end of the nineteenth century, the law had changed to this: - -Law status at the end of ninetheenth centory + @@ -8367,7 +8364,7 @@ By the end of the nineteenth century, the law had changed to this: -
+ Derivative works were now regulated by copyright law—if @@ -8383,8 +8380,7 @@ expanded. Thus by 1975, as photocopying machines became more common, we could say the law began to look like this: - -Law status in 1975 + @@ -8406,7 +8402,7 @@ we could say the law began to look like this: -
+ The law was interpreted to reach noncommercial copying through, say, @@ -8416,8 +8412,7 @@ technologies, especially in the context of a digital network, means that the law now looks like this: - -Law status now + @@ -8439,7 +8434,7 @@ that the law now looks like this: -
+ Every realm is governed by copyright law, whereas before most