X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/text-free-culture-lessig.git/blobdiff_plain/2f2cbc96ddd6a18daaaed43d2893b0dec4f60a5f..569a0bc027bf6ed1d551606297b3b252fa89822c:/freeculture.xml

diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml
index a31f284..597d844 100644
--- a/freeculture.xml
+++ b/freeculture.xml
@@ -7560,7 +7560,7 @@ empty circle.
 </para>
 <figure id="fig-1521">
 <title>All potential uses of a book.</title>
-<graphic fileref="images/1521.svg" align="center" width="50%"></graphic>
+<graphic fileref="images/1521.svg" align="center" width="40%"></graphic>
 </figure>
 <indexterm id='idxbooksthreetypesofusesof' class='startofrange'><primary>books</primary><secondary>three types of uses of</secondary></indexterm>
 <indexterm id='idxcopyrightlawcopiesascoreissueof2' class='startofrange'><primary>copyright law</primary><secondary>copies as core issue of</secondary></indexterm>
@@ -7584,7 +7584,7 @@ acts do not make a copy.
 </para>
 <figure id="fig-1531">
 <title>Examples of unregulated uses of a book.</title>
-<graphic fileref="images/1531.png" align="center" width="50%"></graphic>
+<graphic fileref="images/1531.png" align="center" width="40%"></graphic>
 </figure>
 <para>
 Obviously, however, some uses of a copyrighted book are regulated
@@ -7605,7 +7605,7 @@ that remain unregulated because the law considers these <quote>fair uses.</quote
 <!-- PAGE BREAK 153 -->
 <figure id="fig-1541">
 <title>Republishing stands at the core of this circle of possible uses of a copyrighted work.</title>
-<graphic fileref="images/1541.svg" align="center" width="50%"></graphic>
+<graphic fileref="images/1541.svg" align="center" width="40%"></graphic>
 </figure>
 <indexterm><primary>Constitution, U.S.</primary><secondary>First Amendment to</secondary></indexterm>
 <indexterm><primary>First Amendment</primary></indexterm>
@@ -7621,12 +7621,7 @@ for public policy (and possibly First Amendment) reasons.
 </para>
 <figure id="fig-1542">
 <title>Unregulated copying considered <quote>fair uses.</quote></title>
-<graphic fileref="images/1542.png" align="center" width="50%"></graphic>
-</figure>
-<para> </para>
-<figure id="fig-1551">
-<title>Uses that before were presumptively unregulated are now presumptively regulated.</title>
-<graphic fileref="images/1551.png" align="center" width="50%"></graphic>
+<graphic fileref="images/1542.svg" align="center" width="40%"></graphic>
 </figure>
 <indexterm id='idxcopyrightusagerestrictionsattachedto' class='startofrange'><primary>copyright</primary><secondary>usage restrictions attached to</secondary></indexterm>
 <para>
@@ -7688,6 +7683,10 @@ then whenever you read the book (or any portion of it) beyond the
 fifth time, you are making a copy of the book contrary to the
 copyright owner's wish.
 </para>
+<figure id="fig-1551">
+<title>Uses that before were presumptively unregulated are now presumptively regulated.</title>
+<graphic fileref="images/1551.svg" align="center" width="40%"></graphic>
+</figure>
 <para>
 There are some people who think this makes perfect sense. My aim
 just now is not to argue about whether it makes sense or not. My aim
@@ -8421,8 +8420,9 @@ some uses that were illegal, the court held the companies producing
 the VCR responsible.
 </para>
 <para>
-This led Conrad to draw the cartoon below, which we can adopt to
-the DMCA.
+This led Conrad to draw the cartoon in
+<xref linkend="fig-1711-vcr-handgun-cartoonfig"/>, which we can adopt
+to the DMCA.
 <indexterm><primary>Conrad, Paul</primary></indexterm>
 </para>
 <para>
@@ -8445,9 +8445,9 @@ practice or to protect against an intruder. At least some would say that
 such a use would be good. It, too, is a technology that has both good
 and bad uses.
 </para>
-<figure id="fig-1711-vcr-handgun-cartoonfig">
+<figure id="fig-1711-vcr-handgun-cartoonfig" float="1">
 <title>VCR/handgun cartoon.</title>
-<graphic fileref="images/1711.png" align="center" width="70%"></graphic>
+<graphic fileref="images/1711.png" align="center" width="100%"></graphic>
 </figure>
 <indexterm><primary>Conrad, Paul</primary></indexterm>
 <para>
@@ -12749,9 +12749,9 @@ my view of the case, was Ruben Bolling's, reproduced in
 unfair. But the punch in the face felt exactly like that.
 <indexterm><primary>Bolling, Ruben</primary></indexterm>
 </para>
-<figure id="fig-18">
+<figure id="fig-18" float="1">
 <title>Tom the Dancing Bug cartoon</title>
-<graphic fileref="images/tom-the-dancing-bug.png" align="center" width="95%"></graphic>
+<graphic fileref="images/tom-the-dancing-bug.png" align="center" width="100%"></graphic>
 <indexterm><primary>Bolling, Ruben</primary></indexterm>
 </figure>
 <para>