X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/text-free-culture-lessig.git/blobdiff_plain/1d03c9d12192efb23ef9be23859aedfe3e7cf4a0..435f8930aa4c0db12823c0cb0e6c3d12b3efeec7:/freeculture.xml diff --git a/freeculture.xml b/freeculture.xml index fa1a4e0..c2eaba3 100644 --- a/freeculture.xml +++ b/freeculture.xml @@ -845,6 +845,7 @@ individuals shared and transformed their culture—telling stories, reenacting scenes from plays or TV, participating in fan clubs, sharing music, making tapes—were left alone by the law. +Copyright infringement lawsuitscommercial creativity as primary purpose of The focus of the law was on commercial creativity. At first slightly, then quite extensively, the law protected the incentives of creators by @@ -888,6 +889,7 @@ been undone. The consequence is that we are less and less a free culture, more and more a permission culture. +protection of artists vs. business interests This change gets justified as necessary to protect commercial creativity. And indeed, protectionism is precisely its @@ -901,6 +903,7 @@ shared have united to induce lawmakers to use the law to protect them. It is the story of RCA and Armstrong; it is the dream of the Causbys. + For the Internet has unleashed an extraordinary possibility for many to participate in the process of building and cultivating a culture @@ -962,6 +965,10 @@ and a much more dramatic change. My fear is that unless we come to see this change, the war to rid the world of Internet pirates will also rid our culture of values that have been integral to our tradition from the start. +Constitution, U.S.First Amendment to +Copyright lawas protection of creators +First Amendment +Netanel, Neil Weinstock These values built a tradition that, for at least the first 180 years of our Republic, guaranteed creators the right to build freely upon their @@ -1009,6 +1016,7 @@ come to understand the source of this war. We must resolve it soon. Causby, Thomas Lee Causby, Tinie +intellectual property rights Like the Causbys' battle, this war is, in part, about property. The property of this war is not as tangible as the Causbys', and no @@ -1084,6 +1092,7 @@ sheriff arresting an airplane for trespass. But the consequences of this silliness will be much more profound. + The struggle that rages just now centers on two ideas: piracy and property. My aim in this book's next two parts is to explore these two @@ -1123,7 +1132,7 @@ to which most of us remain oblivious. Copyright lawEnglish -Mansfield, William Murray, Lord +Mansfield, William Murray, Lord music publishing sheet music @@ -1142,8 +1151,10 @@ of them for his own use. Bach v. Longman, 98 Eng. Rep. 1274 (1777) (Mansfield). - + +Internet efficient content distribution on +peer-to-peer (p2p) file sharingefficiency of Today we are in the middle of another war against piracy. The Internet has provoked this war. The Internet makes possible the @@ -1161,6 +1172,7 @@ sharing of copyrighted content. That sharing in turn has excited the war, as copyright owners fear the sharing will rob the author of the profit. + The warriors have turned to the courts, to the legislatures, and increasingly to technology to defend their property against this @@ -1191,7 +1203,8 @@ piracy. ASCAP Dreyfuss, Rochelle Girl Scouts -if value, then right theory +creative propertyif value, then right theory of +if value, then right theory This view runs deep within the current debates. It is what NYU law professor Rochelle Dreyfuss criticizes as the if value, then right @@ -1215,6 +1228,7 @@ Speech, No One Wins, Boston Globe, 24 November 20 There was value (the songs) so there must have been a right—even against the Girl Scouts. + This idea is certainly a possible understanding of how creative property should work. It might well be a possible design for a system @@ -1223,7 +1237,9 @@ of law protecting creative property. But the if value, then right theory of creative property has never been America's theory of creative property. It has never taken hold within our law. - + +copyright lawon republishing vs. transformation of original work +creativitylegal restrictions on Instead, in our tradition, intellectual property is an instrument. It sets the groundwork for a richly creative society but remains @@ -1238,6 +1254,7 @@ work on the one hand and building upon or transforming that work on the other. Copyright law at its birth had only publishing as its concern; copyright law today regulates both. + Before the technologies of the Internet, this conflation didn't matter all that much. The technologies of publishing were expensive; that @@ -1246,6 +1263,7 @@ entities could bear the burden of the law—even the burden of the Byzantine complexity that copyright law has become. It was just one more expense of doing business. +copyright lawcreativity impeded by Florida, Richard Rise of the Creative Class, The (Florida) @@ -1283,6 +1301,7 @@ under which it will be enabled are much more tenuous. Unfortunately, we are also seeing an extraordinary rise of regulation of this creative class. + These burdens make no sense in our tradition. We should begin by understanding that tradition a bit more and by placing in their proper @@ -1293,8 +1312,11 @@ context the current battles about behavior labeled piracy. CHAPTER ONE: Creators -animated cartoons +animated cartoons cartoon films +filmsanimated +Steamboat Willie +Mickey Mouse In 1928, a cartoon character was born. An early Mickey Mouse made his debut in May of that year, in a silent flop called Plane Crazy. @@ -1302,6 +1324,7 @@ In November, in New York City's Colony Theater, in the first widely distributed cartoon synchronized with sound, Steamboat Willie brought to life the character that would become Mickey Mouse. +Disney, Walt Synchronized sound had been introduced to film a year earlier in the movie The Jazz Singer. That success led Walt Disney to copy the @@ -1352,6 +1375,9 @@ Disney's invention that set the standard that others struggled to match. And quite often, Disney's great genius, his spark of creativity, was built upon the work of others. + +Keaton, Buster +Steamboat Bill, Jr. This much is familiar. What you might not know is that 1928 also marks another important transition. In that year, a comic (as opposed to @@ -1366,6 +1392,8 @@ Jr. was a classic of this form, famous among film buffs for its incredible stunts. The film was classic Keaton—wildly popular and among the best of its genre. +derivative workspiracy vs. +piracyderivative work vs. Steamboat Bill, Jr. appeared before Disney's cartoon Steamboat Willie. @@ -1389,6 +1417,12 @@ Steamboat Bill, Jr., itself inspired by the song Steamboat Bill, that we get Steamboat Willie, and then from Steamboat Willie, Mickey Mouse. + + + + +creativityby transforming previous works +Disney, Inc. This borrowing was nothing unique, either for Disney or for the industry. Disney was always parroting the feature-length mainstream @@ -1408,6 +1442,7 @@ were built upon a base that was borrowed. Disney added to the work of others before him, creating something new out of something just barely old. +Grimm fairy tales Sometimes this borrowing was slight. Sometimes it was significant. Think about the fairy tales of the Brothers Grimm. If you're as @@ -1439,7 +1474,7 @@ creativity from the culture around him, mixed that creativity with his own extraordinary talent, and then burned that mix into the soul of his culture. Rip, mix, and burn. - + This is a kind of creativity. It is a creativity that we should remember and celebrate. There are some who would say that there is no @@ -1449,6 +1484,12 @@ would be a bit misleading. It is, more precisely, Walt Disney creativity—a form of expression and genius that builds upon the culture around us and makes it something different. + + + +copyrightduration of +public domaindefined +public domaintraditional term for conversion to In 1928, the culture that Disney was free to draw upon was relatively fresh. The public domain in 1928 was not very old and was therefore quite vibrant. The average term of copyright was just around @@ -1480,6 +1521,8 @@ for Disney to use and build upon in 1928. It was free for anyone— whether connected or not, whether rich or not, whether approved or not—to use and build upon. + + This is the ways things always were—until quite recently. For most of our history, the public domain was just over the horizon. From @@ -1494,12 +1537,22 @@ permission. Yet today, the public domain is presumptive only for content from before the Great Depression. + + + + +Disney, Walt Of course, Walt Disney had no monopoly on Walt Disney creativity. Nor does America. The norm of free culture has, until recently, and except within totalitarian nations, been broadly exploited and quite universal. +comics, Japanese +derivative workspiracy vs. +Japanese comics +manga +piracyderivative work vs. Consider, for example, a form of creativity that seems strange to many Americans but that is inescapable within Japanese culture: manga, or @@ -1525,6 +1578,8 @@ But my purpose here is not to understand manga. It is to describe a variant on manga that from a lawyer's perspective is quite odd, but from a Disney perspective is quite familiar. +creativityby transforming previous works +doujinshi comics This is the phenomenon of doujinshi. Doujinshi are also comics, but they are a kind of copycat comic. A rich ethic governs the creation of @@ -1540,6 +1595,7 @@ must be different if they are to be considered true doujinshi. Indeed, there are committees that review doujinshi for inclusion within shows and reject any copycat comic that is merely a copy. +Disney, Walt These copycat comics are not a tiny part of the manga market. They are huge. More than 33,000 circles of creators from across Japan produce @@ -1551,6 +1607,8 @@ competes with that market, but there is no sustained effort by those who control the commercial manga market to shut the doujinshi market down. It flourishes, despite the competition and despite the law. +copyright lawJapanese +Steamboat Bill, Jr. The most puzzling feature of the doujinshi market, for those trained in the law, at least, is that it is allowed to exist at all. Under @@ -1565,6 +1623,7 @@ the permission of the original copyright owner is illegal. It is an infringement of the original copyright to make a copy or a derivative work without the original copyright owner's permission. + Winick, Judd Yet this illegal market exists and indeed flourishes in Japan, and in @@ -1581,6 +1640,7 @@ For an excellent history, see Scott McCloud, Reinventing Comics + Superman comics American comics now are quite different, Winick explains, in part @@ -1590,7 +1650,10 @@ and you have to stick to them. There are things Superman cannotAs a creator, it's frustrating having to stick to some parameters which are fifty years old. - + +copyright lawJapanese +comics, Japanese +Mehra, Salil The norm in Japan mitigates this legal difficulty. Some say it is precisely the benefit accruing to the Japanese manga market that @@ -1610,6 +1673,9 @@ individual self-interest and decide not to press their legal rights. This is essentially a prisoner's dilemma solved. + + + The problem with this story, however, as Mehra plainly acknowledges, is that the mechanism producing this laissez faire response is not @@ -1621,6 +1687,8 @@ individual manga artists have sued doujinshi artists, why is there not a more general pattern of blocking this free taking by the doujinshi culture? + + I spent four wonderful months in Japan, and I asked this question as often as I could. Perhaps the best account in the end was offered by @@ -1640,6 +1708,7 @@ uncompensated sharing? Does piracy here hurt the victims of the piracy, or does it help them? Would lawyers fighting this piracy help their clients or hurt them? + Let's pause for a moment. @@ -1667,6 +1736,9 @@ A large, diverse society cannot survive without property; a large, diverse, and modern society cannot flourish without intellectual property. +Disney, Walt +Grimm fairy tales +Keaton, Buster But it takes just a second's reflection to realize that there is plenty of value out there that property doesn't capture. I don't @@ -1682,6 +1754,7 @@ Disney's use would have been considered fair. There was nothing wrong with the taking from the Grimms because the Grimms' work was in the public domain. +free culturederivative works based on Thus, even though the things that Disney took—or more generally, the things taken by anyone exercising Walt Disney creativity—are @@ -1691,6 +1764,12 @@ valuable, our tradition does not treat those takings as wrong. Some things remain free for the taking within a free culture, and that freedom is good. + +copyright lawJapanese +comics, Japanese +doujinshi comics +Japanese comics +manga The same with the doujinshi culture. If a doujinshi artist broke into a publisher's office and ran off with a thousand copies of his latest @@ -1699,12 +1778,20 @@ saying the artist was wrong. In addition to having trespassed, he would have stolen something of value. The law bans that stealing in whatever form, whether large or small. + Yet there is an obvious reluctance, even among Japanese lawyers, to say that the copycat comic artists are stealing. This form of Walt Disney creativity is seen as fair and right, even if lawyers in particular find it hard to say why. + + + + + + +Shakespeare, William It's the same with a thousand examples that appear everywhere once you begin to look. Scientists build upon the work of other scientists @@ -1730,6 +1817,7 @@ every society has left a certain bit of its culture free for the taking—fr societies more fully than unfree, perhaps, but all societies to some degree. + The hard question is therefore not whether a culture is free. All cultures are free to some degree. The hard @@ -1747,14 +1835,15 @@ Free cultures are cultures that leave a great deal open for others to build upon; unfree, or permission, cultures leave much less. Ours was a free culture. It is becoming much less so. + CHAPTER TWO: <quote>Mere Copyists</quote> -camera technology -photography Daguerre, Louis +camera technology +photography In 1839, Louis Daguerre invented the first practical technology for producing what we would call @@ -1790,7 +1879,8 @@ a developer, driving the costs of photography down substantially. By lowering the costs, Eastman expected he could dramatically broaden the population of photographers. -Kodak Primer, The (Eastman) +Kodak cameras +Kodak Primer, The (Eastman) Eastman developed flexible, emulsion-coated paper film and placed rolls of it in small, simple cameras: the Kodak. The device was @@ -1813,12 +1903,13 @@ preliminary study, without a darkroom and without chemicals. +Coe, Brian Brian Coe, The Birth of Photography (New York: Taplinger Publishing, 1977), 53. -Coe, Brian + For $25, anyone could make pictures. The camera came preloaded with film, and when it had been used, the camera was returned to an @@ -1838,7 +1929,6 @@ an average annual increase of over 17 percent. Based on a chart in Jenkins, p. 178. - Coe, Brian @@ -1857,6 +1947,8 @@ interpretation or bias. Coe, 58. +democracyin technologies of expression +expression, technologies ofdemocratic In this way, the Kodak camera and film were technologies of expression. The pencil or paintbrush was also a technology of @@ -1870,6 +1962,8 @@ creativity that the Kodak enabled. Democratic tools gave ordinary people a way to express themselves more easily than any tools could have before. + +permissionsphotography exempted from What was required for this technology to flourish? Obviously, Eastman's genius was an important part. But also important was the @@ -1887,6 +1981,8 @@ v. N.E. Life Ins. Co., 50 S.E. 68 (Ga. 1905); Dist. Ct. 1894). + +Disney, Walt The arguments in favor of requiring permission will sound surprisingly familiar. The photographer was taking something from the person or @@ -1899,6 +1995,7 @@ Mickey, so, too, should these photographers not be free to take images that they thought valuable. Brandeis, Louis D. +Steamboat Bill, Jr. On the other side was an argument that should be familiar, as well. Sure, there may be something of value being used. But citizens should @@ -1916,6 +2013,7 @@ gets something for nothing. Just as Disney could take inspiration from Steamboat Bill, Jr. or the Brothers Grimm, the photographer should be free to capture an image without compensating the source. + images, ownership of Fortunately for Mr. Eastman, and for photography in general, these @@ -1935,6 +2033,7 @@ Inc., 971 F. 2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1992), cert. denied, 508 U.S. 951 (1993). ) +Napster We can only speculate about how photography would have developed had the law gone the other way. If the presumption had been against the @@ -1950,6 +2049,8 @@ imagine the law then requiring that some form of permission be demonstrated before a company developed pictures. We could imagine a system developing to demonstrate that permission. +democracyin technologies of expression +expression, technologies ofdemocratic @@ -1965,7 +2066,9 @@ that growth would have been realized. And certainly, nothing like that growth in a democratic technology of expression would have been realized. -camera technology + + + If you drive through San Francisco's Presidio, you might see two gaudy yellow school buses @@ -1982,8 +2085,6 @@ schools and enable three hundred to five hundred children to learn something about media by doing something with media. By doing, they think. By tinkering, they learn. - - These buses are not cheap, but the technology they carry is increasingly so. The cost of a high-quality digital video system has @@ -4342,6 +4443,7 @@ technology to benefit from content made before. It balanced the interests at stake. +Disney, Walt When you think across these examples, and the other examples that make up the first four chapters of this section, this balance makes @@ -4856,7 +4958,7 @@ Exploding the Myth of Common Law Copyright, Wayne Law Review< (1983): 1152. -Mansfield, William Murray, Lord +Mansfield, William Murray, Lord Astonishingly to modern lawyers, one of the greatest judges in English history, Lord Mansfield, agreed with the booksellers. Whatever @@ -4882,7 +4984,7 @@ a reasonable period of time. Within twenty-one years, Parliament believed, Britain would mature from the controlled culture that the Crown coveted to the free culture that we inherited. - + The fight to defend the limits of the Statute of Anne was not to end there, however, and it is here that Donaldson enters the mix. @@ -5904,6 +6006,7 @@ proud of. Up there with the Library of Alexandria, putting a man on the moon, and the invention of the printing press. +Disney, Walt Kahle is not the only librarian. The Internet Archive is not the only archive. But Kahle and the Internet Archive suggest what the future of @@ -7034,6 +7137,8 @@ pp. 53–59). These two different uses of my creative work are treated the same. +Disney, Walt +Mickey Mouse This again may seem right to you. If I wrote a book, then why should you be able to write a movie that takes my story and makes money from @@ -10452,6 +10557,8 @@ gave birth to a hobby, and his hobby begat a cause: Eldred would build a library of public domain works by scanning these works and making them available for free. +Disney, Walt +Grimm fairy tales Eldred's library was not simply a copy of certain public domain works, though even a copy would have been of great value to people @@ -10475,7 +10582,8 @@ animated cartoons, sometimes successfully (Cinderella), s (The Hunchback of Notre Dame, Treasure Planet). These are all commercial publications of public domain works. - + + The Internet created the possibility of noncommercial publications of public domain works. Eldred's is just one example. There are literally @@ -10827,6 +10935,10 @@ its politics struck me as extraordinarily boring. I was not going to devote my life to teaching constitutional law if these nine Justices were going to be petty politicians. +Constitution, U.S.copyright purpose established in +copyrightconstitutional purpose of +copyrightduration of +Disney, Walt Now let's pause for a moment to make sure we understand what the argument in @@ -14788,7 +14900,7 @@ permission produces. Again, this is the reality of Brezhnev's Russia. The law should regulate in certain areas of culture—but it should regulate culture only where that regulation does good. Yet lawyers - + rarely test their power, or the power they promote, against this simple pragmatic question: Will it do good? When challenged about the expanding reach of the law, the lawyer answers, Why not?