From 1ad5a1bcf7b720bd6c3ed7cb038792ff486bdc15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petter Reinholdtsen UPl!wkxs_ldoQt?22
z{v5xuIk-~&m6UL?X@nko>13b2_+7v3XB2e!o*IkT4Yi)*;IzH-2bcNj%Hyx2D1U$d
z_=)V*%YF-!O3RA2H;+^`mm~@~KFHGh9g3zwkL!zAzTrN&iRBjO%*#GYpI)(@&WE(M
zQfVhuhk_sZXKB6awPH_50c9O$IHY;wAzFr#o(EWFj2QOz73@4ljjG7E6dMFHe{Qgm
zRKC=ihkuMxn6*+tMDK4YdL^&XV81#Kyu+78D|ELHQjcKD_Q%(j%ae|h{>ISBGe|R-
zqQxbzFG$C}dEpZ|v!FMDb+dJQ$s5^GoOh5QnGK$5(&FMQT~X}|k
zy3~2wiu+2uqlg|3B1o;0bjrQ?>$##{{K0>zPANgPER^yDpRxGZcB66O;79$d1Yy?b
zD(>HWgw$*es1niM$4i5go 0OLjE%SMg4`s*w9u1H_%;tW~_BoK!tjayhBxobY>
zfJo&Vc~y-u93cWa84Uh?=RXlvX?7pQ4Kx%E=@=@5((ju~cf!OHCZ|NxMDhkc`f@cQ
z6y@Y_BM|%@{{iLBypj!7
Published by Petter Reinholdtsen.
- ISBN 978-82-93828-05-1 (hard cover)
+ ISBN 978-82-93828-XX-X (hard cover)
- ISBN 978-82-93828-06-8 (paperback)
+ ISBN 978-82-93828-XX-X (paperback)
- ISBN 978-82-93828-07-5 (ePub)
+ ISBN 978-82-93828-XX-X (ePub)
This book is available for purchase from
https://www.lulu.com/.
diff --git a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.epub b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.epub
index 694d6419603058869a2ce9bb5d7a2a6741754881..9c22be346b733d2522d86a5b055db61c45877ba9 100644
GIT binary patch
delta 10357
zcmZ9SbzD?U!?4+1y1S(tq?GQIl}3>6?nZh+x|;*i(v6bR-68@K(kYFkfW*f>_x=9f
z_xbjZbImm~XJ+=qoH=u*JQpV-9|u!S5rT-00RM$GCSeMKpSJRh@U7$e(>6s7L
- In a world as complex as this one, we have to defer to authorities, and we
-keep them honest by making those authorities accountable to us and binding
-them with rules to prevent conflicts of interest. We canât possibly acquire
-the expertise to adjudicate conflicting claims about the best way to make
-the world safe and prosperous, but we can determine
-whether the adjudication process itself is trustworthy.
-
- Right now, itâs obviously not.
-
- The past 40 years of rising inequality and industry concentration, together
-with increasingly weak accountability and transparency for expert agencies,
-has created an increasingly urgent sense of impending doom, the sense that
-there are vast conspiracies afoot that operate with tacit official approval
-despite the likelihood they are working to better themselves by ruining the
-rest of us.
-
- For example, itâs been decades since Exxonâs own scientists concluded that
-its products would render the Earth uninhabitable by humans. And yet those
-decades were lost to us, in large part because Exxon lobbied governments and
-sowed doubt about the dangers of its products and did so with the
-cooperation of many public officials. When the survival of you and everyone
-you love is threatened by conspiracies, itâs not unreasonable to start
-questioning the things you think you know in an attempt to determine whether
-they, too, are the outcome of another conspiracy.
+ I en verden så kompleks som denne, må vi stole på til myndighetene, og vi
+holder dem ærlige ved å gjøre disse myndighetene ansvarlige overfor oss og
+begrense dem med regler for å forhindre interessekonflikter. Vi kan umulig
+tilegne oss ekspertisen til å bedømme motstridende påstander om den beste
+måten å gjøre verden trygg og velstående på, men vi kan
+avgjøre om selve bedømmelsesprosessen er troverdig.
+
+ Akkurat nå er det åpenbart ikke tilfelle.
+
+ De siste 40 årene med økende ulikhet og industrikonsentrasjon, sammen med
+stadig svakere ansvarlighet og åpenhet for ekspertbyråer, har skapt en
+stadig mer presserende følelse av forestående undergang, følelsen av at det
+er store konspirasjoner på gang som opererer med stilltiende offisiell
+godkjenning til tross for sannsynligheten for at de jobber for å gjøre det
+bedre for seg selv ved å ødelegge for resten av oss.
+
+ For eksempel er det flere tiår siden Essos egne forskere konkluderte med at
+produktene deres ville gjøre jorden ubeboelig for mennesker. Og likevel gikk
+disse tiårene tapt for oss, i stor grad fordi Esso lobbierte myndighetene og
+sådde tvil om farene ved produktene sine og gjorde det i samarbeid med mange
+offentlige tjenestemenn. NÃ¥r overlevelsen til deg selv og alle du elsker er
+truet av konspirasjoner, er det ikke urimelig å begynne å stille spørsmål
+ved de tingene du tror du vet for å forsøke å avgjøre om de også er
+resultatet av en annen konspirasjon.
The collapse of the credibility of our systems for divining and upholding
truths has left us in a state of epistemological chaos. Once, most of us
@@ -2374,11 +2374,11 @@ peer-reviewed research on opioid safety wereGd
=7`u)xX`7Ta)^rayt5OxK4lfgGr^>xBDhtu&>wST$4$eklCM~
zr^ddQJ4NYiwMSzwIqHsPu3ue4s;d4zlDa`f#%imeS!Md<@4;ynKabtNwd)C)Sj?T)
z8m9aEtK#*I4RNQ`%@9;Y*14@OgqQ7ta>SBfyq@0s=tf{~H+%rLZPK17(`Ar8bw7Aq
z(=oYS;Ulb3
zED|B&gqUL=Xd0Y*RYR)aW+{q`M5(;=a310seD^GG<>JUq8AcdAFpH4^lrft=E&hfh
z;f-
QbFhc1Pb&tZK}tVSb1(Ao}vU@(bt=qM_m
z6yamkGaFMFa(nyQ+BJj6zF}GMJB(?NMS8jEP_ndDH8=N6tvb0U+8FekEU}EBD2tAI
z`B#P{U6dc5dsx%|r!%3m(l&yi~qb*abgzubRwUhV?b)_(F
- Iâm 100% certain that vaccinating is safe and effective, but Iâm also at -something of a loss to explain exactly, precisely, why -I believe this, given all the corruption I know about and the many times the -stamp of certainty has turned out to be a parochial lie told to further -enrich the super rich. + Jeg er 100% sikker pÃ¥ at vaksinering er trygt og effektivt, men jeg er ogsÃ¥ +litt fortapt nÃ¥r jeg skal forklare akkurat hvorfor jeg +tror dette, gitt alle korrupsjon jeg vet om og de mange ganger trygghetens +stempel har vist seg Ã¥ være en parodisk løgn fortalt Ã¥ gjøre de superrike +enda rikere.
Fake news â conspiracy theories, racist ideologies, scientific denialism â has always been with us. Whatâs changed today is not the mix of ideas in the diff --git a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.pdf b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.pdf index 8f19cad6a1966a678022393afefe0923da0aca80..4acd6ff597643d77d8a000784751b42c6cb6e7be 100644 GIT binary patch delta 13611 zcmaiaQ*15_ux)MIwr!icwr!hVZM)sIZQJIqZQE||f6vo-JDFs%GMQx7)5@C3e6*kj zwV~Dk&< zWk9~&i66M)r@#SekJN-Q;tgwbceh>86D%quvkxN=M=uWc4C)R5*&ZsfOfzpMm%crD zqdEDWH}a2{)4JUq-5>AAZ}AvS;M2c
@Cm4DT0+WwMFvVeWlCDbf
z_ycGrI|@Qg9RyBIGz&9KvdP29B}!_*<_DSniy+fHzge?UW@GGrs3AO2*s9d80^+)hhsiG=wrlEQ(~4&c}DTupDqWiZo1BqvR=ybD7kABbpbk90vK{Ok6UD
zpJ7leqYM)$V=6PyB*wnK*~0D$^zewbQV-9J-avkE(C~h?nh*5y1pO#O6r1$#!54#A|e&9eng*8+2T
zscZ?z1oAd!s^-^;i%IF{$p1cx;#KoHjh1br2
zt+M8}ll(X}VjqQ$n}kKN?xGyngSuruenX*rueg?;EFsoAsFt{4oea~5#564&a@Ad`
zy{m)ba5XHk*KCqE^9ulP+=m|n>=VosX_``~7ysOq4R25KgER)|k%WCBo#Y92gUnQLC
zC||%?J~SbNW7FNQx5^5iR2XL^BOiq=C*QmlHQO<(T+Fxo_Xw!E3x5LoQrsf=TAoj1
z_`oXsCEN2;r45FJ?Nn1N9@lfUjiXo5wNl?RWGn-#cJWXI<6eNO$i6(B5_{K9g0(Pu
zfFjnx_8$1pjV1r!l^nEBk^d9*A$7zyM%94_ra9fGL9p%RV&mPaHMwAMwN0wMixE3;
zpQzwSCzn+?+jlm>Ub@+f_-6k($++IKj`rsqdaA(l<
kO!-|JV>V2j8u$EvabTP|QrrPKe5R?~qNnc!hihUt
zXOv}eIKu8j(*|z+*RUTy5nfC>KAt6ig=^Et7R`d;oxyBqH!AO+vQ+r-&GmYVgOvoj
zyd_aYE)a0U9AJs-<~7n&BNb(yRfbx40#ms!pd6M&{XN{-);CNuMIsJPxjhDgPecO?
z`u#=7C5Z*+rL^7Qt&>xhO(e7ykNat}eY<(5X&Fdng6sKdPEQ7;F~DkTAf{$y#YY3+
zrb=jzMLqEhF{Hlyu*z|&*Zi|S%}R;*ISm5aKD U7sLHFeG55CeC%&|c`ZA!Kp*7L
zfp38#MEO%hQaLme4Er%UPg{=N2wK5WY=NAv9tIr&7KfZ|ijF`nLzdm1n9fM+zO=AZ
zZo7ZU;`;uIT4$D8qcpdfu}JP0xV?&yXniQmN~gBqgA4iwaNWjk4?&8Rncd)4;Jjb)
zw{C&c5d_8QTE0TtK<-V=kAMmh+wxoA2DM(E#vYuhlrBr%C;_rBo{l8w3A7qvSK_?5
zt6y?@+T^TvNHh4P$`W!oiDHzf4{1`nl&`1sa=Cwx$l30XO<7#AwE;RhO>s8P-B~H_
zBXXKexhK`WKxhesq6=55u-|xFN=Uqx(BVg)tY?rfR7=nao93wjA_p5BJt}A0-uC4U
zmnK>VVYh?bB4unaBNw8CbWs%d`-SH#kC0=Q
UrV!Oknlk5JrnTx7fu
zo$A8@V1hmGZU-BHP0kK;JMqstRl&mEy~@N*KaZ4s+@WHiKb{osF>VO1oNoPLj9)-Y
z!j`)H5afAA&(8>y!UVFSq68$F?dJ#-lPJ@a%S8X1qGz&X(|FT(Bw3-&3&_l$nLj&B
zVJPbf0WHAF&es55ii?KB+19t9@8OrjXb#=G7PqQZ7qM+Uab^OFhb|Yu8l6}@0Zm*U
z^&x_(w*^#@U9dQp=qY@M;t5=Z^A2el%QjL=n9%p^lkrpT+_%byQvkXtQZ2oTA}sv%
zPoq0<