From: Petter Reinholdtsen Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 00:10:33 +0000 (+0100) Subject: Updated published files. X-Git-Tag: nb-printed-2021-01-24~265 X-Git-Url: https://pere.pagekite.me/gitweb/text-destroy-surveillance.git/commitdiff_plain/b89380d6c8ebb750f81c803566c9b60ec8f5cf09 Updated published files. --- diff --git a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.epub b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.epub index da3d881..210a082 100644 Binary files a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.epub and b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.epub differ diff --git a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.html b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.html index 7d7b092..ec6efbc 100644 --- a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.html +++ b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.html @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Reinholdtsen, Allan Nordhøy, Christer Gundersen og Lorentz Even Hermansen. Hvis du finner skrivefeil, feil eller har korreksjoner til den oversatte teksten, så er det veldig fint hvis du oppdaterer på https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/rms-personal-data-safe/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism/nb_NO/.

- Creative Commons, noen rettigheter forbeholdt + Creative Commons, noen rettigheter forbeholdt

Denne boken er lisensiert med en Creative Commons-lisens. Denne lisensen tillater all bruk av dette verket, så lenge opphavet navngis og intet diff --git a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.pdf b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.pdf index a9d4037..b5dd2cb 100644 Binary files a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.pdf and b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.nb.pdf differ diff --git a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.epub b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.epub index 01e15ae..3d28249 100644 Binary files a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.epub and b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.epub differ diff --git a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.html b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.html index 02bc8a4..cfcdeb9 100644 --- a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.html +++ b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.html @@ -23,14 +23,16 @@ Cory Doctorow. Jeśli znajdziesz literówkę, błąd lub masz inne uwagi na temat poprawienia tekstu, proszę zaktualizuj to na https://hosted.weblate.org/projects/rms-personal-data-safe/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism/nb_NO/.

- Creative Commons, Pewne prawa zastrzeżone + Creative Commons, Pewne prawa zastrzeżone

Ta książka jest wydana na licencji Creative Commons. Licencja ta pozwala na dowolny użytek tej pracy tak długo, dopóki podane jest jej autorstwo i nie jest rozpowszechniany żaden materiał pochodny. Więcej informacji na temat tej licencji znajdziesz na https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/. -

Table of Contents

Sieć tysięcy kłamstw
Digital rights activism, a quarter-century on
Tech exceptionalism, then and now
Don’t believe the hype
What is persuasion?
1. Segmenting
2. Deception
3. Domination
4. Bypassing our rational faculties
If data is the new oil, then surveillance capitalism’s engine has a leak
What is Facebook?
Monopoly and the right to the future tense
Search order and the right to the future tense
Monopolists can afford sleeping pills for watchdogs
Privacy and monopoly
Ronald Reagan, pioneer of tech monopolism
Steering with the windshield wipers
Surveillance still matters
Dignity and sanctuary
Afflicting the afflicted
Any data you collect and retain will eventually leak
Critical tech exceptionalism is still tech exceptionalism
How monopolies, not mind control, drive surveillance capitalism: The -Snapchat story
A monopoly over your friends
Fake news is an epistemological crisis
Tech is different
Ownership of facts
Persuasion works… slowly
Paying won’t help
An “ecology” moment for trustbusting
Make Big Tech small again
20 GOTO 10
Up and through

Sieć tysięcy kłamstw

+

Table of Contents

Sieć tysięcy kłamstw
Aktywizm praw cyfrowych, krótka historia 25 lat działalności
Wyjątkowość Technologii, dawniej i obecnie
Nie wierz 'szumom' medialnym
Co to jest przekonywanie?
1. Segmentacja
2. Podstęp
3. Dominacja
4. Omijanie naszych racjonalnych zdolności
Jeśli dane są nowym paliwem, to silnik kapitalistycznych systemów nadzoru ma +wyciek
Co to jest Facebook?
Monopol i prawo do czasu przyszłego
Porządek wyszukiwania i prawo do czasu przyszłego
Monopoliści mogą sobie pozwolić na proszki nasenne dla strażników
Prywatność a monopol
Ronald Reagan, pionier monopolizmu technologicznego
Sterowanie za pomocą wycieraczek przedniej szyby
Systemy nadzoru mają ciągle znaczenie
Godność i sanktuarium
Dręczenie udręczonych
Jakiekolwiek dane, które zbierasz i przetwarzasz, kiedyś w końcu wyciekną
Przełomowa wyjątkowość technologiczna jest nadal technologiczną +wyjątkowością
Jak monopole, a nie kontrola umysłu, sterują kapitalizmen opartym na +systemach nadzoru: historia Snapchat
Monopol sprawowany nad twoimi przyjaciółmi
Fałszywe wiadomości to oznaka kryzysu epistemologicznego
Technologia jest czymś odmiennym
Własność faktów
Przekonywanie działa… powoli
Płacenie nie pomoże
“ ekologia” chwila na zerwanie zaufania
Spraw, aby 'Big Tech' stała się ponownie 'małą' technologią
20 GOTO 10
W górę i na wylot

Sieć tysięcy kłamstw

Najbardziej zaskakującą kwestią w dziedzinie powtórnych narodzin płaskich Ziemian w 21 wieku jest to, jak szeroko rozpowszechnione są przeciwko nim dowody. Można teraz zrozumieć, jak przed wiekami ludzie, którzy nigdy nie @@ -51,26 +53,28 @@ sekwencjonujoącej geny, wraz ze skromną sumą pieniędzy, nigdy nie było łatwiej zaprzeczyć twierdzeniom wysuwanym podczas “naukowego wyścigu po sukces”.

- We are living through a golden age of both readily available facts and -denial of those facts. Terrible ideas that have lingered on the fringes for -decades or even centuries have gone mainstream seemingly overnight. -

- When an obscure idea gains currency, there are only two things that can -explain its ascendance: Either the person expressing that idea has gotten a -lot better at stating their case, or the proposition has become harder to -deny in the face of mounting evidence. In other words, if we want people to -take climate change seriously, we can get a bunch of Greta Thunbergs to make -eloquent, passionate arguments from podiums, winning our hearts and minds, -or we can wait for flood, fire, broiling sun, and pandemics to make the case -for us. In practice, we’ll probably have to do some of both: The more we’re -boiling and burning and drowning and wasting away, the easier it will be for -the Greta Thunbergs of the world to convince us. -

- The arguments for ridiculous beliefs in odious conspiracies like -anti-vaccination, climate denial, a flat Earth, and eugenics are no better -than they were a generation ago. Indeed, they’re worse because they are -being pitched to people who have at least a background awareness of the -refuting facts. + Żyjemy w złotej epoce, zarówno łatwo dostępnych faktów, jak i zaprzeczenia +tym faktom. Okropne idee, które pozostawały na marginesie przez +dziesięciolecia, a nawet stulecia, z dnia na dzień weszły do głównego nurtu. +

+ Kiedy niejasny pomysł zyskuje na popularności, istnieją tylko dwie rzeczy, +które mogą wyjaśnić jego przewagę: albo osoba wyrażająca ten pomysł znacznie +lepiej radzi sobie z przedstawieniem swojej racji, albo twierdzenie staje +się trudniejsze do zaprzeczenia w obliczu rosnących dowodów. Innymi słowy, +jeśli chcemy, aby ludzie poważnie podchodzili do zmian klimatycznych, możemy +skłonić grupę Grety Thunberg do wyrażenia wymownych, namiętnych argumentów w +sposób publiczny, przez co zdobędzie ona nasze serca i umysły, lub możemy +poczekać na powódź, ogień, palące się słońce i pandemie, aby przemówiła za +nami. W praktyce prawdopodobnie będziemy musieli zrobić jedno i drugie: im +więcej będziemy gotować, palić, topić i marnować, tym łatwiej będzie Grecie +Thunberg nas przekonać. +

+ Argumenty za absurdalnymi wierzeniami w oparciu o teorie spiskowe, takie jak +teoria antyszczepionkowa, teoria negująca zmiany klimatu, teoria o istnieniu +płaskiej Ziemi i teoria eugeniczna, wcale nie są lepsze niż w pokoleniu +wcześniejszym. W rzeczywistości, są gorsze, ponieważ są przedstawiane +ludziom, którzy mają przynajmniej podstawową świadomość faktów obalających +te teorie.

Anti-vax has been around since the first vaccines, but the early anti-vaxxers were pitching people who were less equipped to understand even @@ -150,7 +154,7 @@ Tech’s stranglehold. We can’t do both, so we have to choose.

I want us to choose wisely. Taming Big Tech is integral to fixing the Internet, and for that, we need digital rights activism. -

Digital rights activism, a quarter-century on

+

Aktywizm praw cyfrowych, krótka historia 25 lat działalności

Digital rights activism is more than 30 years old now. The Electronic Frontier Foundation turned 30 this year; the Free Software Foundation launched in 1985. For most of the history of the movement, the most @@ -190,7 +194,7 @@ species. What’s more, I think that her incorrect diagnosis will lead us down a path that ends up making Big Tech stronger, not weaker. We need to take down Big Tech, and to do that, we need to start by correctly identifying the problem. -

Tech exceptionalism, then and now

+

Wyjątkowość Technologii, dawniej i obecnie

Early critics of the digital rights movement — perhaps best represented by campaigning organizations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the Free Software Foundation, Public Knowledge, and others that focused on preserving @@ -228,7 +232,7 @@ it makes them incapable of perceiving novel threats as they continue to fight the last century’s tech battles.

But tech exceptionalism is a sin no matter who practices it. -

Don’t believe the hype

+

Nie wierz 'szumom' medialnym

You’ve probably heard that “if you’re not paying for the product, you’re the product.” As we’ll see below, that’s true, if incomplete. But what is absolutely true is that ad-driven Big @@ -263,7 +267,7 @@ the data it nonconsensually extracts from your daily life and uses it to customize your feed in ways that get you to buy stuff. It is a mind-control ray out of a 1950s comic book, wielded by mad scientists whose supercomputers guarantee them perpetual and total world domination. -

What is persuasion?

+

Co to jest przekonywanie?

To understand why you shouldn’t worry about mind-control rays — but why you should worry about surveillance and Big Tech — we must start by unpacking what we mean @@ -284,7 +288,7 @@ that surveillance capitalism delivers to its customers are much less impressive. Rather than finding ways to bypass our rational faculties, surveillance capitalists like Mark Zuckerberg mostly do one or more of three things: -

1. Segmenting

+

1. Segmentacja

If you’re selling diapers, you have better luck if you pitch them to people in maternity wards. Not everyone who enters or leaves a maternity ward just had a baby, and not everyone who just had a baby is in the market for @@ -350,7 +354,7 @@ by others coming forward and where people who knew that they were different but lacked a vocabulary for discussing that difference learned the right words from these low-cost means of finding people and learning about their ideas. -

2. Deception

+

2. Podstęp

Lies and fraud are pernicious, and surveillance capitalism supercharges them through targeting. If you want to sell a fraudulent payday loan or subprime mortgage, surveillance capitalism can help you find people who are both @@ -395,7 +399,7 @@ in reality, it is 5,989 feet long, the underlying deception is a problem, but it’s a problem with a simple remedy. It’s a very different problem from the anti-vax issue in which someone’s true belief is displaced by a false one by means of sophisticated persuasion. -

3. Domination

+

3. Dominacja

Surveillance capitalism is the result of monopoly. Monopoly is the cause, and surveillance capitalism and its negative outcomes are the effects of monopoly. I’ll get into this in depth later, but for now, suffice it to say @@ -435,7 +439,7 @@ over much of the world’s beliefs. If our concern is how corporations are foreclosing on our ability to make up our own minds and determine our own futures, the impact of dominance far exceeds the impact of manipulation and should be central to our analysis and any remedies we seek. -

4. Bypassing our rational faculties

+

4. Omijanie naszych racjonalnych zdolności

This is the good stuff: using machine learning, “dark patterns,” engagement hacking, and other techniques to get us to do things that run counter to our better judgment. This is mind @@ -531,7 +535,8 @@ every success. The vulnerability of small segments of the population to dramatic, efficient corporate manipulation is a real concern that’s worthy of our attention and energy. But it’s not an existential threat to society. -

If data is the new oil, then surveillance capitalism’s engine has a leak

+

Jeśli dane są nowym paliwem, to silnik kapitalistycznych systemów nadzoru ma +wyciek

This adaptation problem offers an explanation for one of surveillance capitalism’s most alarming traits: its relentless hunger for data and its endless expansion of data-gathering capabilities through the spread of @@ -700,7 +705,7 @@ half of his advertising spending was wasted is a tribute to the persuasiveness of advertising executives, who are much better at convincing potential clients to buy their services than they are at convincing the general public to buy their clients’ wares. -

What is Facebook?

+

Co to jest Facebook?

Facebook is heralded as the origin of all of our modern plagues, and it’s not hard to see why. Some tech companies want to lock their users in but make their money by monopolizing access to the market for apps for their @@ -858,7 +863,7 @@ get you to do what its advertisers want, think of it as a company that has figured out how to make you slog through an endless torrent of arguments even though they make you miserable, spending so much time on the site that it eventually shows you at least one ad that you respond to. -

Monopoly and the right to the future tense

+

Monopol i prawo do czasu przyszłego

Zuboff and her cohort are particularly alarmed at the extent to which surveillance allows corporations to influence our decisions, taking away something she poetically calls “the right to the future tense” @@ -1010,7 +1015,7 @@ campaign might nudge you to buy a certain brand of phone; but the copyright locks on that phone absolutely determine where you get it serviced, which apps can run on it, and when you have to throw it away rather than fixing it. -

Search order and the right to the future tense

+

Porządek wyszukiwania i prawo do czasu przyszłego

Markets are posed as a kind of magic: By discovering otherwise hidden information conveyed by the free choices of consumers, those consumers’ local knowledge is integrated into a self-correcting system that makes @@ -1111,7 +1116,7 @@ and others are never installed (because they appear on page one million). Apple’s search-ranking design decisions have a vastly more significant effect on consumer behaviors than influence campaigns delivered by surveillance capitalism’s ad-serving bots. -

Monopolists can afford sleeping pills for watchdogs

+

Monopoliści mogą sobie pozwolić na proszki nasenne dla strażników

Only the most extreme market ideologues think that markets can self-regulate without state oversight. Markets need watchdogs — regulators, lawmakers, and other elements of democratic control — to keep them honest. When these @@ -1353,7 +1358,7 @@ logistics, the food supply, pharmaceutical production pipelines, emergency communications, and other critical systems that are accumulating technology debt in part due to the presence of deliberately insecure and deliberately unauditable copyright locks — it will indeed pose an existential risk. -

Privacy and monopoly

+

Prywatność a monopol

Many tech companies are gripped by an orthodoxy that holds that if they just gather enough data on enough of our activities, everything else is possible — the mind control and endless profits. This is an unfalsifiable hypothesis: @@ -1429,7 +1434,7 @@ and make the case against Facebook and Google and Twitter embeds.

In other words, while surveillance doesn’t cause monopolies, monopolies certainly abet surveillance. -

Ronald Reagan, pioneer of tech monopolism

+

Ronald Reagan, pionier monopolizmu technologicznego

Technology exceptionalism is a sin, whether it’s practiced by technology’s blind proponents or by its critics. Both of these camps are prone to explaining away monopolistic concentration by citing some special @@ -1567,7 +1572,7 @@ reasons why their smoking didn’t cause their cancer (“”), true believers in unregulated markets have a whole suite of unconvincing explanations for monopoly in tech that leave capitalism intact. -

Steering with the windshield wipers

+

Sterowanie za pomocą wycieraczek przedniej szyby

It’s been 40 years since Bork’s project to rehabilitate monopolies achieved liftoff, and that is a generation and a half, which is plenty of time to take a common idea and make it seem outlandish and vice versa. Before the @@ -1598,7 +1603,7 @@ crew have forgotten that they’re in a ship at all and no longer remember where the control room is. Adrift, the ship is racing toward its extinction, and unless we can seize the controls and execute emergency course correction, we’re all headed for a fiery death in the heart of a sun. -

Surveillance still matters

+

Systemy nadzoru mają ciągle znaczenie

None of this is to minimize the problems with surveillance. Surveillance matters, and Big Tech’s use of surveillance is an existential risk to our species, but that’s not because surveillance and @@ -1695,7 +1700,7 @@ rules requiring public oversight of police surveillance technology. The more the cops rely on Ring and Neighbors, the harder it will be to pass laws to curb them. The fewer laws there are against them, the more the cops will rely on them. -

Dignity and sanctuary

+

Godność i sanktuarium

But even if we could exercise democratic control over our states and force them to stop raiding surveillance capitalism’s reservoirs of behavioral data, surveillance capitalism would still harm us. @@ -1751,7 +1756,7 @@ difficult ideas. If you locked someone in a cell and agitated them like this, we’d call it “sleep deprivation torture,” and it would be a war crime under the Geneva Conventions. -

Afflicting the afflicted

+

Dręczenie udręczonych

The effects of surveillance on our ability to be our authentic selves are not equal for all people. Some of us are lucky enough to live in a time and place in which all the most important facts of our lives are widely and @@ -1802,8 +1807,8 @@ authentic selves with you. These people are sorrowing and will go to their graves with that secret sorrow in their hearts, and the source of that sorrow will be the falsity of their relationship to you.

- A private realm is necessary for human progress. -

Any data you collect and retain will eventually leak

+ Prywatna rzeczywistość jest konieczna dla rozwoju ludzkości. +

Jakiekolwiek dane, które zbierasz i przetwarzasz, kiedyś w końcu wyciekną

The lack of a private life can rob vulnerable people of the chance to be their authentic selves and constrain our actions by depriving us of sanctuary, but there is another risk that is borne by everyone, not just @@ -1849,7 +1854,8 @@ the erosion of our authentic selves to the undermining of social progress, from state surveillance to an epidemic of online crime. Commercial surveillance is also a boon to people running influence campaigns, but that’s the least of our troubles. -

Critical tech exceptionalism is still tech exceptionalism

+

Przełomowa wyjątkowość technologiczna jest nadal technologiczną +wyjątkowością

Big Tech has long practiced technology exceptionalism: the idea that it should not be subject to the mundane laws and norms of “meatspace.” Mottoes like Facebook’s “move fast and break @@ -1997,8 +2003,8 @@ companies don’t go under, the data they collect is maintained behind the minimum viable security — just enough security to keep the company viable while it waits to get bought out by a tech giant, an amount calculated to spend not one penny more than is necessary on protecting data. -

How monopolies, not mind control, drive surveillance capitalism: The -Snapchat story

+

Jak monopole, a nie kontrola umysłu, sterują kapitalizmen opartym na +systemach nadzoru: historia Snapchat

For the first decade of its existence, Facebook competed with the social media giants of the day (Myspace, Orkut, etc.) by presenting itself as the pro-privacy alternative. Indeed, Facebook justified its walled garden — @@ -2048,7 +2054,7 @@ tactics. Facebook users still want privacy — Facebook hasn’t used surveillance to brainwash them out of it — but they can’t get it because Facebook’s surveillance lets it destroy any hope of a rival service emerging that competes on privacy features. -

A monopoly over your friends

+

Monopol sprawowany nad twoimi przyjaciółmi

A decentralization movement has tried to erode the dominance of Facebook and other Big Tech companies by fielding “indieweb” alternatives — Mastodon as a Twitter alternative, Diaspora as a Facebook alternative, @@ -2071,7 +2077,7 @@ entrenched advantage of the companies that came before them. To understand how that happened, you have to understand both interoperability and adversarial interoperability.

- The hard problem of our species is coordination. + Trudnym problemem naszego gatunku jest koordynacja.

“Interoperability” is the ability of two technologies to work with one another: Anyone can make an LP that will play on any record player, @@ -2208,7 +2214,7 @@ allowing the users who’ve left to continue to communicate with users who haven’t left yet, reaching tendrils over Facebook’s garden wall that Facebook’s trapped users can use to scale the walls and escape to the global, open web. -

Fake news is an epistemological crisis

+

Fałszywe wiadomości to oznaka kryzysu epistemologicznego

Tech is not the only industry that has undergone massive concentration since the Reagan era. Virtually every major industry — from oil to newspapers to meatpacking to sea freight to eyewear to online pornography — has become a @@ -2394,7 +2400,7 @@ reckless collection and retention of personal data, by allowing ads to be targeted in secret, and by foreclosing on the possibility of going somewhere else where you might continue to enjoy your friends without subjecting yourself to commercial surveillance. -

Tech is different

+

Technologia jest czymś odmiennym

I reject both iterations of technological exceptionalism. I reject the idea that tech is uniquely terrible and led by people who are greedier or worse than the leaders of other industries, and I reject the idea that tech is so @@ -2452,7 +2458,7 @@ problems — climate change, inequality, etc. — is with free, fair, and open tech. Our best hope of keeping tech free, fair, and open is to exercise caution in how we regulate tech and to attend closely to the ways in which interventions to solve one problem might create problems in other domains. -

Ownership of facts

+

Własność faktów

Big Tech has a funny relationship with information. When you’re generating information — anything from the location data streaming off your mobile device to the private messages you send to friends on a social network — it @@ -2549,7 +2555,7 @@ harassment or compiling indexes of changes in language or simply investigating how the platforms are shaping our discourse — all of which require scraping data that other people have created and subjecting it to scrutiny and analysis. -

Persuasion works… slowly

+

Przekonywanie działa… powoli

The platforms may oversell their ability to persuade people, but obviously, persuasion works sometimes. Whether it’s the private realm that LGBTQ people used to recruit allies and normalize sexual diversity or the decadeslong @@ -2597,7 +2603,7 @@ malpractice that monopolism contributes to is a significant contributor to these conditions. Inequality creates the conditions for both conspiracies and violent racist ideologies, and then surveillance capitalism lets opportunists target the fearful and the conspiracy-minded. -

Paying won’t help

+

Płacenie nie pomoże

As the old saw goes, “If you’re not paying for the product, you’re the product.”

@@ -2730,7 +2736,7 @@ Chinese markets. Monopolies may be made up of good, ethical people, but as institutions, they are not your friend — they will do whatever they can get away with to maximize their profits, and the more monopolistic they are, the more they can get away with. -

An “ecology” moment for trustbusting

+

“ ekologia” chwila na zerwanie zaufania

If we’re going to break Big Tech’s death grip on our digital lives, we’re going to have to fight monopolies. That may sound pretty mundane and old-fashioned, something out of the New Deal era, while ending the use of @@ -2750,7 +2756,7 @@ on our society. The trustbusting era could not begin until we found the political will — until the people convinced politicians they’d have their backs when they went up against the richest, most powerful men in the world.

- Could we find that political will again? + Czy moglibyśmy ponownie znaleźć tę wolę polityczną?

Copyright scholar James Boyle has described how the term “ecology” marked a turning point in environmental @@ -2839,7 +2845,7 @@ their monopoly profits on governance. But we can’t do both. We have to choose between a vibrant, open internet or a dominated, monopolized internet commanded by Big Tech giants that we struggle with constantly to get them to behave themselves. -

Make Big Tech small again

+

Spraw, aby 'Big Tech' stała się ponownie 'małą' technologią

Trustbusting is hard. Breaking big companies into smaller ones is expensive and time-consuming. So time-consuming that by the time you’re done, the world has often moved on and rendered years of litigation irrelevant. From @@ -2959,7 +2965,7 @@ selves — and because it lets the rich and powerful figure out who might be thinking of building guillotines and what dirt they can use to discredit those embryonic guillotine-builders before they can even get to the lumberyard. -

Up and through

+

W górę i na wylot

With all the problems of Big Tech, it’s tempting to imagine solving the problem by returning to a world without tech at all. Resist that temptation.

diff --git a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.pdf b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.pdf index e4d3d03..8f5f52f 100644 Binary files a/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.pdf and b/public/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism.pl.pdf differ