From fdaddd608a0563770ee6be3c05d78c3e1b41b34a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petter Reinholdtsen Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:44:44 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Generated. --- blog/Brushing_up_on_old_packages_in_Xiph_and_Debian.html | 5 ++--- blog/archive/2025/02/02.rss | 5 ++--- blog/archive/2025/02/index.html | 5 ++--- blog/index.html | 5 ++--- blog/index.rss | 5 ++--- blog/tags/debian/debian.rss | 5 ++--- blog/tags/debian/index.html | 5 ++--- blog/tags/english/english.rss | 5 ++--- blog/tags/english/index.html | 5 ++--- blog/tags/multimedia/index.html | 5 ++--- blog/tags/multimedia/multimedia.rss | 5 ++--- blog/tags/standard/index.html | 5 ++--- blog/tags/standard/standard.rss | 5 ++--- blog/tags/video/index.html | 5 ++--- blog/tags/video/video.rss | 5 ++--- 15 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) diff --git a/blog/Brushing_up_on_old_packages_in_Xiph_and_Debian.html b/blog/Brushing_up_on_old_packages_in_Xiph_and_Debian.html index d98d163826..4995eee6dd 100644 --- a/blog/Brushing_up_on_old_packages_in_Xiph_and_Debian.html +++ b/blog/Brushing_up_on_old_packages_in_Xiph_and_Debian.html @@ -43,9 +43,8 @@ across the ltnu script from the package. It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single maintainer should have a look at. But I wanted a archive wide -summary. I lifted the UDD SQL -query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up -with the following command:

+summary. Based on the UDD SQL +query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:

 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/archive/2025/02/02.rss b/blog/archive/2025/02/02.rss
index a30461ceed..6d47c2fdc4 100644
--- a/blog/archive/2025/02/02.rss
+++ b/blog/archive/2025/02/02.rss
@@ -32,9 +32,8 @@ across the <tt>ltnu</tt> script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:</p>
+summary.  Based on the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
+query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:</p>
 
 <pre>
 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/archive/2025/02/index.html b/blog/archive/2025/02/index.html
index 7bf38e69f1..009ad7d85d 100644
--- a/blog/archive/2025/02/index.html
+++ b/blog/archive/2025/02/index.html
@@ -50,9 +50,8 @@ across the ltnu script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the UDD SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:

+summary. Based on the UDD SQL +query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:

 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/index.html b/blog/index.html
index 6f7948b0f5..f78267bc20 100644
--- a/blog/index.html
+++ b/blog/index.html
@@ -43,9 +43,8 @@ across the ltnu script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the UDD SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:

+summary. Based on the UDD SQL +query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:

 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss
index 8117604b40..d43ea71e6d 100644
--- a/blog/index.rss
+++ b/blog/index.rss
@@ -32,9 +32,8 @@ across the <tt>ltnu</tt> script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:</p>
+summary.  Based on the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
+query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:</p>
 
 <pre>
 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss b/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss
index 30eaa89643..9c39a53fd5 100644
--- a/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss
+++ b/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss
@@ -32,9 +32,8 @@ across the <tt>ltnu</tt> script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:</p>
+summary.  Based on the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
+query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:</p>
 
 <pre>
 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/tags/debian/index.html b/blog/tags/debian/index.html
index 7cc520399b..3a4cd26f4d 100644
--- a/blog/tags/debian/index.html
+++ b/blog/tags/debian/index.html
@@ -49,9 +49,8 @@ across the ltnu script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the UDD SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:

+summary. Based on the UDD SQL +query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:

 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/tags/english/english.rss b/blog/tags/english/english.rss
index 870a9bd84f..9b68c6cb45 100644
--- a/blog/tags/english/english.rss
+++ b/blog/tags/english/english.rss
@@ -32,9 +32,8 @@ across the <tt>ltnu</tt> script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:</p>
+summary.  Based on the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
+query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:</p>
 
 <pre>
 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/tags/english/index.html b/blog/tags/english/index.html
index 4ce68cb1df..e83a185ae7 100644
--- a/blog/tags/english/index.html
+++ b/blog/tags/english/index.html
@@ -49,9 +49,8 @@ across the ltnu script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the UDD SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:

+summary. Based on the UDD SQL +query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:

 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/tags/multimedia/index.html b/blog/tags/multimedia/index.html
index 976626abe8..970765beee 100644
--- a/blog/tags/multimedia/index.html
+++ b/blog/tags/multimedia/index.html
@@ -49,9 +49,8 @@ across the ltnu script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the UDD SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:

+summary. Based on the UDD SQL +query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:

 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/tags/multimedia/multimedia.rss b/blog/tags/multimedia/multimedia.rss
index c28597748e..c53d02d117 100644
--- a/blog/tags/multimedia/multimedia.rss
+++ b/blog/tags/multimedia/multimedia.rss
@@ -32,9 +32,8 @@ across the <tt>ltnu</tt> script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:</p>
+summary.  Based on the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
+query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:</p>
 
 <pre>
 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/tags/standard/index.html b/blog/tags/standard/index.html
index b37ed18175..a195d826ea 100644
--- a/blog/tags/standard/index.html
+++ b/blog/tags/standard/index.html
@@ -49,9 +49,8 @@ across the ltnu script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the UDD SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:

+summary. Based on the UDD SQL +query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:

 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/tags/standard/standard.rss b/blog/tags/standard/standard.rss
index 33ea20fd3c..c9af98ac3c 100644
--- a/blog/tags/standard/standard.rss
+++ b/blog/tags/standard/standard.rss
@@ -32,9 +32,8 @@ across the <tt>ltnu</tt> script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:</p>
+summary.  Based on the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
+query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:</p>
 
 <pre>
 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/tags/video/index.html b/blog/tags/video/index.html
index f2e69507b5..7460441654 100644
--- a/blog/tags/video/index.html
+++ b/blog/tags/video/index.html
@@ -49,9 +49,8 @@ across the ltnu script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the UDD SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:

+summary. Based on the UDD SQL +query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:

 #!/bin/sh
diff --git a/blog/tags/video/video.rss b/blog/tags/video/video.rss
index 5dbc32cdd6..4a045ce499 100644
--- a/blog/tags/video/video.rss
+++ b/blog/tags/video/video.rss
@@ -32,9 +32,8 @@ across the <tt>ltnu</tt> script from the
 package.  It can sort by last update, packages maintained by a single
 user/group, and is useful to figure out which packages a single
 maintainer should have a look at.  But I wanted a archive wide
-summary.  I lifted the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
-query used by ltnu from the script and adjusted it slightly to end up
-with the following command:</p>
+summary.  Based on the <a href="https://udd.debian.org/">UDD</a> SQL
+query used by ltnu, I ended up with the following command:</p>
 
 <pre>
 #!/bin/sh
-- 
2.47.2