From c6843e8ebe94cbe6bb66c2ab3045a69fba681de1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petter Reinholdtsen Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 06:42:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Generated. --- ...rallellized_boot_seem_to_hold_up_well_in_Debian_testing.html | 2 +- blog/archive/2010/05/05.rss | 2 +- blog/archive/2010/05/index.html | 2 +- blog/data/2010-05-27-parallel-boot.txt | 2 ++ blog/index.html | 2 +- blog/index.rss | 2 +- blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss | 2 +- blog/tags/debian edu/index.html | 2 +- blog/tags/debian/debian.rss | 2 +- blog/tags/debian/index.html | 2 +- blog/tags/english/english.rss | 2 +- blog/tags/english/index.html | 2 +- 12 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/blog/Parallellized_boot_seem_to_hold_up_well_in_Debian_testing.html b/blog/Parallellized_boot_seem_to_hold_up_well_in_Debian_testing.html index f5d92d5a1f..1e343420c2 100644 --- a/blog/Parallellized_boot_seem_to_hold_up_well_in_Debian_testing.html +++ b/blog/Parallellized_boot_seem_to_hold_up_well_in_Debian_testing.html @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ maintainer is on the case.
  • The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -try to switch back to +try to switch back to sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a diff --git a/blog/archive/2010/05/05.rss b/blog/archive/2010/05/05.rss index e86a142778..7717634f3a 100644 --- a/blog/archive/2010/05/05.rss +++ b/blog/archive/2010/05/05.rss @@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ maintainer is on the case.</li> <li>The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/550425">try to switch back</a> to +<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/575080">try to switch back</a> to sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a diff --git a/blog/archive/2010/05/index.html b/blog/archive/2010/05/index.html index 4a859179c4..4a7addbb30 100644 --- a/blog/archive/2010/05/index.html +++ b/blog/archive/2010/05/index.html @@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ maintainer is on the case.
  • The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -try to switch back to +try to switch back to sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a diff --git a/blog/data/2010-05-27-parallel-boot.txt b/blog/data/2010-05-27-parallel-boot.txt index eb845b2d17..b67e3cd475 100644 --- a/blog/data/2010-05-27-parallel-boot.txt +++ b/blog/data/2010-05-27-parallel-boot.txt @@ -39,3 +39,5 @@ which I expect will be fixed in a reasonable time span.

    the BTS, please usertag the report to get it to show up at the list of usertagged bugs related to this.

    + +

    Update: Correct bug number to file-rc issue.

    diff --git a/blog/index.html b/blog/index.html index 784d3e8b5f..7f47311a63 100644 --- a/blog/index.html +++ b/blog/index.html @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ maintainer is on the case.
  • The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -try to switch back to +try to switch back to sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a diff --git a/blog/index.rss b/blog/index.rss index 756481921a..c932f6644f 100644 --- a/blog/index.rss +++ b/blog/index.rss @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ maintainer is on the case.</li> <li>The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/550425">try to switch back</a> to +<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/575080">try to switch back</a> to sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a diff --git a/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss b/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss index c101d229ee..0d2331a624 100644 --- a/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss +++ b/blog/tags/debian edu/debian edu.rss @@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ maintainer is on the case.</li> <li>The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/550425">try to switch back</a> to +<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/575080">try to switch back</a> to sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a diff --git a/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html b/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html index 6c52fd0272..8757ddd993 100644 --- a/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html +++ b/blog/tags/debian edu/index.html @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ maintainer is on the case.
  • The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -try to switch back to +try to switch back to sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a diff --git a/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss b/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss index 6a6b834ec6..978a5daece 100644 --- a/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss +++ b/blog/tags/debian/debian.rss @@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ maintainer is on the case.</li> <li>The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/550425">try to switch back</a> to +<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/575080">try to switch back</a> to sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a diff --git a/blog/tags/debian/index.html b/blog/tags/debian/index.html index 1f8b0398d6..7e284e5a2e 100644 --- a/blog/tags/debian/index.html +++ b/blog/tags/debian/index.html @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ maintainer is on the case.
  • The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -try to switch back to +try to switch back to sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a diff --git a/blog/tags/english/english.rss b/blog/tags/english/english.rss index 381ae14c73..aa2779b28f 100644 --- a/blog/tags/english/english.rss +++ b/blog/tags/english/english.rss @@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ maintainer is on the case.</li> <li>The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/550425">try to switch back</a> to +<a href="http://bugs.debian.org/575080">try to switch back</a> to sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a diff --git a/blog/tags/english/index.html b/blog/tags/english/index.html index 7a988d2bf9..d9199faca5 100644 --- a/blog/tags/english/index.html +++ b/blog/tags/english/index.html @@ -1774,7 +1774,7 @@ maintainer is on the case.
  • The sysv-rc package fail to properly enable dependency based boot sequencing (the shutdown is broken) when old file-rc users -try to switch back to +try to switch back to sysv-rc. One way to solve it would be for file-rc to create /etc/init.d/.legacy-bootordering, and another is to try to make sysv-rc more robust. Will investigate some more and probably upload a -- 2.47.2