From a14f32a108d34f2ac1ef6b070378ed16eaa23660 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 17:34:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] New post.

---
 blog/data/2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/blog/data/2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt b/blog/data/2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt
index e27f5c924a..fa90dd0107 100644
--- a/blog/data/2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt
+++ b/blog/data/2012-09-15-ietf-video-codec.txt
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@ Date: 2012-09-15 19:40
 <a href="http://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/IETF_standardize_its_first_multimedia_codec__Opus.html">Opus
 codec made</a> it into <a href="http://www.ietf.org/">IETF</a> as
 <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6716">RFC 6716</a>, I had a look
-to see if there is any activity to standardize a video codec too, and
-I was happy to discover that there is some activity in this area too.
-A non-working group mailing list
+to see if there is any activity in IETF to standardize a video codec
+too, and I was happy to discover that there is some activity in this
+area.  A non-"working group" mailing list
 <a href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/video-codec">video-codec</a>
-<a href="http://ietf.10.n7.nabble.com/New-Non-WG-Mailing-List-video-codec-Video-codec-BoF-discussion-list-td119548.html">was
-created 2012-08-20</a>.  It is intended to discuss the topic and if a
+was
+<a href="http://ietf.10.n7.nabble.com/New-Non-WG-Mailing-List-video-codec-Video-codec-BoF-discussion-list-td119548.html">created 2012-08-20</a>.  It is intended to discuss the topic and if a
 formal working group should be formed.</p>
 
 <p>I look forward to see how this plays out.  There is already
-- 
2.47.2